Have Blacks become professional victims?

Denouncing poilitical correctness

While watching {for the hundreth time} news hashing over the handcuffing of the 5 year old black child, I was struck by one thing.

To a man/woman when the speaker is black the charge of racisim comes to the front lines, not a misjudgement, not poor training, because the cops were white, IT HAD TO BE RACIST BEHAVIOR.

While I agree that racisim and bigotry excist, NOT EVERY ACTION that has negative results is a form of racisim.

Since the advent of the civil rights act, blacks have learned that the one way to disarm a white person is to scream race, loud and often.
THE BLACK CRIMINAL ARRESTED BY A WHITE COP, screams racisim in the hopes of a reduced sentence or to be let off completely.

Jesse Jackson the man that could have taken Dr. kings place has chose instead to rape the whites of money in the name of reverse racisim. This behavior is ATRIBUTED to the climate of political correctness, that in my opinion is destroying america.

No longer can a man say to a woman "you look nice in that new dress" without worry of sexual harressmant charges.
No longer can a man like bill O'reilly say that he disagrees with the antics of sean penn {white} tim robbins {white} and danny glover {black} without glover calling bills comments Racist .

When will this end? never I say as long a political correctness holds sway in america.

Was the bahavior of the three cops bad judgement? yes. was it racist? hardly.

Now for anyone that wants to tackle me head on calling me some kind of racist I will gladly debate this < I know who I am, the bad and the good and racisim is not part of my make-up.
31,289 views 79 replies
Reply #1 Top
Of course it was based on racism. The evidence points to it. Try find an image of a five year old white girl being placed in handcuffs by black police officers. After you realize you simply can't find any real pictures like that it should be a bit more clear for you. Another thing. If you asked the common American off the street their prediction as to what color the child would be if and when a five year old is ever handcuffed by the authorities, they'd all say black. Because their racist-toned minds steer them that way.
Reply #2 Top
Of course it was based on racism. The evidence points to it. Try find an image of a five year old white girl being placed in handcuffs by black police officers. After you realize you simply can't find any real pictures like that it should be a bit more clear for you. Another thing. If you asked the common American off the street their prediction as to what color the child would be if and when a five year old is ever handcuffed by the authorities, they'd all say black. Because their racist-toned minds steer them that way.


Brilliant logic again, Reiki. Find me an image or video of another 5 year old black girl wo has been in the same situation.

Reply #3 Top
Nice try Reiki. I know you would love to point your stinking finger towards hatred of all things American on this one, but guess what:

Quincy Lamb says his two sons were handcuffed to a box at Deveaux Junior High School after alleged fights there. Link

Student handcuffed for opposing 'gay' Jesus play Link

A 10-year-old girl was placed in handcuffs and taken to a Philadelphia police station because she took a pair of scissors to her elementary school. Link

Barkley then handcuffed the student and took him down to an office Barkley shared. Barkley kept the student there, handcuffed, for about half an hour, before letting him return to class. Link

Mr. Bronson escorted R.J. to SRO Officer Barritt’s office, where Bronson directed Officer Barritt to handcuff R.J. Officer Barritt followed this direction. R.J. remained handcuffed for approximately 30-40 seconds while Mr. Bronson checked on further commotion occurring in the hallway. Link

The Kent School District, already facing criticism for handcuffing middle- and high-school students, said the metal restraints have been used five times this school year on elementary students. Link

I: Improper Police Conduct You knowingly left an intoxicated and handcuffed student either unattended and/or unmonitored by a trained professional on three (3) separate occasions during an arrest on the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse campus on the morning of December 19, 1999: Link

A senior at Exeter High School, not allowed to participate in graduation because of grades, was handcuffed and arrested when he appeared in a cap and gown with his classmates. Link

A violent outburst at an IPS school is putting a spotlight on the ability of staffers to teach students with special needs. That incident ended with an autistic 5th grader led from the building in handcuffs Thursday. Link

These hits were only 2 pages of a quick Yahoo Search for "Student handcuffed".

