Moderateman Moderateman

For the Guns must be banned idiots

▼

For the Guns must be banned idiots

take this test

from JoeUser Forums
For all you morons that think guns are the great evil of our times and have blamed guns for crime, murder, rape and other acts take the following test.

Get a weapon, any weapon will do... gun, knife, baseball bat.

Put said weapon on a table top.

Sit back watching weapon intently.

Wait for weapon to do harm all of its own accord.

when weapon does not attack you or anyones else, maybe, just maybe YOU WILL SEE WHAT AN IDIOT YOU ARE.
misc
15,806 views 46 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top

you forgot one thing MM, for guns, they have to be loaded.....

You can always use them like a club!

Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top

You would obviously support Iran having nuclear technology. If everybody else has them then so should Iran. Thats your line of thinking.

You must be a one trick pony as well, as this is the second time I have seen you use that argument.  It was stupid before it is stupid now.

For the same reason you would not give a gun to a convicted felon, Iran should not have nukes.

Object Desktop - Get all of our enhancement utilities in one suite
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top
#23 by kingbee
Saturday, May 21, 2005


well...after watching an assortment of firearms, blades, arrows, etc., i progressed to explosives. for the past 11 hours and 37 minutes, i've been watching some sorta timed detonation kinda thing i found in the closet. it began keeping time when i lifted it outta the box (it now reads 11:39).

this is realllly boring so i'm only gonna give this about another half hour; if nothin happens by then, i'll have to concede your point.


lmao kingbee, thank you for the morning giggles.
Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top
#24 by Furry Canary
Saturday, May 21, 2005


'like I said watch the gun carefully for 2 weeks do not eat nor wash.. nor drink water while watching for the "evil" gun to jump off table and go find something to kill.. the reason you will not have to worry is the "evil" gun will see you are weak from hunger, dieing of thirst and stink like something already dead and will not bother you.'
This is a scary yet strangely familiar kind of gibberish ... Hmm, has anybody every seen ModerateMan and Aeryck together, in the same room at the same time? Admit it, you're one and the same!


yikes more humor... ok this is starting to scare me..lololol
Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
#25 by BakerStreet
Saturday, May 21, 2005


The problem I have is when a minority imposes their will on the majority, whether it be concerning gun control, drug legalization, whatever.


and in a nutshell baker sums up my feelings exactly. thank you baker. insightfull
Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top
#27 by Dr. Guy
Monday, May 23, 2005


For the same reason you would not give a gun to a convicted felon, Iran should not have nukes.


I will gladly "give" Iran a nuke. heh heh heh heh
Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top
22 by ParaTed2k
Saturday, May 21, 2005


Now, at the end of the day, ask yourself how many people were injured by your actions. Now, try to think of the last time you heard of a concealed weapon, of any kind, harming another living creature.

Wow, 0? Hmmmm, and people think that carrying concealed weapons is dangerous?

this makes to much sense ted, and will confuse the "ban gun crowd"
Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top

I will gladly "give" Iran a nuke. heh heh heh heh

I think they want a different method of delivery than what you are considering!

Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top
#33 by Dr. Guy
Monday, May 23, 2005


I will gladly "give" Iran a nuke. heh heh heh heh

I think they want a different method of delivery than what you are considering


maybe western union,,, candy gram... LANDSHARK!!
Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top

maybe western union,,, candy gram... LANDSHARK!!

ROFL!

Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top
Maybe we should consider what kind of guns. I have no problem with someone having a pistol for home protection, but anyone who thinks they need something like an AK-47 for home protection is either lying about his real intent or a loon.
Reply #37 from JoeUser Forums Top
If you're going to argue along those lines then why dont we legalise crack and heroine? The drugs can only kill someone if they overdose. So it must be the persons fault not the drugs. Why should the fact that you cant handle your drugs stop me from selling and "doing" mine?


Frankly, I see nothing wrong with legalizing drugs. I feel that adults have a right to make decisions for themselves, even when those decisions are stupid. Let's face it, BACON kills more people in this country than heroin does!
Reply #38 from JoeUser Forums Top
If you get rid of legal guns you severly diminish the availability of guns for crims.


Well, let's get rid of cars too! That way if there are no cars, people can't steal cars and commiit crimes with them! It'll give the police a rest too, they won't have nearly as many car chases to deal with!

See how assinine that argument can be??
Reply #39 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: IçonoçlastPosted: Monday, May 23, 2005Maybe we should consider what kind of guns. I have no problem with someone having a pistol for home protection, but anyone who thinks they need something like an AK-47 for home protection is either lying about his real intent or a loon.


much as I hate to agree.. Full automatic weaps should be banned, period from war as well.
Reply #40 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Gideon MacLeishPosted: Monday, May 23, 2005If you're going to argue along those lines then why dont we legalise crack and heroine? The drugs can only kill someone if they overdose. So it must be the persons fault not the drugs. Why should the fact that you cant handle your drugs stop me from selling and "doing" mine?Frankly, I see nothing wrong with legalizing drugs. I feel that adults have a right to make decisions for themselves, even when those decisions are stupid. Let's face it, BACON kills more people in this country than heroin does!


altho I disagree with legalizing ALL drugs... imagine if we did sell drugs.. we could eliminate the deficit in one year.
Reply #41 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: dharmagrlPosted: Monday, May 23, 2005If you get rid of legal guns you severly diminish the availability of guns for crims.Well, let's get rid of cars too! That way if there are no cars, people can't steal cars and commiit crimes with them! It'll give the police a rest too, they won't have nearly as many car chases to deal with!See how assinine that argument can be??


yeh and ban mini skirts too because they inspire lust and cause rapes. and ban forks too because I am sure somewhere someone was stabbed to death by a fork. {tongue firmly planted in cheek} ORRRRRRRR disclaimer for those with no sense of humor.
Reply #42 from JoeUser Forums Top
Ban mini-skirts and bikinis because they cause drivers to take their eyes off the road and crash.
Reply #43 from JoeUser Forums Top

Ban mini-skirts and bikinis because they cause drivers to take their eyes off the road and crash.

Do and Die!

Reply #44 from JoeUser Forums Top
We really should just ban people. They're the ones causing all the problems anyway.
Reply #45 from JoeUser Forums Top
#42 by Içonoçlast
Monday, May 23, 2005


Ban mini-skirts and bikinis because they cause drivers to take their eyes off the road and crash.


would make more sense to ban eyes thaT WAY no one could "see" the offending flesh. hahahahahahaha
Reply #46 from JoeUser Forums Top
#44 by MasonM
Monday, May 23, 2005


We really should just ban people. They're the ones causing all the problems anyway.


nooooooooooooooooo.... I like most people.. maybe if we could just ban people that think banning something is the solution to all the worlds woes.