I thought this was an article on Hillary! ! I dont see a problem. Conservatives are known to admit they are wrong when they are. Contrary to liberals.
Dr Guy
When you jump to conclusions, you often land in a briar patch: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,136745,00.html You lose Col Klink! That pesky Hogan got you again! !
Bush did not respond as the report has been shown to be a lie. I guess you just read the hype, and not the story tho. Would you defend a lie? I dont think so. But Kerry's accusation does accuse the troops of supreme incompetance. That was not Bush's defense, that was his observation. And you only have to listen to him to see that is exactly what he said!
P.S. Since that 1964 civil rights act, what have Republicans done for minorities? Just interested. People keep bringing up that 40 year old vote. A lot of Southern Democrats became Republicans in that time. If you actually read my article, I mentioned that the racism of the Southern Republicans seemed to be at odds with the National Party. </T
In other words, if the Republicans aren't fighting for affirmative action, don't have the support of a questionable group (that has no problem calling black people "colored"), or calling black people too stupid to vote electronically, they're racist and against civil rights. In the politically correct world, if you believe that blacks ar
An important qualification devoutly to be deleted by the Dr.& Co. Beeep! Wrong. I dont delete just because it is incorrect or stupid. I let it stand as a testament. And of course the quoted material is incorrect. Even the NYT is now backing off the story. Looks like the only ones that are not are C
It would lend credence to your inflamatory headlines if you actually quoted a news source, and not an opinion piece. Late breaking news: NO Iraqi prisoners Unaccounted for!
It has been alleged that if your are a republican, you are a racist, and the proof of that is that the south is now republican. The left tries to do this every election to keep the blacks safely in their voting fold, and for the past several elections, it has worked. Which is a pity since the best friend the blacks have are the republicans. The democrats that are racists, with few exceptions, remained in the democrat party and either retired or died. While some may point to Strom Th
Dr. Guy: The FACTS are that when the soldiers were advancing on Baghdad they "passed by" the dump and it went UNSECURED for 2 weeks that could have been used to take some or all of the explosives. The FACTS are that when they passed by the Iraqi soldiers were
And just for the record: " It was proved it was long gone, and CBS, Dan Rather, and the Kerry Kool aid drinkers are the only ones trying to stretch credulity to suggest otherwise. " <FON
This guy would stab his mother in the back to become president Funny you should mention this. According to Kerry, before he decided to run, he went to his dying mother's bed, and she gave him 3 words of advice if he decided to run: "Integrity, Integrity, Integrity". It is patently obvious, he has betrayed his own mother and stabbed her in the back!
It has been known for some time that this was possible (reproduction without a male), so the news does not come as a surprise, and is not that depressing. After all, without males, women would have no one to yell at when they have PMS!
Doesn't the "timing" of the story miss the entire POINT of the real issues here? Who CARES when the story broke? You guys are so caught up in the political spin that you miss the real issue entirely You accuse others of yoru own crime. Typical Liberal. The timing of the story is the story! The missing material was missing 18 months ago, and was not
You know, you really need to stop getting all YOUR news at Newsmax, FOX, and Drudge. 377 TONS of explosive WERE there at that site, recorded by the IAEA! Get it! That's tons, dude, not easily movable, not back up the Ford F-150 and cart it down the road. That requires big equipment that should have been EASILY spottable and U.S. troops went by the facility and never checke
So you mean the United States goes into Iraq to look for WMD's and we find a Al Qaaqa that is supposed to have explosives as reported by the IAEA and now, even 18 months later, the White House said Monday they didn't know what the story was in the first place? That isn't a story? Wrong story. They did
Reply By: Nadeon Posted: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 As for the documentary, I stand corrected. "Stolen Honor" was not aired, but I did find this on the Sinclair website: I did see a bootleg copy of this, and quite frankly it was a tenuous stretch to call it anti-Kerry. I am a Bush supporter, but I failed to see
Reply #7 By: apdelong31 - 10/26/2004 5:02:01 PM www.sbgi.net It was foolish. Seem to have to make that statement a lot on JU. Now we can play nice Most of the time I just hide. It takes a big man to say that. I doff my chapeau to you. And you have my respect.
From the Sinclair Broadcasting Group website, they own 62 television stations in 39 markets including ABC, NBC, CBS, and FOX affiliates. As for the documentary, I stand corrected. "Stolen Honor" was not aired, but I did find this on the Sinclair website: And I really appreciate being called a fool, thanks for th
It is apparent by the fact that Kerry already has lawyers lined up coast to coast that he will fight for endless recounts no matter who wins! yea, and Dan Rather reports news Objectively! Hopefully, it will not be that close and whoever wins (Bush), will be far enough ahead that any attempt by the loser (Kerry) will be met with contempt and derision. Well, at least by half the country. The other half are still on Kool aid! <img src=
CrispE, you are wrong. Perot got 20% of the vote after pulling out and then re-enteing the race! He had a very good shot if he had been serious all along. His problem was that the was just out to defeat bush, and did not want the job itself. So when it looked like he actually might win, or throw it into the House and Senate, where he still could win, he pulled out. Then got back in to make sure Bush was defeated. he could have don
Interestingly enough, the "liberal media" plans on OVERRIDING all subsidiary broadcasting to air an anti-Kerry movie before the election, and I haven't seen it yet. (LinkLink) Not even close! And they have already pulled it. That was Sinclair, and they dont do news, they just own some tv statio
Daiwa, You are correct in not being surprised. However, I was a bit surprised that Dan Rather would try it again so soon. He must be desperate. And a little surprised that ViaCom would let him. Can anyone trust CBS for a credible news source now? I think not.
I know how tough withdrawal is, so here are some points to help ease the pain! !
Acutally, there already is a test for Voters: #1: They have to show up at the right Polling Place - Even in Ohio now #2: They have to show some ID #3: They have to know what day to show up! And in some places, they have to have the strength to punch a chad (for those that never have, there is almost no force requiredd, but elderly can request assistance to punch it through). And those that cant do the above, they
Evil, the alternate arguemnt, advanced by the 30 odd states that would have no clout under a popular election, is that they would have no say in a popular election! And to get rid of the electoral college, you would have to have 3/4 of the states approve. That is not going to happen, as there are a lot more small states than big states. I live in a non-swing state as well, so I doubt my vote will count for much either, but I would ra