do you think that the government has any role in regulating the saftey of workplaces?
Basmas
In the UK they have banned smoking from everywork place, Bars, offices the lot and I am in complete agreement. I'm with Leakui with the pot thing as well, so long as they are not forcing it on other let them. People may have a choice in going to a smokey bar or not but the workers don't, at least if they want a job. As an aside would the anti-banners here be willing to pay for the support of somebody who was offered a full time job in a smokey atmosphere (in a bar o
If I was one of the people who designed that plane I would feel rather annoyed that it was saved by god (who after all put the geese there as well) rather that it being a well designed, well built plane
The 'news'? because somebody did something 20 years ago and somebody else writes a book about it now? Perhaps when these man eating locusts appear then it might be something that aligns with the bible but the news does match the appearance of man eating locusts.
I am not saying that there are any excuses for this behaviour just that it is not appriaote to tar the millions of homosexuals with the actions of a few. Would you agree with an article saying that belivers in the OT kill homosexuals just because a few of them have done so?
Shouldn't it be 'this is how some gays behave'?
[quote who="CharlesCS" comment="1"] And here we thought Obama would bring change. Seems more like a switch rather than a change. [/quote] ? He has been in power for what, less than a week? Didn't all this happen a while back?
[quote who="KFC Kickin For Christ" comment="2"] From a Christian biblical POV Leauki, we expect some sort of peace treaty to be confirmed ushering a period of peace (and worldwide globalism) for about 3 years. After that all "hell" breaks loose as all the nations go in to wipe Israel off the face of the map. It seems more of a reality now than any other time in history. Just so you know. [/quote Is there
From what I have read the numbers are misleading. The numbers given for Bush's party don't include security while the 150 for Obamas do.
The british paper with page 3 girls is the Sun. The daily mail is famous for small c conservativism, rabble rousing anti-muslim and immigration leaders and science stories that are dividing the world into two camps 'things that cause cancer' or 'things that cure cancer'.
Everybody can make mistakes but not every can admit them :). No matter who said it the comment is still pathetic and wrong!
[quote quoting="article"] With the appointment of Panetta and Clinton I am seeing Obama trying to clear the record. However, from what I understand Germany, France, Italy, and other nations purged them selves of liberals and chose conservative candidates. If American image in the world was so bad why did so many people of other nations choose conservatives like Bush. Even the UK,who was supposedly fed up with Blair chose a moderate conservative. [/quote]
Well here is a fox news clip where they talk about Barr making the comment, 1min 40 into it they talk about O'Donnell but don't mention her saying the same thing as they are attacking barr for saying. http://www.foxnews.com/video-search/m/21744328/ring_around_a_rosie.htm Seeing as this is dated 9th Jan it seems odd that they wouldn't have mentioned it unless it happened after the broadcast but before your post of exactly the same day. It must also have been missed by every
Perhaps they made a mistake then and have removed it when they realised?
[quote who="Moderateman" comment="22"] Basmascomment 20are you sure it is O'Donnell and not Barr? Why yes,. yes I am sure of the facts, or else I would not put it in type, that would make me like Rosie O'Donnell would it not? [/quote] Sorry have you got a link to where she said it or where you heard it from? I can find huge number of references to Barr saying it and the link below is to where she said but I can find nothing on where or when O'Donnel
are you sure it is O'Donnell and not Barr?
[quote who="MasonM" comment="20"] We haven't seen any real major technological break-throughs in a very long time. The last one was probably the atomic bomb (a means to kill more people quicker). Nothing we've developed in the past several decades is really anything truly new, just new ways of doing old things. We've stagnated as far as true technology advances go. [/quote] What about the massive amount of computer advances? Medical techologies, genetics techologies
[quote who="Island Dog" comment="48"] Does it matter? I simply find it amusing that the tactics used against Bush (the honest ones, not the Dan Rather Fraud) are being used against the left now. And how they howl! Et tu, Brute?Democrats love a controversy. Otherwise, Obama would have released it and made this a non-issue. He wants to keep this on the forefront, so people do not pay attention to his activities behind the curtain. As I shown, the left had no problem quest
[quote who="just john" comment="36"] People can be paid off. Documents can be faked. These two actions happen everyday. Why should I believe a person producing a recently created document? [/quote] What evidence would you belive? The official in charge saying it was genuine? 'cos thats been done. If they release the original would you belive that seeing as 'documents can be faked'? Even if you saw it with your own eyes would you
[quote who="KFC Kickin For Christ" comment="19"] what documents do you want him to release? 1. Obvious.....a real certified copy of his birth certificate 2. Columbia College Records 3. Columbia Thesis paper 4. Medical Records (we sure heard of McCain's, Bush and Clinton's etc checkups) 5.Harvard College Records 6. Law Practice Client List 7. Illinois State Senate Schedule 8. Illinois State Senate Records [/
what documents do you want him to release?
http://msgboard.snopes.com/politics/graphics/birth.jpg
Well it may not be such a shock but it does follow the trend of all winners being man of the year.
Sorry, are you saying it is a bad thing for congress to attempt to stop people breaking the law?
[quote who="lulapilgrim" reply="20" id="1948049"]BASMAS POSTS: Perhaps there is a cost for a homosexual man marrying a woman? The reason for a shortened life span and cost is the unhealthy, unnatural sexual practice itself... [/quote] Proved where and when? Again, just beacause (or even if) same sex couples have reduced life span in no proves that it is the sexual activity that causes that reduction. Have the studies looked at couple that practice anal sex