Another Dead American - Effects Of The War In Iraq

A Rising Tolerance

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=532653
from JoeUser Forums
This is the result of the bogus war on terror. Bogus because it's being waged in Iraq. Every single person who has died and will die because of it is a life wasted, for no reason other than the theft of a precious resource. WMD. Bullshit. The blood of every dead American is on the hands of the indifferent war-dodging leader who sent them there over lies lies lies and more lies. This poor dork will likely die and for what? Because. That's a better answer than the usual horseshit. He died for democracy. Fuck you. He died because of his job dealing with Apache helicopters. Fuck you. He died doing something he believed in. Fuck you. Nice try. Know why the shmuck's going to likely die? Because he's American and people hate Americans. That's it! Nothing else. He wasn't a political fool. He was a nobody to all but his family. Ha. I bet this guy holding up the baby for sympathy probably supported the whole mess to begin with. He probably had nothing but disdain for Arabs and the 'sand niggers' over there. He likely had nothing but contempt for Iraq and he probably cheered when the US tore down Hussein's statue. And this is the end result. Another dead American. Another US casualty in the bogus war on terror. 'Iraq has WMD...imminent threat.....drones spraying WMD....we know where they are....these sattelite photos clearly show.....'. Lies. All lies. Another fucking dead American. And why the hell hasn't this clown even seen this grandson in 3 years? Because he gives a shit?
4,076 views 11 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
Why not take your anger out on the pathetic and barbaic ISLAMIC cowards? Anymore, I am beginning to truely question the nature is islam. Are the coward terrorists truely extremists or they the only brave ones to act for what islam truely stands? Out of an entire nation of Islamic people in Saudia Arabia there was but 1, just 1 that said the man should be freed. Oh, and that was because he was thinking of converting to islam.

Here in the USA, there were prayer vigils for the man. Where were the reglious clerics over in Saudia Arabia? They certainly were not holding prayers for the man or even condemning the threat of killing him. No, they support the beheading of the infidel. What is shocking is that some people think we should run from these people and then it would end. History has shown that a evil left alone is not a good thing.

If the rest of islam supports (even by inaction) this behaviour then I think we should slag the entire region. To hell with islam.

And another thing, this had nothing to do with Iraq so I fail to see the connection......
Just my reaction to the event of the day.
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
sgsmitty64:
The terrorists who captured Johnson are a small group within the society in which they live. They are "have nots" with little or nothing to lose and everything to gain in the sense of what they think they want to do which is drive all Americans and westerners out of their country. Now, remember a few things about the world. First, when the terrorists are our people we call them "patriots and freedom fighters." But the British called them the rag-tag successionist rebels in the 13 colonies. Also, when it comes to religious fervor, the Crusades were about as nutsy an attempt at radical change in the name of religion as you will find.

The bottom line is that Paul Johnson knew the risks of doing what he was doing and was paid well for it. It is never a happy event when anyone is used as a pawn but there will be more as long as both sides act as they are now.
Sins of a Solar Empire: Rebellion
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
CrispE:
Our people did not shear the heads off of British civilians. The methods are much different.
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
well if the fucking morons weren't killing civilians by the bushel in Iraq the US would have more friends in the region. Is this guy saying the Saudi kidnapping would still have happened if the US didn't illegally invade Iraq? Dream on.
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
"The blood of every dead American is on the hands of the indifferent war-dodging leader who sent them there over lies lies lies and more lies."
And the lies keep piling up. This leader needs to be impeached, not considered for actual re-election.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
"well if the fucking morons weren't killing civilians by the bushel in Iraq the US would have more friends in the region. "


Americans were hated in the region long before even the first Iraq war. Terrorists are civilians, in case you hadn't considered it. Osama bin Laden is a civilian.

Al Qaeda beheaded the last guy in Saudi Arabia, not Iraq. The last person beheaded in Iraq wasn't killed by an Iraqi, it was another Al Qaeda affiliate. Was 9/11 a pre-emptive attack because they knew we were gonna invade Iraq? When you take into consideration the fact that Al Qaeda has been targeting Americans for more than 10 years and in other administrations, your Iraq theory kind of washes out.

You are the kind of person they are counting on when you blame beheadings and other atrocities on the US policy. It is their sincere hope that beheading people will effect political change in the West. I'm sure if the terrorists in question read your post they would laugh at your ignorance and then applaud themselves for deluding the simple. Vote Bush out, elect some simpleton that will give them exactly what they want, and you've validated the act of beheading as a means of political change.

Over and above, you call the victims of this schmucks, dorks, and accuse them of racism. Your post is ignorant, insensitive and sickening, not unlike what I would expect from the terrorists themselves.

What does it say about you as a person that you can say that Americans should expect to be beheaded if their government makes people mad. That is what you are saying. The inevitable result of toppling Saddam Hussein is... beheadings. I feel sorry for anyone that can blame a third party for a beheading.

Your post is sickening, politicizing what would in any other part of the world a psychopathic murder and insulting the people who are murdered. For you, though, beheading seems to be an inevitable political statement. Let's just start applying "That's what you get" to every crime...

Fuck YOU. You should be ashamed.

Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
The Korean gentleman has been beheaded according to Al Jazeera.

You are a disgusting human being, mikimouse, for giving credence to terrorist's excuses, and for blaming anyone other than the guy that weilds the knife. In your other blog you called this poor guy "Mr. Poontang", on this one you insult the victims. I put you on the same level with all the trash that supports these acts.



Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
They've been screaming for Jihad for years. I'm glad us "infidels" are there giving them one, whatever the reason. Mr. Johnson was murdered by a bunch of chickenshits not "executed". Pure and simple. I don't care how long it's been since he's seen his grandkid, what's that got to do with anything except make you feel better about his murder.
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
he probably cheered when the US tore down Hussein's statue.


As were the Iraqis that watched it tumble. Cheering the downfall of Saddam Hussein is a bad thing in your eyes? You are obviously a person of very low intelligence.
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
Give mikimouse a break, he is just responding like a coward, must be french in his blood