Oh No! Vista Clones have reach WinCustomize!
WWW Link
..btw, i understand that a "Mod" it is nothing but a real rip!
TYCUS ...the issue ALWAYS with OS Ports is that one will [hopefully] always look like another.
It's the nature of the beast.
Determining whose is a 'copy' of what is next to meaningless as ALL are 'copies' of the ORIGINAL....one way or another....
The_Muggar ...since the OWNER of the actual copyright to 'Kol's work' requested he [Kol] remove any and all public access to that skin you are unwittingly/unlawfully providing means of distribution [via links] to that which you have no right/s.
Wincustomize.com will continue to abide by Microsoft's request/s until such time as this situation changes to the contrary...
but Vista looking SS are each day more and more...
A pity for originality...
| It's funny but it seems that the only word "Vista" in the title makes downloads becoming mad |
| Hey The_Muggar, the avatar/personal icon you are using was not posted in another thread by me for you to use. |
| Hey The_Muggar, the avatar/personal icon you are using was not posted in another thread by me for you to use. |
, i told u guys! the depression of the rippers has begun!
| the double standard by allowing this skin to exist is laughable. obviously there is a reason microsoft requested Kol's work to come down...one would think that the same set of circumstances exist here. just because microsoft hasn't said anything about this item, doesn't make it right. allowing it to exist is setting a piss-poor example for everyone else. here we go folks, lets make it okay to steal...ummm...i mean "port" everyone's work |
It has always been acceptable to 'port' an OS to an alternate 'skin', whether it be to Windowblinds, or Winamp, whatever.
This has been the case a long time before Vista, XP, OR Whistler for that matter.
They [ports] are regarded as fair-game until such time as the Owner of the OS determines to the contrary.
THAT has happened exactly TWICE in skinning's history. The first was at skinz.org regarding a Windowblind which provided the 'look' of OSX over half a decade ago, and the second was this year, initially ONLY here [inequitably] and was specifically Kol's skin [port] of Microsoft's Vista.
Since then there has been no communication/concern in any form in reference to any OTHER Vista 'version'. This silence is therefore taken as acceptance of their public distribution [in much the same way as that 'modded' [hacked] dll circumventing digital signing of styles is met with silence/indifference].
If and when Wincustomize.com is contacted [by Microsoft] with requests for the removal of these new 'ports', AND these requests are universally applied/communicated to all the public skinning sites without favour they will be promptly complied with....
| just name it Vista and everyone wants it |
| Popularity Whoring 101 |
Remember Misery's 'TrendWhore' wallpaper?.....
....a classic...
AND... it doesn't even have to have much in common with Vista. or.. give it an Aero name and not have a single Aero detail in it. Popularity Whoring 101 |
| Popularity Whoring 101 |
| the double standard by allowing this skin to exist is laughable. obviously there is a reason microsoft requested Kol's work to come down...one would think that the same set of circumstances exist here. just because microsoft hasn't said anything about this item, doesn't make it right. allowing it to exist is setting a piss-poor example for everyone else. here we go folks, lets make it okay to steal...ummm...i mean "port" everyone's work |
I totally agree. I thought here at Wincustomize the moral issue behind,ripping, copying,'porting' was paramount. Seek the permission of the owner before you 'port'! The message here to skinners here has been made clear on many ocassions in the past...'stealing is stealing'...black and white!!!
If Microsoft requested Kols theme to be pulled, then it WAS for a reason and you should be able to have the initiative enough to practice what you preach. Stand by the black and white claims u have made in the past and recognise that morally it is stealing and promoting the facilitation of stealing anothers work.
| Since then there has been no communication/concern in any form in reference to any OTHER Vista 'version'. This silence is therefore taken as acceptance of their public distribution [in much the same way as that 'modded' [hacked] dll circumventing digital signing of styles is met with silence/indifference]. |
Do you expect Microsoft to daily scan each graphic website to look for infringements on what they have quite obviously made as a moral point and then request everytime that it be removed?
If you want to create a 'grey' area regarding theft to suit your needs;in a black and white policy you so solemnly advocate, then in my opinion, you are no less the same than any other ripper or theif that looks for these exact same loopholes to justify their actions.
Its easy, as you have said before, to justify these actions by saying 'silence is therefore acceptance' and 'I will stop when everyone else is asked to stop'. Such arguments have been used by rippers,plagiarists,hackers and P2P communities for as long as i can remember.
I am only taking and reflecting the hard-line approach you have so vehemently promoted in the past and wish to point out that if you choose to create self-serving 'grey' areas in such a black and white policy you advocate to others, then your credibility on this issue is seriously undermined.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.