Frogboy Frogboy

Has the RIAA gone insane?

Has the RIAA gone insane?

RIAA: Copying CDs to your iPod not protected under fair use

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/83570/ripping-music-for-mp3-players-is-not-fair-use-riaa.html

In an effort to ensure that nobody is sympathetic to it, the RIAA's filing to the US copyright office indicates that it does not support people beig able to take their legally purchased CDs and copy that music onto their legally purchased iPod even if they are the only one using it.

Ripping music from CDs and transferring it to an iPod does not constitute fair use, according to a document filed by the major record companies.

In a filing to the US Copyright Office, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) attempts to undo a statement it made in court during the recent successful prosecution of the Grokster p2p company.

In court RIAA lawyer Don Verrilli said: 'The record companies have said, for some time now, and it's been on their website for some time now, that it's perfectly lawful to take a CD that you've purchased, upload it onto your computer, put it onto your iPod.'

However in the Copyright Office filing the RIAA takes a contrary view.

'Nor does the fact that permission to make a copy in particular circumstances is often or even routinely granted, necessarily establish that the copying is a fair use when the copyright owner withholds that authorization,' it argues. 'In this regard, the statement attributed to counsel for copyright owners in the MGM v. Grokster case is simply a statement about authorisation, not about fair use.'

In other words, explained Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney for the EFF, a leading digital rights campaign organisation, if you want to copy a CD to your iPod, get permission first.

As one of the people who actually does not pirate music but buys it legally, this really gets on my nerves.  At some point, EVERYONE becomes a criminal in the RIAA's book.  The idea that I can't take my legally purchased Star Wars CDs and put them onto my computer to listen to in iTunes is absurd.

21,346 views 55 replies
Reply #51 Top
I saw where they are looking in to wether it's legal to listen to music from your HD on your speakers...what about those of us who have the PC hooked up to our surround home theatre systems? I guess we broke the law 2 times ? OMG how dare i want to listen to music I purchased!!! If the RIAA suceeds with their BS, it looks like I will be going back to free radio.... Id sure hate to buy any music and break the law by trying to listen to it....

sad, the music industry wants you to purchase their product's but then want to have ya arrested for actually useing it...
Reply #52 Top
Boy, if this madness is going to continue for much longer I really foresee an international boycott rising up from the ashes. The mp3 player's/techonology is an evolutionary step. Just like the lp made way for the cd. The cd will slowly fade away and it's just all too nutty. No wonder torrent sites are growing like weeds!
Reply #53 Top
The problem as I see it, though not confined purely to the music/movie industries, is that we're over-governed/over-regulated/over-ruled. The greater the governing/ruling/restriction, the greater resistance from lower down the food chain....from the have not's because they've been outpriced/ousted or restricted by greed and governing bodies who see fit to impose their will and power.

If this were truly about protecting artists' rights I could see some kind of
logic/reasoning....but it's not. This is all about upper level power and greed, thus it is self serving and has no real relevance to authors/composers/artists rights or earnings. Their slice of the revenue pie is not really on the agenda here, given that it has always been the smallest slice and a pittance for their works.

We obviously need laws, order and structure in society, but it seems the powers that be have gone legislation/restriction mad in recent times. There are very few areas of our lives left untouched by some kind of intrusive intervention from 'above' us.
Our health and family lives are affected by legislation...our work, leisure and recreational pursuits are affected/restricted by legislation.

The RIAA is just taking another step towards the creation of a police state, dictatorship within a democracy....and often what happens in the U.S. flows on to the rest of the world, via trade agreements and the like. Hence, the biggest pirating operations work out of Asia, siezing upon the opportunity to fill a void/need created by over-regulation, over-pricing and intrusive DRM measures that deter consumers worldwide.

Given that pirated/hacked versions are DRM free, they are, in fact, a better quality and safer product to purchase....so naturally an exodus towards these items will occur when the industry giants' greed over-rides their common sense. Without the consumer, an artist/author/composer is nothing, in a profitable sense, so it would seem logical to protect the consumer in order to keep the artists/industries alive.
The location of many illegal/pirate operations are well known by the industries and authorities alike, but do they attempt to close down these 'greater' threats to profits/revenue....no, they'd rather penalise honest consumers with inconveniencing and potentially harmful measures that do nothing to prevent 'genuine' piracy.


Democracy is supposed to be about liberty and the freedom of speech....but that freedom is of little or no use when nobody 'up there' is listening.
Reply #54 Top
I must say I'm a bit confused

When I buy songs at iTunes, I get a message telling me to make a backup, just in case I lose the songs I purchased.

Does Apple have the right to suggest this? How can they make that suggestion if it's wrong to do so. Does this mean I'm breaking some law when I do make a backup?

This is all just nuts. I'm not giving my songs to anyone, I'm just listening to music. It used to be enjoyable.
Reply #55 Top
This gave me a laugh.

Link