Marvin Cooley Marvin Cooley

HERE’S WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF GAY MARRIAGE IS LEGALIZED

HERE’S WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF GAY MARRIAGE IS LEGALIZED

http://marvin00.joeuser.com/index.asp?AID=9371
Gay marriage proponents are quick to tell us that opposition to gay marriage is not only hateful but an infringement of homosexuals' civil rights. With each passing day, we hear more and more inflammatory remarks from activists who are hell-bent on changing forever the definition of traditional marriage as we know it. What would America be like if fags were allowed to marry?

If gay marriage is adopted, 5,000 years of civilization will be affected. There will not only be social chaos from such an event, but legal validation will also result in moral anarchy in our social climate. It would usurp the traditional components of a union between a husband and a wife. Children do far better when you have a mom and a dad. When society confuses its inhabitants by changing a social order that has been the cornerstone for every major civilization since the beginning of man, the result would be a psychological view that is twisted and sick. Many idiots who have recently decided to support gay marriage have not thought things through to the logical conclusion. Gay marriage would corrupt heterosexual marriage in an effort to make fag relationships legitimate.

Legitimizing gay marriage in Scandinavian countries has been disastrous. With heterosexual marriage being socially de-emphasized in Scandinavia in the early 1990s, traditional marriage was gradually replaced by live-in relationships. Parents in those countries became less committed to their partners and to their children. If this happens in America, we would create a society where the state raises the children. This would be nothing less then sexual anarchy.

If homosexual marriage is validated, we will create a future where children as young as kindergarten are taught that two fags in bed is normal. With laws already in place that actively seek to enforce hate crimes (as loony liberals define them), churches will be forced to marry homosexual couples. Resistance from pastors would result in lawsuits, criminal charges, and hate crime prosecution. It would create a future where churches would lose their religious freedom ... and their tax-free status if pastors take a stand and refuse to marry homosexual couples.

I am convinced that gay marriage will lead to trivializing traditional marriage and will undermine society as a result. As in Europe, people would be embarrassed to be called married. In Europe there is an apostate Christian Church and a secularized immoral government. Without God, there is no absolute moral standards and the secular government makes whatever dumb laws they want to.

If gay marriage is validated in America, we would see polygamist groups in Utah taking legal action to validate those types of marriages. Further we have seen in England and other European states successful legal efforts to lower the age of consent. The Netherlands have even caused adults to form sexual unions in marriage to children.

Once marriage is broken, every type of lifestyle will seek to be confirmed no matter how bizarre and sick it may be. Perhaps this is why homosexual activists have now so deeply identified themselves with their support for trans-gender causes.

It is imperative for Christians to actively defend the institution that is the backbone for civilization itself. We need to communicate our convictions to our friends, to our pastors, and to our political leaders in Washington and our state houses. If we don't, society as we know it may no longer exist. What type of legacy ... what type of future does this leave for the children we love?

7,710 views 72 replies
Reply #26 Top
Legitimizing gay marriage in Scandinavian countries has been disastrous. With heterosexual marriage being socially de-emphasized in Scandinavia in the early 1990s, traditional marriage was gradually replaced by live-in relationships. Parents in those countries became less committed to their partners and to their children.


This is not true. But I see that a homophobic like Marv_would cling to some made up bullshit like this, please cite source Marv and show me where homosexual marriages and/or live-in relationships have affected the children of these people. From where have you pulled this info from that parents are " less committed" to their offspring if their sexual preferance isn't the traditional Man/ woman union.
If anything studies would show that parents are more committed to their children and are better cared for, more attention given and more intelligent than the traditional opposite sex union.
Homosexual unions are commonplace here, not an oddity, just a choice. We see "unions" man/man, woman/woman or man/woman as GOOD for the society and leave the teachings of the bible out of this_once again the governmnet is joining State and Church and this we see as WRONG and IMMORAL.
We laugh at America's prudeness and wonder why porno/ pedophellia fluorishes. Isn't it obvious?
Reply #27 Top
Legitimizing gay marriage in Scandinavian countries has been disastrous. With heterosexual marriage being socially de-emphasized in Scandinavia in the early 1990s, traditional marriage was gradually replaced by live-in relationships. Parents in those countries became less committed to their partners and to their children.

