The colours combination is excellent. It reminds me the great Toxic blind by Kitty - one of my all time favorite blinds. Hope this time a great matching iconpack will be provided ( I'm still missing a Toxic one ) Keep up the great work!!! [e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e] [e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e] [e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e]
Agreed. Congrats to Sam Stosur.
[quote who="WebGizmos" reply="78" id="2991886"]Will be uploaded shortly! [/quote] Steve, first time I saw the WindowBlind I was amazed (as usual with Cindi's skins). now I'm in heaven... Both you and Cindi are a true JEWEL for the Community [e digicons]B)[/e] [e digicons]:sun:[/e] [e digicons]:beer:[/e] P.S. If you will upload your theme including Cindi's wall, could
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="11" id="2991373"]Quoting inthebloodofeden, reply 8Everything OK here with Opera - on XP SP3 as well as on W7; both 32bit - . I guess it could be an hardware and/or software configuration related issue. btw, one question Doc: about Comodo Dragon setting (maybe you are running it) what do you think about the option "Enable malware domain filtering (Comodo Secure DNS)" ? Did you checked it? Use it all the time with Comodo Dragon (you can al
Everything OK here with Opera - on XP SP3 as well as on W7; both 32bit - . I guess it could be an hardware and/or software configuration related issue. btw, one question Doc: about Comodo Dragon setting (maybe you are running it) what do you think about the option "Enable malware domain filtering (Comodo Secure DNS)" ? Did you checked it?
[quote who="DaveRI" reply="9" id="2990722"]Sorry I was just taking the page at face value. Seemed like a good idea at the time.[/quote] No problem at all DaveRI. Thanks for your post.
Thanks all for your reply and helpful info [quote who="Anakey" reply="7" id="2990523"]For all those that have looked at the link that Dave has provided, and are looking to buy the suite hoping to get a full windows 7 version, you will be sadly disappointed. The wb skin in that suite is the same as the free one that is available already it has none of the windows 7 only features and has not been updated since windows 7 came out. The only benefit of getting the suite is for the icon set
Well, I consider - and I'm sure I'm not the only one - Dragon Xtreme by WebGizmos https://www.wincustomize.com/explore/winstep/477/ and Dragon WindowBlind by Stardock https://www.wincustomize.com/explore/windowblinds/6427 2 of the greatest skin available here at WinC. Now, I'm asking Stardock for a Dragon WindowBlind update: mainly, a W7 substyle is still missing. I really hope to see the WELL DESERVED update for this excellent skin. Any chance for it? Thanks in advance to anyone
Not sure if you already named it, Dominion is good, but I really would like Inferno, Suspiria or Revenge on this one. The skin looks like a gem (a jewel from Hell, of course) with a lovely devilish touch...Just excellent, Lady X. [e digicons]B)[/e] [e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e] [e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e] btw, HAPPY BIRTHDAY ( big sorry for delay) !!!
Winstep Xtreme and Windowblinds ex-aequo
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="3" id="2979709"]What was the original (Mod) rating, and what were the subsequent ones (by viewers)?[/quote] Yeah, that's what I would like to know, Doc. However, I sent a PM to a mod, so I hope to get more detailed info in a not too much long time. However, I think there is something wrong... The main point is: if the mods rating was less than 5 (though I can't believe that, truly...) and th
[quote who="Philly0381" reply="1" id="2979702"]I think it's best that this be taken up with a PM to the Mod for BootSkinXP and not in the forums.[/quote] Well, that can be an opinion. There are no serious trouble involved, I just would like to understand what's going on. btw, who is a BootSkinXP mod?
My Load BootSkinXP, that appears like it has been moderated, with a 7 rating. is placed in my personal page. Another BootSkinXP of mine, Digi-Matrix, uploaded in the same time, with rating 6, is placed in Main Gallery. How is possible? Am I missing something? Is there something wrong? I'll be very gratefull to everyone will be so kind to answer.
On a machine with XP SP3 I already got 11 critical updates (Sunday) , but nothing about IE or .NET .
[quote who="Jafo" reply="76" id="2978587"] Yes, meaning 'free' is the right price...as I don't pay for other people's AV installs... [/quote] [e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e] btw, KIS 2010 9.0.0.736 is an excellent build, but why you don't update to KIS 2011 11.0.2.556? It's simply "another world", trust me...I'm not telling you to install KIS 2012 12.0.0.374;it's still the first buil
They are going to make Internet explorer "Secure for browsing" ? I don't believe that...
[quote who="Snowman" reply="57" id="2978385"] No, I'm far from "proud" to only use free security software, but as long as a free piece of software is doing the job fine (for my use) then I really don't give a shaite that a pay-ware software is doing the same job better. But I do recommend Avast Home to anyone who ask for my advise on this subject.[/quote] Well, that could be correct,,,I don't know the last versions of Avast; I used
[quote who="Gwenio1" reply="51" id="2978367"] http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=89172&st=0&p=451252&hl=kaspersky&fromsearch=1&#entry451252[/quote] I know that Gwenio1, I have no problem at all with KIS and MBAM (I got also Emsisoft Emergency Kit and Hitman Pro). I keep the real time pritection disabled because it's unusefull with running KIS, and it's better to save resources...
[quote who="Jafo" reply="48" id="2978320"]Quoting inthebloodofeden, reply 41I can assure you there is NOTHING you can get for free that can be compared with KIS . I'm running KIS ...9.0.0.736 .... it works. When setting up others' machines [that I'm not paying for their AV ] it's Comodo. Seems OK enough....at least the price is right...[/quote] Oh,the last KIS 2010... excellent release, one of my favourite. Btw, are you using de
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="43" id="2978276"] I think there's a spectrum of users as well as evolving problems. Now, there are more attack target surfaces... phones, pads, increasingly complex apps (IBM has stated that for every 1,000 lines of code, there are 1-5 bugs), and increasingly complex OS's. So, what was good protection 5 years ago isn't necessarily now.... nor is it necessarily inadequate. [/quote] Agreed.<
[quote who="Snowman" reply="42" id="2978266"]I've used Avast Home (FREE) for several years, and find it more than adequate for my use. I guess that's a big fat NO to your (or anyone elses) recommendation about shelling out cash on other options. [/quote] What are you talking about ,Snowman? Are you jocking? Are you DRUNK? I can understand that perhaps you are one of those people that are "proud" (I apologies, but sometimes it makes me l
[quote who="kona0197" reply="32" id="2978123"]I've used AVG, Avast!, and Antivir. All of them are free and scan every file as it is accessed. Is that not an "active" program? No one should have to pay money for a decent AV program. Pay versions tend to have a AV scanner surrounded by bloatware. [/quote] Well, it seems to be more specific it's REQUIRED. I don't recommend Kaspersky in a general way; what I reccomend is Kaspersky
Suggestions by DOC are very good; HijackThis can be very helpful, of course posting the log on a forum for diagnose (unless you are very experienced in this sector, but you said you are not). About Kaspersky, even my suggestion is to buy it (i'm using Kaspersky Internet Security since 2008, and never changed). If you like I can provide you a link to an online store where you can get it at very interesting prize( the store has been checked and is recognized by Kaspersky, of course)
[e digicons]:beer:[/e] [e digicons]:beer:[/e] [e digicons]:beer:[/e] [e digicons]:beer:[/e] [e digicons]:beer:[/e] [e digicons]:beer:[/e] [e digicons]:beer:[/e] [e digicons]:beer:[/e]
Really hard choice,in my opinion,between 1st and 2nd place...Congrats to all!!
WinCustomize Forums