Edger45 Edger45

the planets

the planets


do differnet planets do things better than other planets. Like does a desert planet produce more credits than ice planets and ice planets produce more crystal or what? and are asteriods not as good as planets? or are they the same.

also i dont totally understnad why there has to be gas giants that arent colonizable and stuff. Like whats the point of having them?

sorry if these questions have been asked already but please answer them thx.

75,785 views 52 replies
Reply #26 Top
isnt there a vasari tech that increases fleet points? like at lvl 9 or 12. that would fit too.
Reply #27 Top
Read'em and weep Schoddy.
Reply #28 Top
:SURPRISED:
Reply #29 Top
Not when you didn't say it in this thread
End of quote

oh yes I did.
"while that probably means its more connected to logistics points, its not definite in any way."
aha ron, you


LOSE!


you really need to learn to read ron, its rather funny that you never see my blatantly obvious disclaimers.
Read'em and weep Schoddy.
End of quote

?
the only thing I see here is more support for my theory, it raises the cap. but is it the only thing that raises the cap? it definately didnt say so.
Reply #30 Top


you really need to learn to read ron, its rather funny that you never see my blatantly obvious disclaimers.
End of quote


When you imply your quoting, but your instead paraphrasing, its annoying. You didn't say: your in all likelyhood right -- you said something else. Ergo a search didn't turn it up, ergo I assumed you said it in another thread.
Reply #31 Top
ergo you need to read what I say more often.
Reply #32 Top

ergo you need to read what I say more often.
End of quote


Actually, I read everything you have to say. I just can't keep straight what BS your spouting where very often.

Oh, and btw:

while that probably means its more connected to logistics points, its not definite in any way.
End of quote


you just cant accept when I said "your in all likelyhood right". if thats not good enough for you then stop lecturing me about being arrogant, because you havent shown much tendancy to the opposite.
End of quote


Those two are not logically equivalent, at all.
Reply #33 Top
oh now you're just being a sore loser. at least admit that you're too quick to ride me rather than trying to prove that "likely" and "probably" dont mean the same thing.
Actually, I read everything you have to say. I just can't keep straight what BS your spouting where very often
End of quote

hey, Schod inc. is not responsible for any or all failed workings of your brain. if you cant understand simple english that would be your problem.
Reply #34 Top
oh now you're just being a sore loser. at least admit that you're too quick to ride me rather than trying to prove that "likely" and "probably" dont mean the same thing.
End of quote


Actually, likely and probably are close enough I wouldn't bother. However:

You are likely right [about it being based on research]
while that probably means its more connected to logistics

is not even close to being logically equivalent. Yes, logistics (if your referring to the civilian building "cap" for planets) ties into research (and vice versa) but the two aren't even close to equivalent!
Reply #35 Top
yes they are

Ron, you just cant win this! give up, I swear I've never seen you so stubborn on something you're obviously wrong about.
Reply #37 Top
how can you possibly not see that I was telling you that you were right! you guys have got to be kidding me.

here I was thinking your IQs were only about the level of an intelligent ass, apparently not.
Reply #38 Top

Stop fighting or I'll raise both your bounties.  :( 

Reply #39 Top
hell, last I remembered I wasnt sparking any fights, I was telling everyone how smart they were.
Reply #40 Top
Stop fighting or I'll raise both your bounties.
End of quote


*brings forth TEC UBER FLEET OF DEATH* (now based on research) :p 
Reply #41 Top

Stop fighting or I'll raise both your bounties.


*brings forth TEC UBER FLEET OF DEATH* (now based on research)  
End of quote


*siege raids avatar*. a grave mistake uber FoD is, learn to deploy your forces, you must.
Reply #42 Top
I wish each race had their own Home planet. That would make certain planets more valuable for certain races, and add more strategy to team games.
Reply #43 Top

*siege raids avatar*. a grave mistake uber FoD is, learn to deploy your forces, you must.
End of quote

*splits, baits and ambushes Avatar's fleet, crushing him solidly*

yup... not only that :P
Reply #44 Top
Oh blah, its based on research.
All of us old timers will just have to deal.

Now get off my lawn you kids!!
Reply #45 Top
I wish each race had their own Home planet.
End of quote
  Actually, this used to be the case, but it became confusing and unbalancing depending on the map.
Reply #46 Top

I wish each race had their own Home planet.
  Actually, this used to be the case, but it became confusing and unbalancing depending on the map.
End of quote


sad...
Reply #47 Top
Do people have each planet focused on one thing or do you balance each one. Like do you build all research buildings on one planet and on the other put a lot of trade ports or do you put one of each building on every planet?
Reply #48 Top
you can choose what to put at each planet, and are only limited by the orbital logistics slots.
Reply #49 Top
Ik but i was asking what people usually do or like to do
Reply #50 Top
well there is a benefit to having trade stations spread out, and in a continuous chain. research doesn't matter as much. sorry I read your question wrong (:(