Ye I almost bought that I-inc when it was on sale for $250! Didnt have the money at the time, and after it went up in price I had my doubts about how long it will survive. Got a 27 inch LG instead and works great, when i bought it it was $380. LG works great and is also worth looking at; I-inc and hanns-g 28 models (they are basically the same) have a bit more real estate though
lol just realized there is a big (i mean BIG) fail in my logic on the tourney. if you have a group of 4, thats 3 variations of 3 player teams, but they will not be able to play each other (duh that means 3vs3 as in 6 players in a group.. stupid iokke). solution = bigger groups or intra group matching. For example 2v2s are played within same group, 3v3s are 3 games matched vs another group. similarly based on timeslots. in any case my thinks you need a point system with as ma
stuck in the mud? you seem like a nice guy and an amazing player from all the posts here, but you need to stop letting the urge for recognition get to your head;) Doing the tier 1 for each dg will prolly be a huge pain pacs
Yeah gl man, but still hoping youll fit in games here and there;).. tho you prolly should just focus on school
Well in that case ty for all your input, sucks that you had to take on all the weight. I still dont like how that statement was made for reasons expressed above But given the input stardock volunteered for community owes you ty, again (and GPG owes you that too). Btw why did stardock have to pay for GPG's shortcomings and necessary fixes?! does not seem right. Also cow is right, when you have different groups of people you will always have someone that is unhappy
2nd the expansion pac but it runs into the same problem, with a small player base doing either will not be profitable for the company.
Demigod Forums
you are giving this more weight than it deserves, of all people you have the most content to discover. Out of now 10 dgs i extensively played only 3;). You'll be fine so long as you get past the noob stage where you get kicked from games that are above your paygrade. Since you are reading the forums already im sure you'll know which games to start at and will progress faster using the strategy section, gl buddy
hard to keep up with 500+ posts:) pacov did you ever get to read the expanded post on the tourney system? wanna know what ya think, its kinda long tho=/
my impression is that DLC was the only way to get new content as its necessary to cover the costs, and as such it wasnt milking but a necessity. Otherwise im with niz here=P
Demigod Forums
IMHO, as was said in another thread, trolls were just used as an excuse. the game is still fun to play so congrats on the purchase
[quote who="Spooky__" reply="24" id="2507281"]Even with a statement formed like that, the "it's pretty clear" would indicate that the decision was made because of the hostile comments. And don't forget the second statement.[/quote] or indicate that they want public it think so. Its always about money (nothing wrong with that, they run a business). Responses convinced them that there would be no profit. If they thought they'd make money despite negative responses by s
[quote]with the consequence being that there will be no additional demigods or maps added since it is pretty clear that the amount of hostility would overcome any value of the additional content.[/quote] Ok so read as follows: with the consequence being that there will be no additional demigods or maps added since its pretty clear that not enough players will buy DLC to cover the value (cost) of additional content. That i understand, smaller than expected playerbase i un
Ok that makes more sense now, my friend who got me to buy this game mislead me.. still a bad way to back out of DLC
This seems rediculous to me, though there is a good chance im missing something so sorry if I'm way off with this reply. When I bought the game I was under the impression new content will be coming for free, for quite some time... Isn't this game under a year old? Than you were gonna charge players for it, now you're saying since some of you are not happy we wont do anything, not even as DLC. 2 more dgs is all you get. Sounds like a teenage excuse
lol so my addition made list too long for you katana?;) Ke5 added a replay though it may not be a very good example because we just ate that team since Kestrel was hacking;) if I get a game going with good teammates on both sides ill post it. Not emotionally attached to being on the list so if it is getting long or you are not sure, you can take me off pacov, wont be offended. btw think imma change my name to decent:D
[quote]was he nominated and I just missed it? I don't recollect playing with him personally. [/quote] maaaybe;) epi threw my name out there earlier, but dont think I ever played with you. Thx epi ke5 life Esuzu & pacs for the add Think Ninki would a be good candidate for t1 aswell
failboat! noone will ever let you play with them anymore jk, shit happens, sure theyll understand
:D well not sexy or dirty but did make me laugh so it works
7pm ET means Eastern Time in USA/Canada, you can figure out your local time by using windows clock or websites. ET is −5 hrs GMT or UTC−5 during standard time. Its the New York City timezone. I want to say that eastern time is the time displayed on this website when it dates replies, but not sure if thats just for me (im central though so doubt that)
btw Omicron way to thank zombie for nominating you though i did that few posts prior to even you nominating yourself. Now im expecting a nice sexy & dirty thank you comment from you since he got 1;) yeah i am very bored at work;P
[quote]I accept balancing in concept, but honestly I prefer to just host my own games with 50%+ plus players. Those end up being the most interesting aside from a nice pre vs pre match. I'm not sure why people have this fear of good players. I enjoy playing good players, as long as I know there's not a horribly weak link on my team to exploit.[/quote] funny exactly the same applies here, almost added same thing to 1 of my posts. havent played with own pre tho;) Its no
Actually this is a good idea, prolly best way to get a high level game is to create a lobby announcing it so that people can wait a bit prior to it instead of coming in and leaving. That way you get more good players coming in at once vs. having mixed results. gl with it!
you do not want groups based based on same skill level. That hurts high skilled players and helps weaker ones. if anything you'd want to spread those percieved to be tier 1 out. Do a poll but more detailed one explaining the time you need to put in. also dont forget to add to the pole topic name "3v3 no nubs no pre"... but you know someone who is playing their third online game will still join and vote;) jk.. but they really will Still think its bette
How many players will want to participate in it seriously? if around 50 people we can pull it off fairly easily . But by seriously i mean if they say I will play from 3-7pm central american they will play from 3-7pm. A variation would be making groups based on people's playing timeslots. Think group A group B etc in soccer. Can make small groups or large groups, small groups will be easier to deal with. Ex: groups of 4 => 3 team variation
:) I never said that its good for the best player from my experience you can not carry a total nub vs a decent team no matter how good you are so 20 80 vs 50 50 is not by any means balanced. now 40 80 vs 50 50 is better than 40 50 vs 80 50, given that 40 knows what he is doing he will learn, 50s can learn from 80, and 80 can write it off on the tax return or learn cause he has to pull for 40 a bit.