RONALD REAGAN, JESUS CHRIST AND FIDEL CASTRO
Here's What They All Have In Common
from 
JoeUser Forums
JoeUser Forums
Ronald Reagan is constantly belittled by Hollywood. Jesus Christ is constantly the target of those with an anti-biblical bias. And Fidel Castro is whitewashed. The liberal media and entertainment industry commonly portray all three with great dishonesty and an overwhelming lack of truth.
RONALD REAGAN
A couple of months ago, CBS cancelled the movie THE REAGANS. It was totally dishonest and also character assassination. What was publicized to be an accurate biography of former U.S. President Ronald Reagan and his wife turned out to be largely demeaning and slanderous fiction.
Enemies of Reagan have always tried to portray him as a shallow-minded dolt. But he had an in-depth grasp of countless complex issues and was quite articulate and persuasive in explaining them. Everyone who knew him testify that he wrote most of his addresses himself from his own knowledge.
The liberal scum at CBS did not even have the decency to wait for Ronald Reagan's death to try to rewrite his history. Suffering from Alzheimer's disease, he lies bedridden and is unable to defend himself. His grieving wife must feel immense pain at the smearing of their reputations.
The biggest problem with THE REAGANS is that much of the film is absolutely untrue. Mrs. Reagan, family, friends and colleagues say there is no evidence for many of the statements, attitudes and actions portrayed in the film--and that they are completely contradictory to the character and record of his life. What justification could there be for such revisionist history?
JESUS CHRIST
Some believe a fiction that Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalene, a devout follower during His earthly ministry, and fathered a child by her. Not only is there no evidence of such events, there are also clear biblical proofs against them. To entertain such a preposterous notion is a denial of the clear facts of history.
The idea of this accusation was launched by a novel, THE DA VINCI CODE. The novel's speculation about Jesus Christ is pure fiction. But what is much more disgusting is that ABC News devoted an hour-long TV program to this subject. Isn't news supposed to be non-fiction?
As with ABC's SEARCH FOR JESUS a few years ago, the network seems determined to tell lies, deceits and wild speculations about Jesus Christ. Why is it that insulting biblical Christianity is in, but any realistic critique of Islam or other religions is out as politically incorrect?
Look at all the malicious attacks on Mel Gibson's film THE PASSION. It is too real for comfort for the Hollywood liberals who only want to distort the truth.
Liberal journalists and other elitists are willing to sacrifice professionalism and credibility just to brainwash the masses into adopting their politically correct way of thinking.
FIDEL CASTRO
Do the liberals portray every famous person in a negative light? Not at all. An example of the opposite extreme is reporting on Fidel Castro, a hero of the Hollywood elite. Castro is referred to as the leader or president of Cuba rather than the brutal, murderess Communist dictator he is.
The many Cuban exiles in the U.S. are bewildered at the sympathetic and flattering treatment shown to that oppressive regime. When CNN president Ted Turner and CBS news anchor Dan Rather interviewed Castro they treated him as if they were talking to an American President.
Ronald Reagan, Jesus Christ and Fidel Castro are only three examples of subjects that are commonly misrepresented by the liberal media and entertainment industries. Many more could be cited. Much of the reporting and portrayals are not only inaccurate, they show of pattern of bias and personal agendas designed to influence your thinking. American's cannot remain a free people unless they learn to think for themselves.
RONALD REAGAN
A couple of months ago, CBS cancelled the movie THE REAGANS. It was totally dishonest and also character assassination. What was publicized to be an accurate biography of former U.S. President Ronald Reagan and his wife turned out to be largely demeaning and slanderous fiction.
Enemies of Reagan have always tried to portray him as a shallow-minded dolt. But he had an in-depth grasp of countless complex issues and was quite articulate and persuasive in explaining them. Everyone who knew him testify that he wrote most of his addresses himself from his own knowledge.
The liberal scum at CBS did not even have the decency to wait for Ronald Reagan's death to try to rewrite his history. Suffering from Alzheimer's disease, he lies bedridden and is unable to defend himself. His grieving wife must feel immense pain at the smearing of their reputations.
The biggest problem with THE REAGANS is that much of the film is absolutely untrue. Mrs. Reagan, family, friends and colleagues say there is no evidence for many of the statements, attitudes and actions portrayed in the film--and that they are completely contradictory to the character and record of his life. What justification could there be for such revisionist history?
JESUS CHRIST
Some believe a fiction that Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalene, a devout follower during His earthly ministry, and fathered a child by her. Not only is there no evidence of such events, there are also clear biblical proofs against them. To entertain such a preposterous notion is a denial of the clear facts of history.
The idea of this accusation was launched by a novel, THE DA VINCI CODE. The novel's speculation about Jesus Christ is pure fiction. But what is much more disgusting is that ABC News devoted an hour-long TV program to this subject. Isn't news supposed to be non-fiction?
As with ABC's SEARCH FOR JESUS a few years ago, the network seems determined to tell lies, deceits and wild speculations about Jesus Christ. Why is it that insulting biblical Christianity is in, but any realistic critique of Islam or other religions is out as politically incorrect?
Look at all the malicious attacks on Mel Gibson's film THE PASSION. It is too real for comfort for the Hollywood liberals who only want to distort the truth.
Liberal journalists and other elitists are willing to sacrifice professionalism and credibility just to brainwash the masses into adopting their politically correct way of thinking.
FIDEL CASTRO
Do the liberals portray every famous person in a negative light? Not at all. An example of the opposite extreme is reporting on Fidel Castro, a hero of the Hollywood elite. Castro is referred to as the leader or president of Cuba rather than the brutal, murderess Communist dictator he is.
The many Cuban exiles in the U.S. are bewildered at the sympathetic and flattering treatment shown to that oppressive regime. When CNN president Ted Turner and CBS news anchor Dan Rather interviewed Castro they treated him as if they were talking to an American President.
Ronald Reagan, Jesus Christ and Fidel Castro are only three examples of subjects that are commonly misrepresented by the liberal media and entertainment industries. Many more could be cited. Much of the reporting and portrayals are not only inaccurate, they show of pattern of bias and personal agendas designed to influence your thinking. American's cannot remain a free people unless they learn to think for themselves.