Is it me or are most Winamp3 skins...

It seems that most, if not all, of the Winamp3 skins are either good or very good in quality and design. Has anybody noticed that?
1,779 views 5 replies
Reply #1 Top
Well, I think that has to do with the complexity of skinning WA3. The photoskinners and casual "toss one together in a day or so" skinners don't seem to have the skikls / patience / aptitude to skin all that WA3 offers. There's like 5 million images and 63 pages of XML...

/me notes he hasn't skinned Winamp 3 for the above reasons.
Reply #2 Top
skikls = skills... Who put those keys so close together?
Reply #3 Top
yes I noticed the amount of XML there is in it. but it doesn't have to be image heavy. I think afi-cola amp is a good example of a few bitmas and png's. the code is still rediculous though...

I guess you have a point there Dangeruss
Reply #4 Top
Frankly, I just looked and theer are 10 Winamp 3 skins in our library. I'd say it's about 50/50: 4 skins are very good, about 2 are OK, and about 4 are sub-standard, IMO. There is even one I would qualify of "photo skin".
Reply #5 Top
i did make a winamp 3 skin, how ever it isn't as good as most, there isn't a cinema and a equalisor in it, but that's just cause i didn't had the knowledge for it