Michelle Malkin heads to Iraq, Leftists Hope She Dies

Another example of the tolerant left.

Yeah but what are the radical left saying?

The best comparison I saw was made by an historian who compared the current left to the SS troops of the early 30s.

I dont see any difference.

First of all. learn to SPELL. People judge you two ways. First, by the way you look, l then by the way you speak (write). They can overlook your lack of beauty, but if you speak as an idiot, that is the way that they will think of you. As an idiot that cannot speak properly. Nuff said.

There are times that I bristle at the poor grammar and spelling on blogs. Each time I respond to someone whose grammar or spelling is not correct I have to restrain myself. I have to remember that when I am responding to someone that sometimes passion takes hold and I allow the rules of grammar to slide out the window. It could be the same with the person I disagree with. In nitpicking as our friend has done he is hoisted on his own petard as well as destroying his own credibility while nullifying any future posts because everyone that takes issue with him will first look at his spelling and grammar as reason to ignore the point no matter how valid it may be. My point is deal with the points and let the posters mother worry about the spelling and grammar, unless the person is your employee in which case find a new employee.

There are times that I bristle at the poor grammar and spelling on blogs.

I will readily cop to that as well, but as long as they have generally formatted their posts I don't mind too much. If it is just one long block text with no paragraphs or indents, punctuation, and every other word is misspelled and their first language is english I might off some constructive criticism for a bit but otherwise it just let it go.

I just love it when someone mangles their own grammar, spelling, and punctuation while in the process of criticising anothers' grammar, spelling, or punctuation.

Yes, Gary the coward deserved it I have no truck with you dear lady.

by the by criticizing and another’s' sorry I could not resist. LOL

pippels dat puke funn atz utter pipples spelink uzualley half nuffin two ad two thee converpsation.

pippels dat puke funn atz utter pipples spelink uzualley half nuffin two ad two thee converpsation.

This is my point exactly! Thank you for saying it in such a concise and unique way.   

Now hear this: Michelle Malkin does not answer mails from crappy little bloggers like me. Probably because I do not spew enough vitriol (like her).

Now hear this: Michelle Malkin does not answer mails from crappy little bloggers like me. Probably because I do not spew enough vitriol (like her).

What vitriol do you speak of? I am curious.

Now hear this: Michelle Malkin does not answer mails from crappy little bloggers like me. Probably because I do not spew enough vitriol (like her).

Now hear this : She gets more email in a day than we get in our lifetimes. Get real and grow up. Have a trolling.

(Citizen)Paladin77January 4, 2007 23:25:27

pippels dat puke funn atz utter pipples spelink uzualley half nuffin two ad two thee converpsation. This is my point exactly! Thank you for saying it in such a concise and unique way.

you are most welcome, anytime I see people throw away the content of an article because of an error in spelling I see red and usually give them a nice trollhouse cookie.

anytime I see people throw away the content of an article

The wierder part of this is that I think he didn't even care about my spelling or grammar but rather that of a commenter.

To Paladin77:
Read her site. If it isn't vitriol (def: highly caustic criticism), what is it?
To Greywar:
Sure she does. If she's going to spew racist comments about atrocities I'd like to know why and I don't give a tinker's toenail whether she gets a million mails or not. If you don't service your high-faluting blog why are you blogging? OOps, it can't be serviced due to World-wide adoration: Jeez, who wants to adore a bloglady who is so wrapped up in her self-serving opinions?

OOps, it can't be serviced due to World-wide adoration:

how did she become adored world-wide if she doesn't "service her blog"?

If you don't service your high-faluting blog why are you blogging?

hmmm responding to emails is an integral part of blogging? Holy shit! I guess I have never "serviced" my blog then?

If she's going to spew racist comments about atrocities

Got a quote?

End analysis, you hate her, and since she didn't answer your emails, she isn't a blogger for some reason. We all know that every blogger with thousands of emails is somehow obligated to answer them all right?

To Paladin77: Read her site. If it isn't vitriol (def: highly caustic criticism), what is it?

Never having been to her blog before today I picked one at random here is what I read: I love how the always oh-so-sensitive New York Times has no problem throwing my ethnicity into an attack, when my ethnicity has nothing at all to do with the subject (the jihad vs. anti-jihad war at YouTube). Of course, if you visited NYTimes writer Virginia Heffernan's insipid blog to look at the petty swipes, you wouldn't know about it. She or her editors edited the gratuitious ethnic references out after readers complained and failed to note that they had done so. But thanks to Bob Cox, you can check out the evolution of the hilarious edits for yourselves:

Where is the bitterness, hate, caustic criticism? I gather from this that she was attacked for being either half breed, or some other offence rather than the content of her words. I have seen worse said about me on JU, I have said worse things to peoeple here on JU. This is why I asked what you were talking about. If you had something specific in mind it would have been easier for me to understand your point of view. Now that I have done the research myself it looks as if you just hate the woman because the NYT hates the woman. I could be wrong but that is how it looks today.

As far as answering your E-mail, maybe 200 people before you said the same thing and it was not worth commenting by the time she reached yours. I am new to blogging so I don't know the rules, is it required to answer each and every letter sent when you have a national blog that receives thousands of letters an hour?

QV: Greywar's post on this.