Ya basically when I shell out money for something that was broke at release and remains broke I definitely feel like I should also have to bug test it for free to on top of it. I think that's a reasonable position that people should definitely consider taking. Definitely shouldn't say mean things, that is super Unproductive, unlike spending time trying to fix garbage game I was scammed into buying in the hope that in some vague indeterminate future months after release I'll be able to squeeze
CoolDude420
When you strangled Civ 5 to death with your bare hands Jon, did you look it in the eye the entire time? Or did you have to look away?
[quote who="Heavenfall" reply="7" id="2872572"]I've said my piece, I'm not going to debate Civ5 more on this forum.[/quote] Your piece was stupid and you should feel stupid. But before you take your ball and go home why don't you play in the street a little first. And by "street" I mean "airport runway."
[quote who="Trojasmic" reply="1" id="2872547"]Think of Civ 5 like Chess. It plays more like a game of Chess to me than Civilization. That's how I personally got over the "why did you kill Civ 5 Jon?" attitude myself. I think they should have called it Civilization Chess I instead of Civilization V.[/quote] Wow why are you wasting your abiltiy to make reality conform to fantasy on trying to make Civ 5 into a good game. Make yourself king of Mars or something.
In fact Civ 5 is so succesful no one plays multiplayer for it and the steam achievements reveal no one plays it more than a few times. Can the sheer amount of pure Success contained within this game really exist within our fragile physical reality?
Yeah all those morning sickness meds that caused birth defects sold like hot cakes too. Huge success!
Why did you kill Civ 5 Jon?