Lula posts: #57
doesn't applying the reality of abortion work rather well in addressing OCKHAMSRAZOR's questions?
End of quote
OCK POSTS: #58
It exactly proves my point, Lula. Thanks.
End of quote
OCK POSTS: #90
Despite Lulas attempt to hyperfocus on abortion in order to discredit a general point
End of quote
OCK,
You're trying to have it both ways...again.
Of my using the example of the evil of abortion, you thank me for exactly proving your point and then, when you realize there is no wiggle room concerning the absolute objective truth that abortion is evil and therefore wrong, you now say I'm using abortion to discredit your point.
OCK POSTS:
what IS right and what IS wrong (absolutism based on unproveable premises)
End of quote
OCK POSTS #58
No belief is objectively provable.
End of quote
Is abortion killing a baby? Yes.
Is that belief objective? Yes.
Is that belief provable? Yes.
Is killing a baby in the womb an intolerable evil act? Yes.
OCK POSTS #58
No belief is objectively provable, so Christians support not working together over principles they cannot prove objectively to non-Christians to be true.
End of quote
Therefore, abortion is objectively, provable evil.
Evil is not working together to make the world a better place
End of quote
OCK POSTS: #46
I rather agree with this. But it's got a few potholes. If you claim sole knowledge of the definition of what makes the world a better place, you do so at the expense of others who think *they* know what makes the world a better place. And that isn't "working together." So what is the missing element? Tolerance of differences.
End of quote
Evil is tolerating the intolerable. Those who believe in God's absolute, "thou shalt not kill" will not tolerate the intolerable.