Ok, these aren't all "five year old white" girls being placed in handcuffs by "Black police officers", but you can shut your prejudice pie hole with your crap about "of course it's based on racism". I'll even go so far as to say that it may or may not be, I don't know, but neither do you, so quit jumping to stupid conclusions based on your own pathetic ignorance and lack of interest in finding out the truth before you shoot off your mouth.

with a brain like yours, you could be a liberal on the Supreme Court!
Reply #4 Top
Reply By: Reiki-HousePosted: Tuesday, April 26, 2005Of course it was based on racism


AND THERE IT IS...."of course it was based on race" imagine my suprise that you should take the politicaly correct stance.
Reply #5 Top
I'll bet that up until a very short time ago you wouldn't have been able to find any pictures of a five year old black girl being handcuffed by white police officers, either. And I don't know if I represent the common American off the street, but when I heard the story and the mother's response ("My baby was set up!") I pictured your stereotypical spoiled American parents who can't be bothered to raise their children and look for someone to sue whenever things don't go quite their way. In other words, I pictured a skinny white woman with too much makeup.

And if you had just told me that a 5 year old had been arrested and nothing else, I would have pictured a little psycho serial-killer-in-training. The profile for a serial killer is usually white.
Reply #6 Top
Reply By: Eastern DiamondbackPosted: Tuesday, April 26, 2005Of course it was based on racism. The evidence points to it. Try find an image of a five year old white girl being placed in handcuffs by black police officers. After you realize you simply can't find any real pictures like that it should be a bit more clear for you. Another thing. If you asked the common American off the street their prediction as to what color the child would be if and when a five year old is ever handcuffed by the authorities, they'd all say black. Because their racist-toned minds steer them that way.Brilliant logic again, Reiki. Find me an image or video of another 5 year old black girl wo has been in the same situation.


and even if there was one more example that does NOT MAKE IT RACEISM it makes it 2 examples of bad judgement.
Reply #7 Top
Sorry for replying to Reiki's idiocy before agreeing with you MM.

As I said, I don't know if there was racism involved or not, but the jump to cash in on the race card sure seems to be taken a lot. The likes of Jesse Jackson have become rich convincing any Black person who will listen that all their problems are because of racism. What a cop out!!!
Reply #8 Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Tuesday, April 26, 2005Nice try Reiki.


but these examples cannot count to the p.c. crowd because it was white on white of some such NONSENSE.

I really think it\'s because of reiki like people that this hit has become pandemic. just try and scream racist if a black cop did this to a white girl. the liberal left would have yer nuts for soup.
Reply #9 Top
Reply By: PJ_Posted: Tuesday, April 26, 2005I'll bet that up until a very short time ago you wouldn't have been able to find any pictures of a five year old black girl being handcuffed by white police officers, either. And I don't know if I represent the common American off the street, but when I heard the story and the mother's response ("My baby was set up!") I pictured your stereotypical spoiled American parents who can't be bothered to raise their children and look for someone to sue whenever things don't go quite their way. In other words, I pictured a skinny white woman with too much makeup.And if you had just told me that a 5 year old had been arrested and nothing else, I would have pictured a little psycho serial-killer-in-training. The profile for a serial killer is usuall


now here is a prime example of uncoucious racisim... if a white made this comment publically he/.she would be crusified.
Reply #10 Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Tuesday, April 26, 2005Sorry for replying to Reiki's idiocy before agreeing with you MM.


naaaaaa ted rekie does make american blood boil.. reiki aprime example of america hating
Reply #11 Top
I know some cops (the older & wiser ones) who purposely try their best not to ticket or arrest blacks because they don't want to deal with any potential accusations. They tell me they're not paid well enough for that hassle (unlike the lawyers and judges that will crucify them) and just want to go home at the end of their day without it being blasted all over the news what evil racist they are. Sad but true.
Reply #12 Top
Reply By: ShovelheatPosted: Tuesday, April 26, 2005I know some cops (the older & wiser ones) who purposely try their best not to ticket or arrest blacks because they don't want to deal with any potential accusations. They tell me they're not paid well enough for that hassle (unlike the lawyers and judges that will crucify them) and just want to go home at the end of their day without it being blasted all over the news what evil racist they are. Sad but tr


I just saw a cops where a handicapped cop ran a blackman down for possession and the black started screaming raceisim. because the cop is white.. this shit makes me puke. racist indeed!
Reply #13 Top
To a man/woman when the speaker is black the charge of racisim comes to the front lines, not a misjudgement, not poor training, because the cops were white, IT HAD TO BE RACIST BEHAVIOR.


To a man/woman? What does that mean? You don't even know who you're generalizing anymore. There's people who immediately jump to this conclusion, and there's people who don't. There's people who think Muslim every time they hear terrorist. I don't hear you complaining about them.

