Moderateman Moderateman

They EAT their own, Democrats that is!

They EAT their own, Democrats that is!

Democratic Congressman Brian Baird, Slashed and Trashed

 Democratic Congressman Brian Baird, an ardent opponent of the Iraq war, who recently traveled to Iraq and, surprisingly, came back saying that the "surge" is improving things there. This man has angered the Moveon crowd, as they have now taken out attack ads aiming at getting him out of office for the crime of thinking for himself! MoveOn doesn't aim to engage in debate, but to punish and silence Democrats who dare think for themselves. This has become typical of the farleft loons TO EAT THEIR OWN PEOPLE that do not follow lockstep the mantra, Bush bad, Iraq failure. Any Democrat that dares to think for themselves will be harassed and defamed by the Moveon people, these folk have no morals, no scruples and no ethics, their only desire in life is to turn America into some kind of European Model of Secular progressive Blather {GAG} Religion Bad! I do notice they believe in spreading the wealth of the nation helping those that cannot help themselves, as long as it's not their money!

The funding behind MoveOn comes from radical left-wing billionaires George Soros and Peter Lewis, from the Richard and Rhoda Goldman Fund which has assets of nearly $400 million, and from the ultra-liberal "Tides Foundation." MoveOn members also donate. In other words they have deep pockets and do not mind spending millions on the destruction of any member of the democratic party they see as betraying the CAUSE!

There is nothing on the right that compares with the tactics used by MoveOn and the reach it has purchased. These people have co-opted fanatical left mainstream media people at the New York Times and NBC News, among others, and can get their propaganda spread quickly. The far-right has little, if any, access to the mainstream media.

When good men like Senator Lieberman and Congressman Baird become targets of hate and defamation—and their own party doesn't stick up for them—you know something is very wrong. We all saw how quickly the left turned on Joe Lieberman in the Connecticut Primaries, the smear job done on him, the racist and bigoted anti-Semitic remarks spread by the moveon crowd trying to defeat Senator Lieberman and defeat him they did, in the primaries.. but in the general election Joe turned the tables on the moveon crowd and had a sweeping victory despite the millions of dollars poured into defeating him.

5,849 views 34 replies
Reply #26 Top

Pretty much defines how democrats operate. It is not the evidence that matters (or lack thereof), but the seriousness of the charges

I think an article written by McCain's campaign manager who had personal experience dealing with this situation does hold up to scrutiny.  I also saw an interview of McCain's wife who described the pain that it caused her daughter.  Of course, there is not going to be an official statement of dirty tricks in elections, that doesn't mean it didn't happen.  This was just one example that came to me off the top of my head of Republicans eating their own.  I am sure there are just as many incidences on the Republican side as their are on the Democrat side.

Reply #27 Top

Of course, there is not going to be an official statement of dirty tricks in elections, that doesn't mean it didn't happen.

That is how slurs are created.  "of Course no one is going to admit it".  And therefore the believers do not have to offer any proof.  Just the belief is enough since "of course they are going to deny it".

By the same token, we all KNOW that Richard Jewell did it.  And "of course he will never admit it".  But the lack of proof is just proof of how well they cover their tracks.  It has nothing to do with facts.  The absence of facts is further proof that it must have occurred.

And of course step 2 in the democrat playbook - accuse your opponents of your crimes before they can uncover yours to deflect the criticism and the attention. "I am sure they do it as well, everyone does it".

Reply #28 Top
I think an article written by McCain's campaign manager who had personal experience dealing with this situation does hold up to scrutiny.


And then you wonder why I compare you to Col gene, Loca. You guys take anything said bad about someone opposing your opinions as fact or truth just because it came from someone who was close to that person. It's kinda funny how everyone admits that lying is part of being a politician except when you are saying something bad about the opposing party, then it's all true, it must be true, right?
Reply #29 Top

And of course step 2 in the democrat playbook - accuse your opponents of your crimes before they can uncover yours

and how many Republican scandals have there been this year alone?  Methinks they do protest too much. 

It's kinda funny how everyone admits that lying is part of being a politician except when you are saying something bad about the opposing party, then it's all true, it must be true, right?

This is about a Republican candidate using dirty tricks on another Republican candidate, Charles. 

Reply #30 Top

and how many Republican scandals have there been this year alone? Methinks they do protest too much.

So that makes everyone true, regardless of the evidence?  Guess we should add a 2a to the play book.  Ifit has happened somewhere at sometime in the history of mankind, then it must have happened now as well.

p.s. For the record, no one is protesting.  Unless asking for facts is a protest.  Which to a democrat probably is.

Reply #31 Top

Reply By: LocamamaPosted: Sunday, September 09, 2007
this 'ARTICLE' ha! is an opinion editorial better known as an op-ed piece, no where did he back up a single allegation with a fact, no where did he claim to even know someone that got one of these phone calls. In other words his article has LESS VERACITY THAN MY simple article has where at least I have real facts to back my premise up.

Like I said no one stands up and takes credit for a whisper campaign. No one holds a press conference or puts out a press release. It still happened. Whispers of Karl Rove being responsible.

My whisper machine must be broken, I have not heard any whispers of McCain Having a Black Daughter or Rove being responsible, but then again why would I for in those days I voted Democrat and voted for Gore in 2000 Who was robbed I tell ya, robbed!

Reply #32 Top

 

Reply By: Dr GuyPosted: Monday, September 10, 2007
this 'ARTICLE' ha! is an opinion editorial better known as an op-ed piece, no where did he back up a single allegation with a fact, no where did he claim to even know someone that got one of these phone calls. In other words his article has LESS VERACITY THAN MY simple article has where at least I have real facts to back my premise up.

Pretty much defines how democrats operate. It is not the evidence that matters (or lack thereof), but the seriousness of the charges. Loca, you just did what you accuse republicans of doing. No names, and a slur with no basis in fact.

And yet she cannot see this.

maybe I will write an OP Ed piece detailing my intimate knowledge of how Hillary's campaign told the democrats of Obama's cross dressing antics. Of course I cant mention any names or sources since it was told to me on the condition of anonymity. But I am sure you have heard of it, right? Everyone has.

 

Were you told about this out loud, or was it a whisper?

Reply #33 Top

voted for Gore in 2000 Who was robbed I tell ya, robbed!

Chuck Robbed?

Reply #34 Top

Reply By: Dr GuyPosted: Monday, September 10, 2007
and how many Republican scandals have there been this year alone? Methinks they do protest too much.

So that makes everyone true, regardless of the evidence? Guess we should add a 2a to the play book. Ifit has happened somewhere at sometime in the history of mankind, then it must have happened now as well.
p.s. For the record, no one is protesting. Unless asking for facts is a protest. Which to a democrat probably is.

This is one I truly love and both sides engage in this, when one side is busted doing something bad, enethical, or immoral, instead of owning up to it, they immediatly point out "well your side does it too" as if that excuses bad behavior.