greywar greywar

Fake Bloggers Abusing the Terms Of Service.

▼

Fake Bloggers Abusing the Terms Of Service.

IMHO

from JoeUser Forums

    

      There has been a recent spate of fake blogging by piesnpies, anti-stalk, and fiksated. These are all the same person blogging under different names. While it is pretty apparent that they are mentally deranged simply from their article "content" they are also indulging in a bit of decption by occasionally pretending to be different people as demonstrated here. Proof that they are the same person? Here, here, and here. Hell if it weren't for the articles UK slant I would have thought they were all products of Tracy Givens deluded brain!

     My point? Well I don't mind people blogging here under different names (hey give all the schizoid personalities free reign I say!) but I think that the attempt to drum up interest in lame articles by pretending to be other people who are supporting your position is disingenous at best and retarded at worst. Certainly deserves a bit of time-out in my opinion and perhaps even a small entry into the TOS? Maybe just a large trolling?

     What do you think of this sort of JU abuse?

Site Meter
blogging
12,906 views 75 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top
"well according to Alexa JU "hell" seems to have a lot more traffic than your site SPM. I am guessing that is why you feel the need to come here. No audience for you over on your place:)"

You know nothing you stupid boy, quite frankly the recent update to sirpetermaxwell.com has signalled an explosion in the amount of visitors it receives. You cannot deny that this site is full of perverts, and the reason I have commented here is because I am morally outraged at the heresy I see here.

Get back to work peasant, don't you have a bloody job?!
Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top
To top it all off, you having Jewish retard Moanopeace to write incomprehensible nonsense about me, and exert himself on women by pretending to be their "Grandpa".


I was feeling so left out until now...I wasn't given any honourable mention.
Hell is too good a place for that bastard and his cronies!
Object Desktop - Get all of our enhancement utilities in one suite
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top
Sir Peter Maxwell, Your funny But I have to wonder why you would insult yourself by spending such time here with us peasants...
Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top
"Hell is too good a place for that bastard and his cronies!"

I should pity you really, you are so misguided that you don't see the hypocrisy of your criticism of me. Meanwhile, the Klan agitator makes brash statements about the majority of British Muslims being terrorists, and blacks being criminals and drug fiends etc. and receives a hearty cheer from the Jewish fiend Moanopeace!

"Sir Peter Maxwell, Your funny But I have to wonder why you would insult yourself by spending such time here with us peasants..."

I was hoping a young chap would ask this kind of question. Good show. I am like a Christian crusader, on a Maxwellian journey to convert the peasant infidels. If you plan to end heresy, you have to get amongst it. I will not stop until the entire world knows the name of Sir Peter Maxwell and follows the Maxwellian doctrine. All should bow to the glory of England & St George, and follow us few good men into paradise. God has willed it through his great chain of being.
Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top

quite frankly the recent update to sirpetermaxwell.com has signalled an explosion in the amount of visitors it receives.

ah yes, that would be why you have an Alexa rank of 377,000th (approx) and JU is in the 17,000? Maybe you meant "pop" or "ejaculation" of visitors as oppsed to "explosion".

Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top
"ah yes, that would be why you have an Alexa rank of 377,000th (approx) and JU is in the 17,000? Maybe you meant "pop" or "ejaculation" of visitors as oppsed to "explosion"."

I do not recognise those figures, they are false, I will happily provide figures to disprove what this site says. Peasants will say anything to discredit greatness.
Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top
Yes and I am sure that you and david have drawn a lot of people to your site with your eloquent and thoughtful responses. Comment all you like on this trolling topic but be assured that if you troll any other threads I will simply delete you:)
Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top

Hmmmm....I must be dull.  Neither St. Hubbins or Snackwell have trashed me yet.  Even Mano got a slap from them! 

Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top
Quote what figures you will, the fact remains that this site runs at a loss and Brad Wardell is a terrible businessman for letting leeches suck on his weak entrepreneurial abilities. He should take a masterclass from the great corporate raider Sir Peter Maxwell.

Quite frankly, from the comments I receive about the site it is far more entertaining than scores of blogs about American housewives taking their children to school, baking cakes etc.
Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top
"Yes and I am sure that you and david have drawn a lot of people to your site with your eloquent and thoughtful responses."

The forums are in fact seperate from www.sirpetermaxwell.com, perhaps you should actually read the site before you judge it!
Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top

The forums are in fact seperate from www.sirpetermaxwell.com, perhaps you should actually read the site before you judge it!

I was talking about Davey's and your own responses on this very thread. Thanks for helping me prove a point!

