Apparently, the NY Times now feels that Post Partum Abortion is a cause Celebre that must be defended at all costs (including the truth).  Back in April, one of their "unbiased" writers, Jack Hitt reported on a case of a women being given a long prison sentence for having an 18 week abortion.  And he advocated that she should not be in jail for killing her baby.

The problem is, that the woman, Carmen Climaco, did not have an abortion.  She murdered her new born baby after birth.  An autopsy showed the baby died of asphyxiation after birth, not before birth, and it was a regular term birth, not a preemie.

And what does the NY Times have to say about all that? They stand by their story.  In other words, they stand by a lie, just to promote post Partum abortions.

And we are supposed to believe their lies when it seems that almost every day their reporting is shown to be false, misleading or just down right slanderous?  Right!  No problem on my part.  I don't read the rag any more.