Screensavers here should be the same as the skins.
Free. Not a trial. No nags. Not something downloaded from somewhere else.
You want to include a link or message about others you have to sell? fine, that's what the 'settings' button is for.
You knew my ex?
the forum appears to not be updating - main page and 'recent' page shows 2 replies, yet there were 4
Its good to know that I'm not the only one. I agree with your comment.
Reppiks
You knew Bichur ex?
Thanks for all your Replys
I have no problem with purchasing things I want, but it'd be nice to have this confusion sorted....items for sale clearly marked as such, and distinguishable from regular library items.
| Reppiks You knew Bichur ex? |
Obviously didn't know my ex....would still be in a straight jacket and padded cell otherwise.
Got out not long ago meself....and the tranquilizing meds, well they're a life-time thing if I don't wanna go back.
| and the tranquilizing meds, well they're a life-time thing if I don't wanna go back. |
and these are what cause you to drive on the wrong side of the road???
we're seperating the screensavers into two different galleries, seperating the OD gallery into icons and docks, maybe the entire gallery system just needs a good toss (as in salad, don't mean throw it away). Maybe we could colour code them (Is that the correct spelling of color, Starkers?)
The shareware [nag] screensavers are posted by their owners so in that regard there is no issue.
They 'may' be crippled or limited in some way but arguably so too is the Windowblinds trial version [and there's no apparent 'issue' with that]...
Ideally any shareware screensaver [with nag] should indicate that it is such in the description but other than that I can't see any valid reason not to include them. They tend to be of a 'better' standard than many of the freely distributed ones. Consumers can make up their own minds whether they're so much better that they warrant nag-removal through purchase - or simply continue to use them as distributed...
| The shareware [nag] screensavers are posted by their owners so in that regard there is no issue. |
ah.
If it needs to be, then it needs to be..
| Ideally any shareware screensaver [with nag] should indicate that it is such in the description |
worth repeating
| Ideally any shareware screensaver [with nag] should indicate that it is such in the description |
Worth repeating over and over, Or is there away to add that in if they forget to put it in there description before putting in library.
Thanks for your response Jafo
Not trying to be a pest. Just tired of installing screensavers just to uninstall them 2 seconds later because of nags.
| and these are what cause you to drive on the wrong side of the road??? |
I don't drive on either side of the road anymore....disability issues make me an unsafe motorist so I stay off the roads these days unless a passenger. However, were I still a motorist, I'd be driving on the correct side of the road....as in, we instinctively say left or right, not the other way around.
| Maybe we could colour code them (Is that the correct spelling of color, Starkers?) |
Yep, the first was...lose your dictionary prior to the second?
Funny thing about language...when I lived in England and spoke with the broadest of Devonshire accents (saying things like "bain't be gwen" instead of "not going"), I had a London tourist ask me for directions, then promply ask: "Don't you know the Queens English?" when I responded.
To that I retorted: "Well I 'opes 'er effin' well is, me dad's paying enough bleedin' tax to 'elp keep 'er up there livin' in luxury."
The extra vowel argument (neighbour, colour) is one of our favorites.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting and posting on the forums.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!