Fairyy~ Fairyy~

Cheeky or Cheesey

Cheeky or Cheesey

Not really an earth shaking matter ..but..
I just took a look at screen shot section. I know thats the least important section to most of you.Im wondering if the rules have changed or if there is a glitch in the ratings.
I Make it no secret that I dislike " cheesecake " screen shots of women in half nude poses. But it has been allowed since i've been here. Nudity doesnt bother me at all. Artistic nudes are quite pretty. Im talking about walls with women spread eagled in cutsie poses. I think there is a time and a place for everything. But..99% of the time, I just skip over those I find put women in a sexual way ...its no different if i were to make screen shots using naked men lying on a bear skin rugs. Not that I could even find such a wall. I tried..believe me......
I know that men and women are from different planets...I know that most dont care for my type of shots with fairies and dragons and flowers. And thats just fine.....

My question is.....could a moderator please check the SS section when they get a chance to see if there is a glitch or if someone is doing drive by ratings. I cant believe that there is that many shots with 1 or 2 star ratings. Seems out of place. If rules have changed and this type of shot is not acceptable..perhaps a notation from a moderator would be warranted. Some need a load of bricks dropped on them before they would actually take they low rating as a hint. I cant in all honesty rate a screen shot with cheeky women....

Thanks ..if and when someone gets a chance to look.
26,680 views 104 replies
Reply #101 Top

i realise that you have an elitist attitude which is in total contradition to what i thought the skinning community was about in the first place. A place where creativity, innovation, inspiration and artistry could combine in a beneficial form for all those who live in the computer world. Not only did you have no reason to vilify Torben's shot but to comment on it in such a way as to actually discourage one of the most talented and productive composers of screenshots on this site makes me wonder what it is in your life that you lack?


Im thinking what is it in HIS life that is lacking ?

Im guessing ....well..i'll just keep on guessing....
Reply #102 Top
[Fuzzy Logic]

Your screenshot is a victim of the same bug mentioned earlier, that is, the moderator's rating has been ignored by the site in favour of a single one star rating. Not right and a bug which I hope is fixed soon.


and a one star rating that was not from me...
Think perhaps that was worth mentioning in view of the rest of his post that seems to be directed at me.
Reply #103 Top
While we are airing dirty laundry..might as well finish airing it.
I have sent emails to a moderator on this slight irritation..I also have told " them" that I could care less if I EVER had another screen shot put on front page as daily shot. But..WC consists of more than the same 3 or 4 people that are constantly put on for daily shot. I can pretty much say its the spammers that are daily shot because they bury everyone elses shots. Im sure daily shot is just a quick pick from first few pages most days. They're are other people that have done some great shots that are constantly bypassed. I will not use the " woman " thing here but that is one factor. One week the SAME person was daily shot 3 days in a row. 3 different shots ..3 in a row. No wonder most just dont bother anymore.
The male groupies seem to think they are the " team" and why not ? You have given them the impression that they are " special"
A few women here have NEVER been daily shot. This is wrong..and i think if you all stop to think about, you'll see my point.
Reply #104 Top
The question about a glitch in the rating system has been answered many times over, so this thread has served its purpose.