Since the advent of the civil rights act, blacks have learned that the one way to disarm a white person is to scream race, loud and often.THE BLACK CRIMINAL ARRESTED BY A WHITE COP, screams racisim in the hopes of a reduced sentence or to be let off completely.


And since the advent of crime, criminals have learned that insanity defenses and bogus claims of loss of control are ways to disarm the system. There is a trait that criminals share, and that is an unwillingness to be caught. When they are caught, they will employ means to assure themselves of escape. If you're a minority, one of the means available to you is to say that the police are racist.

And don't forget, there is a reason that claims of racism are easily believed. Maybe you should look into why it is still so easy to believe that law enforcement officials are racist instead of singling out a trait all criminals share and applying it only to Blacks.

On the same note, your caps-locked statement is one of the most disgusting generalizations I've ever read from you. The Black criminal? Are you joking? How would you feel if I said THE REPUBLICAN VOTER is a homophobic, Bible-thumping follower who has no problem accepting violence as long as it is directed towards the homosexual and pro-choice individuals that they feel threatened by? You might get kind of upset at that statement, yes?

All criminals do things when they are caught, and the reason they do those things is in the hopes of getting a reduced sentence or being let off completely. You've managed to single in on one thing that is readily available to minority criminals. Again, I would say the question is not why is it done, but why is it still so effective?


Reply #14 Top
I just saw a cops where a handicapped cop ran a blackman down for possession and the black started screaming raceisim. because the cop is white.. this shit makes me puke. racist indeed!


You are aware that cops selectively picks the "best" and "most entertaining" crimes to feature, right? If you're basing your knowledge of crime on "Cops", I'd say you have bigger problems than this to deal with.

Maybe the thing for you to notice next time you watch is the ration of black to white criminals featured on the show, as well as the ratio of black to white police officers. This might offer some insight into what I still believe is the real issue, which is the fact that claims of racism are so easily believed.

I know some cops (the older & wiser ones) who purposely try their best not to ticket or arrest blacks because they don't want to deal with any potential accusations. They tell me they're not paid well enough for that hassle (unlike the lawyers and judges that will crucify them) and just want to go home at the end of their day without it being blasted all over the news what evil racist they are. Sad but true.


This is sad and frightening, but I maintain that the question to ask is why is it so easy to believe in racism as a cause? There is a reason that all of these claims are taken so seriously, namely that enough of them are more than just claims.


Reply #15 Top
How would you feel if I said THE REPUBLICAN VOTER is a homophobic, Bible-thumping follower who has no problem accepting violence as long as it is directed towards the homosexual and pro-choice individuals that they feel threatened by? You might get kind of upset at that statement, yes?


Actually, we hear this kind of generalization every day, 's called the Press, and it is not only accepted, but to try to argue against it also gets you called, "Homophobic" and "Hypocrite".

So, I guess things are tough all over. ;~D
Reply #16 Top
if a white made this comment publically he/.she would be crusified.


I assume you mean if I white person made the comment about black people? I'm "a white," if that makes any difference.
Reply #17 Top
Actually, we hear this kind of generalization every day, 's called the Press, and it is not only accepted, but to try to argue against it also gets you called, "Homophobic" and "Hypocrite".


I don't think it's that bad.
Reply #18 Top
13 by Philomedy
Tuesday, April 26, 2005


To a man/woman? What does that mean? You don't even know who you're generalizing anymore.


the above means that males and femals that are black agreed, it was racist,, do not be so damn quick to judge philo,

On the same note, your caps-locked statement is one of the most disgusting generalizations I've ever read from you. The Black criminal? Are you joking?


since I AM SPEAKING ABOUT BLACKS becomming professional victims black criminal seems approiate.
Again, I would say the question is not why is it done, but why is it still so effective?


it's effective because of the collective guilt whites feel about slavery. geeze philo sometimes a comment is just that,, not some deep arcane thing.
Reply #19 Top
16 by PJ_
Tuesday, April 26, 2005


assume you mean if I white person made the comment about black people? I'm "a white," if that makes any difference.


NOTICE THE WORD "public" nice editing of my comment to suit your ends.
Reply #20 Top
#15 by ParaTed2k
Tuesday, April 26, 2005


How would you feel if I said THE REPUBLICAN VOTER is a homophobic, Bible-thumping follower who has no problem accepting violence as long as it is directed towards the homosexual and pro-choice individuals that they feel threatened by? You might get kind of upset at that statement, yes?


