WindowBlinds 3.3: Twice as vast as msstyles
from 
WinCustomize Forums
WinCustomize Forums
Anyone out there willing to do some benchmarking of WindowBlinds 3.3 vs. Windows XP's msstyles?
On the net, you'll still see people say "WindowBlinds is slow, I use msstyles instead..."
Well, our benchmarking is showing WindowBlinds 3.3 as literally twice as fast as visual styles. But what would be nice is for someone to do some independent benchmarking.
If we can consistently show WindowBlinds to be faster than msstyles, that will mean that users are actually better off using WindowBlinds to have the Windows XP look than using Windows alone from a performance/resource point of view which would be a major win.
The only non-Stardock benchmarking program I'm aware of is skinbench. Anyone have any other programs they think would be useful for benchmarking GUI performance?
On the net, you'll still see people say "WindowBlinds is slow, I use msstyles instead..."
Well, our benchmarking is showing WindowBlinds 3.3 as literally twice as fast as visual styles. But what would be nice is for someone to do some independent benchmarking.
If we can consistently show WindowBlinds to be faster than msstyles, that will mean that users are actually better off using WindowBlinds to have the Windows XP look than using Windows alone from a performance/resource point of view which would be a major win.
The only non-Stardock benchmarking program I'm aware of is skinbench. Anyone have any other programs they think would be useful for benchmarking GUI performance?
