And will things go 'poof' (highly technical term ) when you drag them off the dock?

And will things go 'poof' (highly technical term ) when you drag them off the dock?

Woodbridge....I suggest you seek medical advice....that stutter is quite noticeable.
I know you think you cover it well, but trustme, it shows...

Woodbridge....I suggest you seek medical advice....that stutter is quite noticeable.
I know you think you cover it well, but trustme, it shows...

I hide mine well, though...

That'll teach me to use my web browser instead of the WinCust Broswer

Feel free to clean it up though...

I think 9 times is some kind of record...

Ohh do I get a prize

anyway...back on topic

ummmmmm.... maybe this is a secret or I missed it somewhere... whendoes it come out?

haha yes things go poof when you drag them off the dock. you can make your own poof if you want or download them from some macos websites hope that made your day heh

what format are the p...s in?

png. no, pdf not allowed

JMB 1984, one word - when?

cool

ME likes
When????

I just want to say that im not a big fan of macintosh, so I don't really get it... but if they actually incorporated those features of the drag and drop, and the icon effects, one could make the most kick a$$ object bar theme ever. Same goes for desktop x if they put these features into destop x then desktop x would be the most awesome creation ever (well not that it already isn't, besides the integrated circuit- without either we wouldn't be here today ) but think of the possibilites... and with those features implemented into those programs we wouldn't have to download any new programs, just the updates...

thanks for all the info JMB1984

Just wondering, is it gonna come out this year or what?!?

I can't wait!!

9 times?

Damn. That beats my 8. It's a pity I couldn't see it. Oh well

Anyway. From now on, when referring to windows 98 or ME, you must ALL (too bad if you're not reading this, you can find out from everyone else) use the \ to separate them, instead of /

Is that clear? /me tries an evil glare but fails badly and ends up laughing at his own stupidity.

/me thinks "hmmm, I wonder how many people will actually listen to me."

/me decides it dosen't matter and returns to his labratory where he can make an evil clone race where everyone is living in a dictatorship as far as using slashes and talking about windows versions is concerned.

/me thinks Ryan8024 is smoking his crop again...

Hi Frogboy and all wincustomizers!
You said: it can use icon and png's files. This sounds good (the .png option), but i have some questions:
-The .ico files will have different sizes (from 16x16 to .... 128x128 maximum on XP). I think that OdjectDock will change the graphic (ex. for a maximization at 58x58 it will use the 64x64 size, or at 128x128 will use 64x64 too if it is the maximum size included on the ico file) via software routines.
-It is needed some different sizes for the .png files? Ok, don't shoot me, it's very knowed: NO. I assume that a 128x128 size it's right for all reductions. Some software reductions used on dock apps don't make correctly the reductions from 128x128 png (the best on this task is Yzdock, more than OSX dock!). WELL: only a .png file it's needed, so i think: How Stardock/Wincustomize will make available .png files for using with ObjectDock? I know that it's not convenient for Stardock to create a new 'Icon general section', because it's contrary to IconPackages; but the 'Graphic section is hidden by deffault, and it's intended to be a general sharing of graphic resources section... this is not the right section for .png. and .ico files distribution!
-A section with only .png files is contrary to Stardock's skinning way: make availabe packages with enhanced skins that can be used only with their software. PNG is free... how Stardock/Wincustomize will assimilate a section for png files?
Thanks