If your sole interest is the "sandbox" game (like myself) there's no reason not to go straight to DA.
Vinraith
while losing absolutely nothing You haven't read a single thing here, have you? This makes the case better than I could: https://forums.galciv2.com/?forumid=162&aid=98074#1194261 but the gist is simple, time and money spent on MP are time and money not spent on SP. If ever there was a game that proves that a focussed SP experience is fundamentally better than the SP component of a game with both MP and SP elements, it's GC2.
Not even close, the two are vastly different from each other. Well, yes, they're of two different genres. Nevertheless RoN retains a lot of the "feel" of Civ, incorporates an abnormal number of TBS ideas considering it's an RTS, and I have to admit has had more staying power on my hard drive than any Civ title to date. Civ's so light on history it seems reasonable to have a light game to accompany it, I suppose. At least that's my opinion. <br/
Yup, I've requested this before, and still think it's a neat idea.
Too bad they won't give you chicks for free. On the other hand, after seeing those aliens, I guess you'd really have to be in dire straits to want that. *golf clap*
That doesn't mean we shouldn't be trying to find ways to "reduce our footprint". I support that. But what I don't support is the vilification of CO2 while forgetting about the dangers of sulfur dioxide, methane, NOx, etc. Then we've really got no problem, because every other element of this discussion
If humans are the cause of global warming, then there shouldn't be any interruption of an upward trend. Period. I'm sorry, I don't understand that at all. That would only be the case if the only variable affecting the climate was human interference, I don't think anyone's making that claim. If human
Much as I virulently disagree with a lot of the stuff on the front page of JoeUser (and boy do I), I can't fathom where Kinjuru is coming from here. If seeing an opinion different from yours is "offensive" then... well... you probably want to get off the internet if you want to avoid being offended. It's not reasonable to expect Stardock, or anyone for that matter, to coddle you to the degree he seems to expect. I will say, though, that I'm really not sure it's in Stardock's best inter
His main point is that science is becoming more political than scientific. Speaking as someone that works in the sciences I would say that's wrong. What's becoming more political is science reporting, by and large. Unfortunately, people have a hard time separating the two since most folks can't simply read peer reviewed articles and make up their own minds. To generalize, reporting from the left tends to try to take science and draw conclusions from
A nice article from RealClimate on the "Global Cooling" period: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/01/the-global-cooling-myth/en/
The problem with global warming is that environmentalists are trying to act that its cause is a known fact. That sounds like a problem with environmentalists, not global warming. Indeed this entire piece is a criticism of a scientific phenomenon by someone that disagrees with the political representa
A little background: I never got a chance to play the orignal Civ (I didn't have my own PC at the time, so my gaming universe was dictated by what my uncle bought and he wasn't into strategy games). When I finally got my own system I picked up Civ 2 and was enamored of it for a very long time. I bought Civ 3 when it came out, excited to reignite that same feeling that Civ 2 gave me, and was disappointed to find it suprisingly dull. I never could put my finger on what was wrong with it,
a diplomatic victory (the victory for painty waisted non-men) Those are always unsatisfying IMO, but they're easy to avoid. Just turn the little buggers off.
Thanks to everyone for their input. I at least feel like I can make an informed decision now.
steam forces the updates down your throat in order to help with their online anti-cheating software (VAC) -- at least for online games -- me, I only play Counterstrike and other half-life games on it, and its never bugged me about anything other than slowing my PC down on startup when it loads, but what auto-loading program doesn't? I've been told by numerous other Steam users that auto-load can be turned off.
If you have older Valve games from before Steam(Half Life) it will take those games and transfer the files and such to where it essentially can only be played through steam just like the newer ones. It only does this with older Valve games, not other games I might own that are also available via Steam? Say, Civ 4 or X3?
Hmm, ok. Thanks Mystik, it sounds like you've pinned down the only substantive problem, now I just need to decide whether I can live with the inconvenience.
The main problem is that steam automatically updates your game regardless of if you wanted the update or not. This is the case even if you're running the game in "offline mode?" I wouldn't think it would know. You can't manually patch down?
TBS: GalCiv2 DA because it's the best single player 4x turn based game I've ever played, and I've been gaming for 20-some years RTS: Europa Universalis 2 and Crusader Kings, because they're very good historical simulations of periods I enjoy and the diversity of gameplay is huge RTT (that's real-time tactical): Dawn of War Dark Crusade (because it's the best substitute for actually playing table top 40k I've ever found), and Rise of Nations (because it's like Civ but, IM
Alt-Tab and yeah, you've going to want to run it in Windowed mode if you want to flip back and forth.
Does anyone here have any experience with Valve's "Steam" software? I'm wondering exactly how intrusive it really is. How does it compare to, say, SDC?
I'm a fan of it, it does an excellent job of scratching the Diablo 2 itch. It's getting harder and harder to find a primarily SP, non-persistant world game that does that.
I'm not entirely sure what you mean. You don't have to "activate" abilities in-game, if that's the issue. They're always "on."
How odd, I've never had any serious problems. I can't imagine playing DL at this point, really. I feel sorry for you.
Incidentally there's no trading AI to overhaul Which probably is the problem right there. No doubt about it, but changing that is definitely outside the scope of a patch.