Actually, we hear this kind of generalization every day, 's called the Press, and it is not only accepted, but to try to argue against it also gets you called, "Homophobic" and "Hypocrite".

So, I guess things are tough all over. ;~D


and who turns every event involving a black and a white into a dog and pony show?/ THE media!! but philo knows this.
Reply #21 Top
Notice how I made the comment publicly. And I quoted the sentence I was directly replying to, because it was kind of far removed from where my post would appear and I wanted to give it some context. Anyone who read my post would have already read your post, of course, so as a courtesy to people who don't like to read the same thing twice I quoted as little as possible. I'm not sure what you're getting at, though. What does the second sentence lose if it's said without the first sentence?

I can't believe I'm in a debate about this. Honestly, the "too much makeup" part was more central to the image I pictured than the "white" part. If anyone wants to accuse me of being prejudiced against women who wear too much makeup, I'd be glad to respond to that.
Reply #22 Top
the above means that males and femals that are black agreed, it was racist,, do not be so damn quick to judge philo,


"To a man/woman when the speaker is black the charge of racism comes to the front lines" means "Black females and males agreed that it was racist." Is that what you're saying? Gee, how did I miss that? Were you going to mention the Black males and females who don't think it's racist?

since I AM SPEAKING ABOUT BLACKS becomming professional victims black criminal seems approiate.


Using a phrase such as "the Black criminal" makes you sound like you're posturing as some sort of authority figure on crime, as opposed to someone with an opinion. And speaking of Black people becoming professional criminals, I don't see how you've even begun to address that issue. All you're doing is mentioning something that SOME minority criminals do to try to get themselves off the hook. Do you want me to write a list about the things white criminals do to get off and write an article about how whites are becoming professional criminals?

It's also refreshing how you've decided to stop differentiating between Black people and Black criminals. Good strategy, that.

it's effective because of the collective guilt whites feel about slavery. geeze philo sometimes a comment is just that,, not some deep arcane thing.


Its effective because when minorities are arrested, there is enough occurrence of racism to make all claims of racism plausible.

Reply #23 Top
Reply By: PhilomedyPosted: Tuesday, April 26, 2005the above means that males and femals that are black agreed, it was racist,, do not be so damn quick to judge philo,"To a man/woman when the speaker is black the charge of racism comes to the front lines" means "Black females and males agreed that it was racist." Is that what you're saying? Gee, how did I miss that? Were you going to mention the Black males and females who don't think it's racist?


unfortunatly blacks that think this was not racist do not sell papers or slots on the media.

Reply By: PhilomedyPosted: Tuesday, April 26, 2005


Using a phrase such as "the Black criminal"


philo I am not going to arue with you about this, you want to feel I am some sort of closet monster.. so be it! BOOOO

it's effective because of the collective guilt whites feel about slavery. geeze philo sometimes a comment is just that,, not some deep arcane thing.Its effective because when minorities are arrested, there is enough occurrence of racism to make all claims of racism plausible.


NO IT'S EFFECTIVE EXACTLY WHY i SAID. COLLECTIVE GUILT and nop matter how you think , it's not how I think, there is no you are right and I am wrong or visa versa. we think differently. period
Reply #24 Top
Reply By: PJ_Posted: Tuesday, April 26, 2005Notice how I made the comment publicly. And I quoted the sentence I was directly replying to, because it was kind of far removed from where my post would appear and I wanted to give it some context. Anyone who read my post would have already read your post, of course, so as a courtesy to people who don't like to read the same thing twice I quoted as little as possible. I'm not sure what you're getting at, though. What does the second sentence lose if it's said without the first sentence?


public is not anonomous behind a computer screen its in newspaper print, video tape broadcast. get real
Reply #25 Top
"Black females and males agreed that it was racist."


Isn't it ironic how, if a person says, "Black Females and Males agree, Soul Food is good", that is racist, but then you lump all "Black Females and Males" together to generalize them all as having the same opinion on what is racist and what isn't, and **poof**, you can pat yourself on the back and consider yourself "enlightened".

One of the few times that I was accused of racism, and was actually guilty as charged, was when I singled out a fellow troop (who was Black) to get his opinion of the a racially charged event at the time.