From the JU TOU:

(a) upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, pornographic, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;

D'oh!

what do you think my complaint on this thread has been about.





this is very vulgar to me.


i didn't threaten anyone. i made a statement about what i would do if someone tried to make me do something that i find objectionable.

When you threaten someone with bodily harm (butcher knife?) you have crossed waaaaay over the line. I reported your comment and I hope others will too.

hear on out


this should read here on out. so don't tell me you don't misspell words.

call it what you want. i call it defending myself from a bad person.

there i turned myself in. i told you i cannot be black mailed.

Ok, in that case I call it retardation with a touch of psycho thrown in for good measure.

FYI: here v. hear is not a spelling issue. They're homonyms.

no psycho with depresion


here is a place

hear is what you do weth your ears

i didn't want to tell gid that he had used the wrong word. so i told him he had misspelled it.

sorry this should read hear is what you do with your ears. i was trying to type and eat at the sametime with a cat on my lap.

sorry i was not trying to say that gid was a bad person. but someone who would try to force me to do that to him.

Bullshit, daniel. You have the worst persecution complex of anyone I've ever seen. I've been beyond civil to you lately.

But apparently you're some kind of masochist. I'm beginning to believe Lucas has a kid brother and you're it!

No, Daniel. "From here on out" is the proper phrase. Believe me on this one. It is NOT "from hear on out" as you insist.

God, you're a riot. I honestly didn't believe anyone so pathetically stupid could turn on a computer, much less use one.

oh, the second one. Didn't catch that one, LW.

He's right of course that it was misused. But I was pissed when I put it together. It was late, I was tired. Still, as TW said it was not technically a spelling error and at least it was flipping READABLE!

But I digress. I never claimed perfection, it's just that when my seven year old has a better sense of grammar and substance than you do, Danielost, it's quite frightening.

You're lying when you said I continually attacked you. I had resigned myself to let you stay in your corner while I stay in mine. But you have to be a piece of shit and call me out in the body of your article as one who has attacked you mercilessly, so I might as well start living up to the reputation you've carved out for me, shouldn't I?

You want to claim that I've stifled your free speech, daniel. SHOW ME WHERE! Not only have I not broken the law (stifling your free speech would actually involve hacking your JU account and deleting/editing your articles), but you seem to think that free speech begins and ends with you. You may have the right to say the most stupid, ignorant things ever uttered by a biological adult, but I have a right to call you a submoronic oaf with the intellectual capacity of a one celled organism. Free speech, as I mentioned earlier, swings both ways.

i am not the one who wrote hear on out you idiot. you wrote it. i corrected it to here on out for you. i have to deal with someone everyday who thinks he can do no wrong.

no i am trying to use small posts and words so that you and gid can understand me.


obviously gid cannot even understand what words he used and which ones i used.

i don't really care what your 7 year old has. of course we can't all be perfect like gid who cannot write or spell when he is half a sleep. there is no reason for bad spelling. of course this rule is comming from mister perfect who doesn't ever misspell.

since i only used your name in this post once before you got mad. please tell me where on here do i say

Your fucking article was WRITTEN as an attack on me, you paleolithic moron! Yes, there were other targets, but you called me out BY NAME!

poor little daniel was making a flap
while eating & typing with the cat in his lap
he claims that's the reason he can't spell for crap
trying to eat with that cat on his lap
turns each type he tries to type into a tap
if he ain't wearing pants is it a felony rap
typing and eating with a cat in his lap?

so now you will tell me you have never attacked me.

could it be he, lucas and jessedewannabeanglo are melded through some sorta inexplicable moronic convergance to form a wholly cretinity?

Nope, I'll never claim that. But to claim, as you did, that I make a pattern of it, is to lie outright.

You know WELL where the conflict began, daniel, when you were provably and demonstrably wrong, yet continued on in your delusion despite my attempts to correct the error. It's your pattern, and you do it constantly.

You probably could approach some level of cohesiveness if you simply listened to CRITICISM rather than labelling it all as an attack. There's a HUGE difference between criticism and an attack, and if you can't tell the difference, I feel sorry for you.

Years ago, when everyone began bragging about their online test scores, I took one specifically with the intent of blowing it. I succeeded, and the result basically said "you must be toying with us because someone with the IQ registered by your test scores would not be able to access the Internet and operate a computer". You have proved thm wrong, daniel.

I think you're onto something, kingbee!

I'd tell you to watch your back, but any mafia stupid enough to have them as leaders poses no real threat to you. Instead, I'll tell random strangers to watch their backs.