Post Partum Fetus is not a Child

Thus says the ACLU

http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?tl=1&display=rednews/2005/05/02/build/wyoming/39-meth.inc
from JoeUser Forums

IN what can only be the logical extension of the devaluation of life exhibited in Gideon MacLiesh's article of using Foster children like lab rats, and declaring that anyone that is incapable of feeding themselves is not worthy of life, the ACLU has now declared that a fetus that has transitioned to the post partum stage is not a person.

In a case in Wyoming, a mother has been charged with Child endangerment after her new born son tested posiive to high levels of Methamphetemine.

IN the words of the article:

Foust was in court for a preliminary hearing on a charge of child endangerment. She was arrested last October shortly after she gave birth to a son after blood tests allegedly showed both Foust and the infant had meth in their bloodstreams.

To which the ACLU responded by stating:

The American Civil Liberties Union has criticized Fremont County Attorney Ed Newell for bringing the case. Foust's attorney, Gordon Ellis, said the law shouldn't apply to Foust because a fetus is not a child.

Thus a brave new world has come to fruition, and a baby is not a baby, just a post partum fetus.

So the next time you see some chacko macing a baby, a crack head boyfriend bashing in a baby's head, just remember, they are not people, they are just post partum fetuses.

4,922 views 51 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
The American Civil Liberties Union has criticized Fremont County Attorney Ed Newell for bringing the case. Foust's attorney, Gordon Ellis, said the law shouldn't apply to Foust because a fetus is not a child.

What's the opposite of a Saint?
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top

What's the opposite of a Saint?

Just a sinner.

WindowBlinds - Free yourself of the default settings, customize your desktop.
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
Dr. Guy,

I still expect the ACLU to take up Scott Peterson's appeal on the grounds that he wasn't a MULTIPLE murderer, the reason he was eligible for death penalty consideration, because Conner Peterson wasn't a PERSON.

Just watch. Once the hoopla dies down, it will likely happen
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top

Just watch. Once the hoopla dies down, it will likely happen

Given their latest lunacy, I would not bet against it.

Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
just more DEVALUATION of humanity... soon we will be so numb to everything. I for one am loking forward to seeing "public exacutions" on the telly. maybe a game show where the contestants guess how many seconds someone getting electrcuted can stop from shitting on themselves.
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top

just more DEVALUATION of humanity... soon we will be so numb to everything. I for one am loking forward to seeing "public exacutions" on the telly. maybe a game show where the contestants guess how many seconds someone getting electrcuted can stop from shitting on themselves.

Well, they kind of made a movie like that already - running man.

Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
The ACLU et al oppose anything could possibly smack of any sort of morality as this would automatically mean that some people are immoral which is an idea totally in opposition to their agenda.
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top

The ACLU et al oppose anything could possibly smack of any sort of morality as this would automatically mean that some people are immoral which is an idea totally in opposition to their agenda.

Now that they have broken the birth barrier, where does it stop?  it is sad that we have come to the point that we cannot have morality for fear of offending or branding someone immoral.

Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
I want to reply to this but I just can't put it into words how messed up this whole thing is. My God, how did we get to this point that anyone could even consider this.
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
#9 by Nebraskawoman
Friday, May 06, 2005




I want to reply to this but I just can't put it into words how messed up this whole thing is. My God, how did we get to this point that anyone could even consider this.



Well, it is just human life we're talking about here. It's not like it's anything really important or anything.
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
6 by Dr. Guy
Friday, May 06, 2005


just more DEVALUATION of humanity... soon we will be so numb to everything. I for one am loking forward to seeing "public exacutions" on the telly. maybe a game show where the contestants guess how many seconds someone getting electrcuted can stop from shitting on themselves.

Well, they kind of made a movie like that already - running man.


not a movie... live T.V. with real executions. with close-ups, surround sound so as not to miss a single scream.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
"Now that they have broken the birth barrier, where does it stop? "


It won't stop with the fetus. They terminate newborns regularly in China. I used to be proud of my country, but lately I realize that we aren't purposefully different, we just haven't caught up with the sickness of the rest of the world yet.
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
Actually, I believe I was just reading something the other day that China had halted the population control thing. Wish I could recall where I read that story. If I find it I'll post a link in another article.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
" Actually, I believe I was just reading something the other day that China had halted the population control thing. Wish I could recall where I read that story. If I find it I'll post a link in another article."


Ah, yeah, and they don't torture people, and re-education camps are just little get-aways to get your head straight. Do you really think that the nation who rubber-hoses people to death for their religious beliefs is gonna admit to murdering infants?
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
Actually their population control hasn't exactly been a state secret. I never said it was a fact, nor that I believed it was a certainty. I merely mentioned I had read someplace that they had purportedly halted their population control. Get a grip.
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
That whole idea makes me sick.
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
" Actually their population control hasn't exactly been a state secret. I never said it was a fact, nor that I believed it was a certainty. I merely mentioned I had read someplace that they had purportedly halted their population control. Get a grip."


...mmmkay. You believe Chinese propaganda and I'll get a grip. It isn't government mandate, it is a cultural practice, and has been for thousands of years. Even if they did stop FORCING people to do it, I hardly think they'd frown at it when people opt to.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
I want to reply to this but I just can't put it into words how messed up this whole thing is. My God, how did we get to this point that anyone could even consider this.


It starts when we devalue life. When PBAs are a women's right to chose, and the inability of a woman to feed herself means there is no quality of life left. The rest is just a natural progression unfortunately.
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
Well, it is just human life we're talking about here. It's not like it's anything really important or anything.


Unfortunately, that is the end result of the culture of death we have become.
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
not a movie... live T.V. with real executions. with close-ups, surround sound so as not to miss a single scream.


That will come in time. We have seen the beginning.
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
It won't stop with the fetus. They terminate newborns regularly in China. I used to be proud of my country, but lately I realize that we aren't purposefully different, we just haven't caught up with the sickness of the rest of the world yet.


It seems the ACLU and liberals are pushing us to catch up very quickly.
Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
Actually, I believe I was just reading something the other day that China had halted the population control thing. Wish I could recall where I read that story. If I find it I'll post a link in another article.


if you can find it, please write an article on it. It might restore some hope for mankind.
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top
Ah, yeah, and they don't torture people, and re-education camps are just little get-aways to get your head straight. Do you really think that the nation who rubber-hoses people to death for their religious beliefs is gonna admit to murdering infants?


Does the US?
Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
That whole idea makes me sick.


I as well. But I predicted it when NOW, PP and the Liberals fought PBA so hard. I knew then it was only a matter of time. Sometimes, there is no satisfaction in being right.
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top
...mmmkay. You believe Chinese propaganda and I'll get a grip. It isn't government mandate, it is a cultural practice, and has been for thousands of years. Even if they did stop FORCING people to do it, I hardly think they'd frown at it when people opt to.


I agree. Once you start down the slippery slope, it is easy to justify murdering unwanted children, post partum. China is ahead of us in that respect, but then most socialist countries are. We are playing catch up only because we are not totally socialist yet.