joeKnowledge joeKnowledge

Is It Really As Simple As 'Work hard and you will make it'?

Is It Really As Simple As 'Work hard and you will make it'?

Myth of class mobility?

http://news.com.com/2061-10788_3-5715278.html
If I said it once, I must have said it more than twice; working hard is not enough. Working hard is a key element to 'making it', but it is not THE element nor is it the only one.

The way I look at it, this is how it works:
Hard Work: 50%
Oppertunity: 25%
Take Risk: 10%
Connections: 10%
Other: 5%
(Other could be anything from winning the lotto to some odd beating event happening)
(Yes I pulled those stats out of my ass.. but I told you that already)

Hard work helps to get you there or gives you a chance to take advantage of an oppertunity or an inside connection, but the reality is that you can make it without hard work based only on oppertunity or connections (Or other).

In fact you can work hard all your life and still be poor. The US is based on captailism and taking risk, but the reality is that if you take a risk, you can end up poor... I guess that is why Poor People are Stupid. It is not whether you will make a mistake, it is about how fast can you get back up or fix it.

Never the less, it would sem that Americans believe that working hard is enough:

According to the Times, Americans have a hard time accepting the notion that their society isn't terribly fluid. "Americans have never been comfortable with the notion of a pecking order based on anything other than talent and hard work," the authors write. "Class contradicts their assumptions about the American dream, equal opportunity and the reasons for their own successes and even failures. Americans, constitutionally optimistic, are disinclined to see themselves as stuck."

It's interesting that both the Times and Wall Street Journal are running series related to the relative health of the "American dream." These follow a set of stories in a similar vein, about workers and families facing increased economic insecurity, in the Los Angeles Times.


My key thing, even when it comes to Social Services, is that without giving people an oppertunity to add to the hard work that they should be doing, there is NO hope. Taking a risk literaly means becomig more edebted or worst. (and there are no real 'connections' to be made to find out where an opertunity exists)


It is not about ending Social Programs, it is about making them better. The people I met on public asssisance actually want to work and want good jobs. Most were kicked off of public assistance (like myself) when we found a job that paid us more than 67 dollars a week (mine pays about 100). What do some do? Find a part time job taking scrap metal to the junk yard or giving out free newspapers at the subway station.

There are always going to be people who abuse the system and drive Excalades while excepting food stamps, or people who have kids on perpose just to get aid (or catch deadly deseases or purposly hurt themselves to collect money) but without oppertunity to make something of yourselves, we all loose. We must give an oppertunity to those who work hard to make it.

So between living like your on The O.C. and being poor and stupid, is it really just about working hard and you will make it?
8,960 views 29 replies
Reply #26 Top
Oh and about the spelling... I thought about that at work today and you guys got a point (especially with the knowledge archive thing). I really let my writing skills slip way too much I took a Civil test for the state (one I should have passed with flying colors) and got a 67 even though I 'knew' everything on the test.

I was very disappointed when I got the result.

I'll take your advice and be more precise (and get that grammar book too)
Can't hurt....


Anyway, back to the thread...
If what people mean by hard work is:
hard work - work smart - opportunity - support - take risk - other (like research, self evaluation, hitting the Lotto, rich uncle, real estate)

Then yes, hard work and making it is true.

It can be done, but how many can actually do it?

Thank you everyone for posting on this blog post!
Reply #27 Top

And by the way 30k a year is working poor, so is 50k a year. you need to be making 80k or more to be true middle or upper middle class.
150k or better for a real upper middle class single income.

I think that you are a bit off with your definitions.....either that or you don't live in the US.  The middle class is defined as households with income between 75 percent and 125 percent of the current median household income.  The current median household income is about $42,500.  That means that "middle class" is roughly $32,000 to $53,000.  $30,000 per year is upper lower class, not too far from lower middle class. 

Reply #28 Top
joe,

If we're going to quibble on the definition of "hard work", we might equally quibble on the definition of "making it". You see, I see "success" as having the bills paid and the family fed. That's all. Nothing more. Another man would view success in quite a different light.

Personally, I've been up and I've been down. Right now, I'm down, rending upward. The reason I'm trending upward is that I refuse to STAY down. In short, failure is NOT an option. That's the way to "make it", in my opinion.
Reply #29 Top

Saying you have to make $50k to not be poor is having unreasonable expectations.

A single guy making $30k per year is not doing badly. As Karma points out, the typical HOUSEHOLD income is well less than $50k.

Working hard is a pre-requisite for success IMO.  You certainly don't have to do anything nasty or unreasonable to have a middle-class lifestyle.