There is a reason why people suggest that you don't bring up politics and religion at a dinner party. I think it sours the wine. Yet the issues are something that adult citizens do need to look at and consider in order to maintain proper representation in our government. There has been quite a lot of talk lately on the abortion issue. When exactly is it that
I love the way that people automatically assume that Sarah Palin has to be programmed for answering questions. I think it's more like she's groomed for a national media that she has never experienced, much the same way that the prosecution prepares a witness before taking the witness stand. They don't tell the witness what to say, they just help them know what to expect and how to handle themselves. <span style="fo
[quote who="kingbee"]sheeeeit.hopefully yall will live long enough to be around til they invent a working wayback machine thus enabling bhutto, allende, lincoln, kennedy in the company of hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of lesser known victims to help you appreciate the incredible difference between political exeution (painful and permanent for starters) and being interviewed as candidate for the office of vice-president of the united
[quote who="lesterleon"]Point-By-Point Rebuttal . 2. Yes, some candidates might run whether they believe they’re qualified or not. It’s called opportunism, and Governor Palin is a prime example. And the experience issue requires clarification. The truth is, Governor Palin has no FEDERAL government experience. Senator Obama is not a STATE Senator, either. He works for the FEDERAL Governmen
[quote who="lesterleon"]Dear PatsyD: Another presidential campaign, another round of childish bickering. The facts are that Gov. Palin has no federal government experience, and that's troubling. The facts are that Gov. Palin would, god forbid, assume the Presidency should something happen to Se. McCain. That's troubling. [/quote] So, if I am to understand you correctly, no person that has serv
Hello Peoples Party. I hope you had a great day at work. I have no idea how some states get away with having a closed party system. That alone seems unconstitutional. But, anyway, What do you think if we did away with parties all together and went back to voting on individuals and their ideas and policies?
Rev.Phil. I want to thank you for your comments... :) But as for Anne Kilkenny, the media had originally interviewed her. She has no longer been in the spotlight because after evaluation of her claims they were found to be erroneous. Other citizens that know Sarah Palin more intimately have said that "Anne is not hard to irritate." She has been known t
Glenn Beck has very well written and thought provoking article today on the CNN site regarding the smear campaign that is going on against Sarah Palin. The main points that I would like to address are: 1. "Sarah Palin believes that God told her to go to war in Iraq." Really? Hmm. I don'
Say what you wish about Bush, and I'm sure you will, but I admire that he wasn't running a popularity contest in the nation. He stuck to what he believed were in the confines of his job. As far as the war goes, I said before, we haven't seen an attack on our soil since we attacked back, and saying this you can keep in mind that I am a mother of an American soldie
Those that have studied history know that our founding fathers did not want party affliations during elections because they believed that it deterred from our independence. Political parties that are in charge create a shift in power in lieu have having a balance of power. But nonetheless, our country developed a two party system. The Federalist party was fou
I respectfully disagree with you. I believe it when you say that it was used to show Obama's attitude on the Republican party. I also agree that the term was used previously, but I think the remark was calculated to get a response after the RNC speech by Sarah Palin and her lipstick remark. It was a very clever tactic and after her speech it was immediately associated with her joke.
PolMach Forums