E. MACY........THIS STATEMENT IS 1000 PERCENT TRUE. YOU MORON LIBERALS OVER THERE CANT EVEN DEFEND YOUR SICK SELVES. IF IT WERE'NT FOR THE UNITED STATES, THE FIRST MADMAN THAT WANTED YOUR SICK COUNTRY WOULD TAKE IT WITH EASE. YOU ARE NOT EVEN MAN ENOUGH TO FIGHT. COWARDS, COWARDS, COWARDS. THE U.S. PROTECTS ALL YOU COWARDLY BASTARDS AND ALL WE GET FOR IT IS TERRORISTS THAT YOU ALLOW IN. YOU SHOULD BE CRUSHED FOR THAT!!!
Reply #28 Top
Marvin,

You have just won the Award for first Blogger i would enjoy physically harming.

BAM!!!
Reply #29 Top
MUGGAZ.............THE U.S. PROTECTS ALL YOU LIBERAL SWINE. AND THEN YOU DONT EVEN HELP US AT THE U.N. ... NATIONS LIKE CANADA, HOLLAND, DENMARK, SWEDEN, FRANCE, MEXICO, NORWAY........WHERES YOUR ARMY......YOU HAVE NONE. IF AMERICA WERE NOT HERE YOU WOULD BE LICKING HITLERS ASS!!! YOU WOULD BE LICKING STALLINS ASS!!! YOU WOULD BE LICKING THE TERRORISTS ASSES!!! YOU ARE NOTHING MORE THAN A BUNCH OF WHINEY COWARDS. I ONLY WISH THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WERE A WARLIKE PEOPLE. THEN WE WOULD RULE WEAK, PATHETIC SWINE LIKE YOU. YOU ARE ALL SO COWARDLY THAT YOU DESERVE TO BE UTTERLY CRUSHED AND RULED WITH AN IRON FIST!!!
Reply #30 Top
What r u going to do about it Marvin?

I ONLY WISH THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WERE A WARLIKE PEOPLE


entering the field of comedy wont do you any good mate...

What the above nations lack for in Armed forces, they make up for in culture and empathy... Allthough, you do make a valid point, i wish i was American so i can hide behind a big fukn army, and all people should be respectful to us, just well, because i am an American... and i can do whatever i please without any consideration whatsoever, well, because i have an army... and I am American... thats all that matters...

Hey Marvin, I am gay, i would get of on licking Hitler and Stalins ass... i am getting turned on now... oh, how you have aroused me...


BAM!!!
Reply #31 Top
Marvin: calm down. Those nations have military, some of them even have mandatory military service. What you are saying serves nothing, it doesn't even fairly represent your own beliefs (if you have been honest about them in the past). Soiling your nest isn't gonna get your message into people's minds in any more welcoming a fashion.
Reply #32 Top
1000 PERCENT TRUE


Go and revise math class.

I still don't understand why you try to control the personal life.
Reply #34 Top
SHUT UP YOU FAGOTS!!!


I must admit, i have not laughed so harder at a post in my entire life.

I can have a rainbow sash sent to you Marvin... we know where you live.

Can you feel the Love???

BAM!!!
Reply #35 Top
This Marvin Cooley is giving Christians a bad name....spouting off scripture in one breath, then cursing in another.....but then again, this dude isn't for real anyways. Y'all know that, right?
Reply #36 Top
I do not agree with what Marvin is saying, but he has a right to say it.
My personal opinion about people like Marvin is this: Give attention to their rants, and you strengthen their convictions.
Ignore him if you must.
Fight for equality in our society and one day, people like Marvin will not exsist. That's my hope.
Simple. I know.
But I can dream.
Reply #37 Top
Misfitchicks.............. reread the article. A dummy like you did not get it all. You women can be so dumb sometimes.
Reply #38 Top
YOUR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF GAY MARRIAGE IS CONVINCING. I FOR ONE LOOK FORWARD TO THE COMING SEXUAL ANARCHY YOU HAVE DESCRIBED... AND MORE.
Reply #39 Top
such anger in him...

feel the anger flow, my young jedi....

ok, but seriously, now:

here is a quote from: http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/3/122004jl.asp

"Arguments for still other types of fallout have been made if gay marriage is validated in America. Already we see polygamist groups in Utah taking legal action to validate those types of marriage. Further we have seen in England and other European states successful legal efforts to lower the age of consent. Some groups in the Netherlands have even caused rights of adults to form sexual unions in marriage to children."

here is his quote:

If gay marriage is validated in America, we would see polygamist groups in Utah taking legal action to validate those types of marriages. Further we have seen in England and other European states successful legal efforts to lower the age of consent. The Netherlands have even caused adults to form sexual unions in marriage to children.