Reply #37 from JoeUser Forums Top
We are not recruiting here, why would we care about the opinions of a bunch of degenerate, insolvent peasants?
Reply #38 from JoeUser Forums Top

We are not recruiting here, why would we care about the opinions of a bunch of degenerate, insolvent peasants?

umm to prop up an otherwise deserted site of your own after being summarily tossed out from here? Yep, that would be it.

Reply #39 from JoeUser Forums Top
You are a fool if you believe that to be the case, but then again you fit the bill dear boy.

You are American, poor, a peasant and a JoeUser. All of the ingredients of an idiot. You are not wealthy enough to speak with me. Why do peasants think their opinions matter to a man such as myself?! You are worthless to me, having to swarm around a new money peasant like Brad Wardell for a sense of belonging.
Reply #40 from JoeUser Forums Top

You are not wealthy enough to speak with me.

Funny you are the one who has come a begging for attention here on my page, not me to yours... hmmm....

Reply #41 from JoeUser Forums Top
Even Mano got a slap from them!


They hate me ..... but that's OK. All my life the forces of evil hated me... I'd start to worry if things were different.
Reply #42 from JoeUser Forums Top

They hate me

Right on, take it as a good thing:)

Reply #44 from JoeUser Forums Top
quit posting the address to your lame little site on my blogs and i might believe you.


That would make you a Satanist if you start believing it...
Reply #45 from JoeUser Forums Top
Merry Christmas Grey
Reply #46 from JoeUser Forums Top
The only way that the self-mutilating whore can attack me is by lying. Why would anyone listen to the views of a drug-taking, psychopathic demagogue like you? Your words are as deformed as your husband's hand!

Moanopeace- if you believe that Maxwellian philosophy is evil then you are more retarded than I thought. Why not direct some of this self-gratifying selective anger at Little Whip? She belonged to an organisation that would happily see the destruction of your people. She only left the organisation after she was cut a deal to snitch on other criminals, like the rat whore that she is.

Anyone who thinks that the great Sir Peter Maxwell is evil should take a look at the world today, and then take a look at www.sirpetermaxwell.com and then evaluate where the real evil is.
Reply #47 from JoeUser Forums Top

Merry Christmas Grey

An incongruous Merry Christmas to you too powder:)

Reply #48 from JoeUser Forums Top
Anyone who thinks that the great Sir Peter Maxwell is evil should take a look at the world today, and then take a look at www.sirpetermaxwell.com and then evaluate where the real evil is


I did you evil turd...I even read comments that you attribute to me on there...like I would lower myself to that level. All I can say to you is DROP DEAD... the world would be a better place without you!
Reply #49 from JoeUser Forums Top
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! I got nothing constructive to add, but that fits right in here...
Reply #50 from JoeUser Forums Top
occasionally these guys resurface. i do not really know who they are except that some sort of, er, discussion, erupted on my blog--a tangential discussion, as well.

let me say that i have no personal investment in taking sides, except that several accusations were made from one side toward the other. one, er, "unbanned" user, shall we say, was accused of all sorts of things that i take seriously. this user came forth without hesitation, without posing or posturing. i'm still willing to say that this user's articles fly in the face of most things i hold dear, but for the most part they seem to be unequivocal comments and opinions, and the user seems, for the most part, to rationally argue with pinko liberals like myself.

on the other hand, while i honestly laugh (in a positive way) throughout the knighted brothers' comments, i still have no grasp on any central, driving theme to their arguments. i'm not such a tender bleeding heart that i cannot enjoy lines like

Anyhoo, fuck you and your circle jerk of suicidal drama queens, illiterate fascists, amoral nihilists, and rabid warmongers.

Yours in the celebration of the Christ child,
David Fuckin' St. Hubbins


or

Don't bother responding with another non-response or more permutations of fuck/jack/ass/stick/smack/tard, just delete this and claim it was a personal attack or spam, like you usually do.


i realize this stuff is personal to some folks, and i havent been involved in any direct disagreements with these weird blokes, but this is good for several long chuckles. do you guys disagree?

but when it gets down to cases, every one of their arguments seems to contradict the next. wetting onesself while suggesting someone is a racist bigot and then demonstrating bigotry toward women, jews, liberals, fascists, communists, homosexuals (who did i forget) doesn't leave much ground space for a soapbox.

while this logical error isn't reserved for the anonymous knights on joeuser, ad homonym is still a logical error. attacking a man rather than an argument proves nothing, nor does it clarify any rational stance. i'm sure the joeuser masses have received an overdose of whatever preaching these two devoted themselves to, but i havent reached supersaturation levels yet. im still curious to know what the hell they stand for. . .if, of course, they stand for anything besides bigotry.

(thanks for the space, grey)

TBT