You're Banned!: The Forum Game
Okay, here's what you do for this game: You have to "ban" the person who posted above you for an outrageous, silly, or funny reason. Got it?
Okay, here's what you do for this game: You have to "ban" the person who posted above you for an outrageous, silly, or funny reason. Got it?
Banned for not being an exception.
Banned for promoting exceptions. What happens when exceptions become the rule?
Banned for fear of rules and for not promoting exceptions. Also banned for talking about crappy repetitive Japanese cartoons based on their ancient primitive culture and beliefs. I grew out of watching DB/DBZ, Naruto and all that stuff a long time ago. Your turn.
Banned for open hostilities, grudges, criticisms and attempts at enforcing your ideals.
You're nicked guv.
Banned because there are plenty of exceptions to the "crappy repetitive" problem. The original Ghost in the Shell was neither, although the series did get a bit formulaic. Same thing applies to popular novels, 'normal' TV shows, and Hollywood films. Gotta winnow a lot of chaff to score the good bits.
Edit: Oatsey banned for being a bobby.
Banned for again, trying to mention stuff that only you(and maybe someone else) understand.
Banned for not understanding actual English.
Banned for actually Englishing Understoodments.
banned for putting a spin on things.
I said the same thing a page ago. Good to see we're on the same page... oh, wait.
Banned for taking it the wrong way.
Banned for poor puns.
Also, I'll ban KrdaxDrkun because if I didn't come up with random English crap which nobody understands I'd just be like an American with a funny voice and spelling issues.
banned for you're rarely the culprit. And I like to think some of us do okay.
Krdax, I was going for the 'Englishing' thing. 'English' is a term in the game of billiards for putting spin on a ball. So, it was a poor pun.
Banned for being able to take nonsense and make sense out of it. Doesn't that make you an economist?
Banned because an economist takes logic and confuses it.
Banned because you seem to be correct, now that I think about it.
Draak must be a fictional writer.
banned for a fictional writer takes nothing and makes sense out of it.
Hmm... nonsense into sense... a woman?
Banned for being a woman.
Wait, what?
banned for not reading more carefully.
Banned contrarily because I don't know what you mean.
Banned because I'm confused, too.
And I am a fiction writer.
Banned for writing about yourself.
Banned because you are a fiction writer... (Does everyone who writes fictitiously classify as a fiction writer?)
If so, I am technically one also...
-edit-
Rage.
banned for raging.
I meant that you called me a fiction writer, but that doesn't fit the definition you gave prior. I offered up someone that does fit the definition.
And I don't know if being published matters.
Banned for rage-editting.
Banned for rage 't'-ing.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.