so much for quoting sources...

found this looking to verify his "age of consent" parts:

http://www.qrd.org/qrd/world/europe/age.of.consent.laws-12.20.94
and this: https://www.joeuser.com/Forums.asp?MID=2&AID=10575#31725
Age of simple majority
The legal age of majority is eighteen (18) years.
Age of consent for sexual activities
Current legislation of the republic Of Lithuania makes no provisions with regard to the age of sexual interrelationship.
Age of consent for the marriage
The age of consent for the marriage is eighteen (18) years old. The legal age could be decreased up to fifteen (15) years with decision of the court. In case of pregnancy with decision of the court, a pregnant person could be allowed for marriage being less than fifteen (15).


age of consent laws vary wildly in europe, and even include differing ages for hetero and gay sex in some cases. interesting, never saw that before, so his rant must refer to the equalization of the ages across all the groups.

i could not find anything on scandinavian families falling apart.
Reply #40 Top
I am convinced that gay marriage will lead to trivializing traditional marriage


what, it's not trivialized today already?

http://fugmulch.joeuser.com/index.asp?AID=4054
Reply #41 Top
oh yeah, one more thing

polygamy was outlawed as a woman's rights issue, as well as an anti-mormon issue. for differing views, see here:

http://www.polygamy.org/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/mormon/features/polygamy.shtml
http://www.religioustolerance.org/lds_poly.htm
Reply #42 Top
fugmulch...............STOP BEING SUCH A BIG DUMMY AND READ THE ARICLE BELOW...........

"BUG CHASERS": HOMOSEXUALS WHO WANT TO BE HIV POSITIVE
Reply #43 Top
Legitimizing gay marriage in Scandinavian countries has been disastrous. With heterosexual marriage being socially de-emphasized in Scandinavia in the early 1990s, traditional marriage was gradually replaced by live-in relationships. Parents in those countries became less committed to their partners and to their children. If this happens in America, we would create a society where the state raises the children. This would be nothing less then sexual anarchy.


Hahahahahaha....What a joke you are. Ever actually been outside of hicksville Marvin?

What WILL actually happen if gay marriage is legalized? Gay people will marry. So what?
Reply #44 Top
Reply #45 Top
Marvin why are you editing all of your boring articles and then not changing anything, so that they show up in the recent forum posts, Can't you get comments the normal way??

For anyone reading this later, The recent forum posts are all Marvin Cooley's. Very sad attention seeker!
Reply #46 Top
You are correct, Brad. I should not use that term. The word fag and fagot is very insulting. I must learn to be more polite.
Reply #47 Top
Damn Marv... I think I agree with Mug here your like the only blooger that I would seriously want to open a can of "stomp your ignorant ass in the ground" But hey Im a nice guy and you need to read your history book more and definanly more indept... for one it was many nations fighting against Hitler and to state to you clearly as I can the two nations that held the most sway in defending britian from germanys air attach was.... drum roll please..... america and australia.... damn next time you actually say shit about the land down under you might ACTUALLY wanna read up on thier involvement in the second world war... and as for the whole homosexuality thing, man your so damn homophobic I swear if one touched you, you would pop.... lighten up man... take a chill pill, get laid for once, and live your life man, its short... no point in pissing off thousands and thousand of people in the process man

adios
Reply #48 Top
You are all idiots! By allowing gay marriage, you are not 'undefining' marriage. You are simply providing another avenue of legal contract for two people. It will not 'open the door' for polygamist. ANd it sure as hell won't lead to people marrying their dogs. This is all tripe. I'm not gay, but if I were, I would be outraged by all of you -- not by your bully tactics, but by how completely and irrevocably stupid you all seem to be.

Come on, people. I know you're not all this dumb. Let's pull together.

D
Reply #49 Top
Listen, Freaks! Polygamy is NOT legal in Utah or Arizona. In Arizona, I assume you're talking about Colorado City -- in said town, they are ILLEGALLY practicing polygamy.

Stop spreading lies and untruths. Do a little research.

D
Reply #50 Top
You are bringing false information into this argument. You're falling back on semantics about 'segregation'. A) I agree the word shouldn't be used for the gay marriage issue, because it's an exclusion, not a segregation, but B) You don't have to be an ethnic group to get segregated. That's moronic. If I put all my brown speckled eggs in one basket and all my white eggs in another basket, I've segregated my eggs.

D