WinCustomize Forums
[e digicons]8(|[/e]
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="10" id="2971094"]Just logon with your same account info and get the relevant Betas you need and/or want.[/quote] Even if (as mentioned above) you just bought ODNT or renewed an expired one?
[quote who="DaveBax" reply="3" id="2971062"]Afew days or a week ago all I saw was it's OK to felete Impulse now as it does nothing for us anymore and we are waiting for another method being worked on. Now you say to use Impulse to download the update[/quote] EXACTLY.. and I brought that point up in reply #3 of that thread, yet the conversation turned more toward looking for expirations, updates, etc, and we were pretty much encouraged to abandon Impulse for ODNT applications.
[quote who="Jafo" reply="66" id="2970718"]Try going back four million, three hundred and twentyone thousand, two hundred and seventyseven memberships ago [/quote] Jafo is showing his age again...[e digicons]:rofl:[/e] [e digicons]:rofl:[/e] [e digicons]:rofl:[/e]
[quote who="k10w3" reply="56" id="2970549"]Interesting read in the news today --"Creative types are full of themselves, study [/quote] As one of the comments pointed out, such a conclusion based on the polling of 1300 college students really means nothing at all. I can poll 1300 cabbage patch dolls and make the conclusion that Zubaz can actually spell if I show them a printout of any of his replies and tell them to scream when they see a misspelled word. <img src="http://web.s
IMO, i would rather slit my throat with a dull Zubish infested dictionary than to use... ( insert artists work example here ). It's a bit dam harsh saying that someone would rather slit their "fucking" throat than to use someone's wall. I'm also sure there are people here that would rather take a red hot poker in the poop-shoot than use a gothic cartoon woman as a wall, but they don't go around making a public statement like that. Perhaps someone is damn proud of their
I sure don't see where it say that on the site for WB. https://www.stardock.com/products/windowblinds/ - however it does still say you need impulse. shouldn't that be fixed?
from the article [quote]he said Microsoft’s Windows 7 already looks pretty nice and the________ has shifted away from the desktop enhancements and into practical software, such as Multiplicity [/quote] Notice the underline? There is a word missing in the article that could change the entire meaning of this statement. No sense "panty bunching" over a missing word now is there? Another line.. [quote]but would want to keep tha
[quote who="Zubaz" reply="38" id="2965636"]Most of teh ODNT users are not on the forums and use the stable releases. [/quote] i stand corrtected (zubish anwer). First time for everything.. [e digicons]XD[/e]
[quote who="Island Dog" reply="36" id="2965628"]Still doesn't answer how we're supposed to update our ODNT apps. Head over to https://store.stardock.com/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=/myaccount/products Download the links and apps are updated. [/quote] Updated to what.. the latest production release? Most of us ( I believe ) don't use those. We use the latest beta release.
[quote who="Wizard1956" reply="5" id="2964999"]That's a great question, Phoon. I don't see DX4 anywhere[/quote] Yeah, THAT one is in a class all by itself! It is in the FUBAR classification. LOL Looks like we may be caught in the "cart before the horse" syndrome for awhile.
According to https://forums.wincustomize.com/409931/page/4/#replies , betas are not available without impulse. Does the response in this thread indicate that betas are not available in impulse either? If so, then where are we to get them?
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="5" id="2963845"]During my life, I've seen Sputnik, the space race, the Apollo, Gemini and the Shuttle programs. [/quote] hey Doc.. you left out.. " the invention of the wheel" LOL
Another reason I belive we don't see that kind of quality anymore is that (to me) a Windowblinds skin just doesn't cut it anymore. Too many pieces are not able to be skinned and thus NOTHING looks 100% complete. MS has ruined Windowblinds skinning. There are some good blinds around and what can be skinned is done fairly well but I still think the small details aren't there like they used to be. I feel that quality has taken a back seat to quantity with quite a few talented people.
[quote who="HG_Eliminator" reply="39" id="2960234"]PS.. also remember, when WC was created all types of skinnable programs were and are still hosted.. A virtual community for all skinners to enjoy, "not" just those who skin SD app's..[/quote] When I came around in 2001ish SD apps were the front runners. They are more so now either from the other apps falling by the wayside or from the way the new WC is created with those apps primarily in hiding unless turned on. I'm n
[quote who="Jafo" reply="25" id="2959624"]Since day One, here at WC people have been of the opinion that Stardock rakes in MILLIONS from the existence of this website. It doesn't...and it never has. It runs "happily" at a loss, sponsored by Stardock's Community spirit.[/quote] HOW-EV-ER... there is no way anyone will ever convince ME that if it were not for the existence of Wincustomize most of the SD customization products would NOT still be in existence
Winstep is the best piece of (this type of) software ever created. I can't say enough positive things about it or JCRabbit and his dedication to its success. It also goes without saying that if were not for Webgizmos we would all have quite a less than stunning experience with it (and Object Dock). So, Karma Karma Karma to both of you!
[quote who="Skinhit" reply="12" id="2958264"]I just want to be naked[/quote] and now I'm in the fetal position with my thumb in my mouth crying like a little schoolgirl...
WinCustomize Forums
DX is so borked on Win7...
so beta versions of the applications are not available to us using this method??
WinCustomize Forums
[quote who="impinc" reply="2" id="2956304"]finger gestures (mostly relating to how web pages are handled). Like how you move a web page left or right with your finger. Or to pinch zoom with two fingers.[/quote] yep.. that is an interface and I don't care WHO developed it. If they created it then they deserve a patent. period.
WinCustomize Forums
what is assenine is that it took 4 years for the patent to be awarded in the first place. It could have saved a lot of court time had it been awarded in an effecient manner. On the other foot, Android should not have copied the interface like they did.
why the external link to softpedia? Is that JC's official link for downloading it? I see your new link in reply #2 but you should probably change the original one to an approved site...
You can use DHCP and have it give the same IP address each time to the devices. As KKU stated, it will be impossible to get real granular with this until we know the exact brand and model of the router. What you will need is the MAC address of each device. ( do ipconfig /all and note the "Physical Address" of the network adapters. It will be in a xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx format) In your router you can assign this MAC address to a specific IP address and it will stick. For you
Your face, ... Your Ass... What's the difference... "Duke Nukem 3D"