Buttons are OK as long as you choose the option to "add to frame border" - at least, they show up....I had one showing up fine, but once I did, the window remained "active" when switching to another app unless you rolled the mouse over one of the title bar buttons (see https://www.wincustomize.com/msgboard.asp?BID=WCS&id=266757) Since the title bar text background image doesn't have an option to add to the window frame, I would expect it to remain tranparent if it overlaps in the title
Sput
a) if something is available for download, it doesn't mean it's available for people to use at will. It doesn't mean it's copyrite free unless it says so explicitly. There is such a thing as (c) free music, you can buy CD's of the stuff. b) it doesn't matter if your selling it - redistribution is a breach of (C) unless you have permision in advance. c) just because something is available for download does not mean the author "doesn't care any more" - everything on the web ret
Well, "all" I have left to do for my 2nd attempt at a submission now are: Scroll bars Column headings Treeview +/- Combo box ...a few other controls and misc easy bits, ...and the biggies.... Toolbar icons Dialogue animations Yikes... I'd also really like to have the menu separator bug fixed, which seems to be an issue in WB and I'd like to include a title bar animation if only I could think of something that would fit the theme...
BTW - not that anyone would be interested, but one of my first ever jobs (after working in a soap factory) was writing a tutorial program to go with some software for a company - and a key bit of that was writing routines to draw windows using ASCII characters, including different borders and colours, and animated popping up and vanishing in various ways
ASCII windows, sort of like this (this will look wrong because it's not a fixed space font): /====================\ ¦.Window Title Bar..............¦ ===================== ¦ Window body here..........¦ ¦................................................¦ L__________________/ [Message Edited]
Mute is no good if people are listening to their own stuff in media play though is it? (C) - you can't ignore it by just adding a link as you suggest. You would need to get formal permission to include another persons work or else you're breaking the law....sorry, but that's the way it is. Anything else is theft. Now...if you include and use your own work, that's fine...I just wouldn't ch
Hmmm, I tried something similar just recently though not with the text background. I assume it's the text background bit which isn't working? I tried to have a button extend above the visible area of the title bar and it caused all sorts of glitches so I had to bin the idea....I suspect that the text background will be even more problematic as I don't think it has the option to "add to the frame border" that buttons can have. 'fraid I can't suggest a solution...just empathising...<img
Maggot - well done at sticking at it. Hope you don't think we were getting at you as it was only the point about "paying for things and expect them to work 100% of the time" which I thought needed clarification....other than that, it's excellent that you've helped them improve their products through the beta process for the good of everyone Hopefully you can feed back results of the experiments yo
Doesn't SS save a Universal skin format into UIS2 when applying it to WB? Anyhow, I'm afraid I've given up working in Universal Skin format as it had too many compatability issues when applied to WB...there are all sorts of bits which it fails to "convert", and so they don't work. As an example, the mouse over graphics on the start menu wouldn't work at all in Universal format, but worked (without changes) once I switched to UIS2 and put the settings back as they should be (SS didn't conv
Hmmm...I can see why it might suit some people, but a lot of people would choose to be listening to their own music rather than the theme authors choice. Pluse, how quickly would a looping track get anoying? Plus, isn't there a (C) issue when using existing works? This has made me remember an article back in the late 80's though about using sound as feedback to the user...the idea was that when things are working in the background, if they made a very quiet repeating sound, then the u
CerebroJD - I'd spotted that alternative compact menu of yours on the GUIO and I've been meaning to check it out, you slippery ingenious devil you. -and ASCII skins sounds like a good idea for a theme...it could be based on the look of an old green screen monitor, and use faked text characters to make up the windows etc....it's crazy, but it just might work <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/l
/me got a skin into the GUIO with just a pea-shooter and some bare faced cheek to try something odd....and a willingness by the mods to let me look silly when the other gun slingers pull their 6-shooters I'm hoping the more serious skin I've been working on for the GUIO makes it past moderation...the problem is that everytime someone adds something amazing (^^Gabriel!! <img src="http://images.stardo
Hmmmm...interesting challenge...I suspect if I took the toolbar icons and animations out of my minimal skin that it would be down to
Maggot - in software development, release candidate usually means something like: "we think this version is feature complete and almost ready to release but it just needs some last quality checking and bug fixing before we do so" it doesn't mean "this is it, we're done" ...and as Hippy points out, anyone who expects any software to be perfect on every machine is in for disapointment - no matter how much you pay for it. What's great about Stardock products is that they
Essencay - Hmmm, I missed a trick doing my minimal entry for the GUIO didn't I? I did try and make a start menu without ANY text (I forgot to remove the user icon/user name bit)...but the moderators on the GUIO thought it was a bug (or just didn't like it) and rejected it until I put the text back
wbgizmos - ya beat me to it. Not only does it try and install spyware/adware, but the site then popped up it's own cheeky message pretending to have just "discovered" some spyware on my machine and offering to sell me something to remove it! I don't think I'll be going anywhere near the site again if that's their idea of advertising
Excellent...I've followed your advice and downloaded imageforge to give it a go
BTW - there's a post on the bootskin newsgroup saying 1.04 is expected this week with (hopefully) a fix for the hibenation issue (which I've had) and possibly this sort of problem too...so, check the web site later in the week
Yep, I've duplicated it in every app I've found that uses MDI - including Skin Studio itself, which is perhaps the best thing for Stardock to test it on as it's their software too
Maggot - as I said on the other thread, if you want something to work, stick to the released versions. If you want the joys of beta software, be prepared for the trials too. You ought to be prepared for it to completely hose your machine even...it's a "use at your own risk" situation. *sigh* /me wonders what people think "show pre-release versions" means!
DesignCaddy - that could be because you have the option "show icon in the system tray" turned off in the User Overrides?
Hmmm, seems that creating ones own graphic doesn't solve this...not for me with the latest WB build anyhow. The minimised window still inherits it's transparency from the non-minimised window frames. Since I want the minimized frame to be non-recrangular I've tried using magic pink etc but to no avail (the magic pink bits show up as black instead)...so, for now I've "fudged it" by using a shade of grey similar to the MDI background image. However, it still has the problem that a small
Maggot - I've noticed with that build that if I have something else running which is taking a significant amount of processing time, then the switch to a new skin doesn't seem to complete fully. Graphics then appear with a mouse over/resize etc. It could be that something else on your system is interfering with the switching process, and WB in general. Rather than complain that beta software isn't 100% working, best to contact tech support directly [email protected]
CerebroJD - it seems related to font size I noticed...which makes it extra tricky as the user can over-ride the fonts used if they choose which "breaks" it It would be cool if Stardock could add this as a fully supported feature the same as they've now added a "remove user icon" option. What we want is a "remove "all programs text" <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/joke.gif" border=