[quote who="MichaelG04" reply="38" id="2550072"]i have a feeling there will be fences pro and object dock 2 integration there i said it[/quote] A fence is really nothing other than a multiline dock. This is why I feel fences should have been added as a new feature in objectdock rather than being a separate app.
[quote who="irek1988" reply="26" id="2540886"]So... 60ms lag. That is not even 1/100 of second. I bet pro like you can cast 5 pots and 3 fireballs in Wow or other Pro game . [/quote] I'm strictly talking about first person shooters here. WOW is not a FPS. Imagine this scenario. You have a fairly small target moving across the screen, it takes 1 second for it to cross it. If every frame shows you where the target was 8ms ago, you have a very much higher probability of clicking
[quote who="irek1988" reply="24" id="2540855"] Lol at 100+ fps when you eye can only catch 26-30 fps. [/quote] Playing any online first person shooter at 30 FPS will give you a significant disadvantage against a player who plays at 120FPS. Doesn't matter if you can actually see the difference or not. At 30fps it takes 33.4ms to render a screen, during that time a lot of things happen regarding to position of the enemies. Let's say you have a 100ms ping response to the server
[quote who="Jafo" reply="19" id="2540449"] That 106fps average had a minimum around 70fps so there was/is sufficient headroom to make staggering 'unlikely'. [/quote] Grab any game that runs above 60FPS at all times, play it with vsync on and off. If you can actually SEE the difference, you'll probably note that vsync off seems more jerky (screen tearing), even if it's a higher framerate. With a refreshrate of 60Hz on the monitors you still have
Ewww, stock cooling. I hope it's better than the last dozen or so generations... I prefer things that doesn't soulnd like a smaller jet. :) [quote who="TobiWahn_Kenobi" reply="9" id="2539925"]Oh god, it is another "how many fps can you see" thread... As for you, ok, so YOU can only see lets say 50 fps. Me, I can tell the difference between 50 and 80-100 fps, not in the middle of my sight but at the edges where the discrepancy between the changin
[quote who="OldMsgt" reply="141" id="2538788"] In the case of Stardock you are paying to test the product, I know it also includes the purchase of the produt. The question is after the testing I do not want the product would Stardock refund the money, I think not. That is the difference, no matter how you spin it.[/quote] So what? You have the choice of not paying and not try the beta too. That's fact, no matter how you spin it. It doesn't prevent you from waiting unti
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="47" id="2538765"]Mick...ya gotta lay off that Surstromming. It ain't gonna change...so relax, my friend. [/quote] Not that I'm gonna be prevented from relaxing by this, but no change is cause for more concern than the other way around. ;)
[quote who="c242" reply="72" id="2538753"]If it really works as good as the screenshots looks, this will be the best 1st timer skin we ever had here on WC IMHO.[/quote] First blind and first time skinner is not necessarily the same thing though. I seriously doubt this is a first ever skinning attempt, if it is, I'm in awe. :)
Some people vote based on how well the skin applies, other on if they like the design, someone else on the composition of each individual element and some even rate based on if they know the person who made the skin. There are also other factors, like how many votes has been cast, and how votes are weighed (if at all). DEtermining quality or sorting by votes will never be useful, regardless of how the voting system is implemented (unless the only thing you want to achieve is removing the abso
[quote who="2of3" reply="81" id="2537888"] to be honest I don't often see it as most of the time whatever I am doing is full screen. I just change the desktop because I can. From the amount of desktop shots that Rick has shown, I can't imagine that he keeps a setup for more than a minute at a time anyway. Do you ever slow down and actually enjoy a skin before changing to the next setup?[/quote] He probably saves the screenshots and occasionally enjoys browsing through those.
[quote who="Kyanar" reply="28" id="2533816"]And ObjectDock Plus works fine for me on Windows 7 Ultimate x64. Where is all this coming from?[/quote] There are hundreds of posts describing the issues. Just because things seem all fine to you doesn't mean the software is without problems. If it works for you, then good for you. Posting comments like this doesn't help anyone, it serves only to anger people who (rightly or wrongly) feel they have unacceptable issues.
Here's a screenshot of my laptop. Keeping it simple as I don't do much more than browse the net and watch an occasional movie on it.
[quote who="JukEboXAuDiO" reply="26" id="2533913"] P.S. Never introducing ideas to this community again. Only because they are either wildly unpopular or noone cares.[/quote] Wildly unpopular? Where? And please don't call me "noone", it kind of makes me feel belittled. :)
[quote who="inc0gnito" reply="134" id="2534499"] Now there's a turnaround: you pay to get into the beta with a perk of getting the official release when it's all done and dusted. [/quote] It's pretty much the same as every online game release since World of Warcraft... *shrug*
[quote who="PoSmedley" reply="22" id="2530809"] and as such I'd have to say that simply using the company name will not automatically imply affiliation. But are any called 'Microsofters' or 'Sonyians' ? [/quote] No, they're actually simply "Microsoft" or "Sony", which technically would imply affiliation in even greater extent. I'll just drop the issue, it's perfectly clear that it's not what I feared it was. Though "Stardockians"? "Stardock fans" sound a l
WinCustomize Forums
[quote who="JcRabbit" reply="189" id="2530782"]Am I to understand from this that Stardock is now renegading on its initial promise to fully support 3rd party galleries on Wincustomize (old timers will know what I am talking about)? That promise is the only thing that made skinners fully embrace Wincustomize after the demise of Skinz.org.[/quote] That was already said during the subscription drive last year.
[quote who="Jafo" reply="18" id="2530769"] Please don't try to confuse the issue.....particularly with examples such as Ferrari. Even 'Ferrari Owners' Club' is accepted as 'Ferrari' is a descriptor of the group's car of choice....whereas 'Stardockians' will ONLY technically refer to those people employed by Stardock.[/quote] Ok, even if I do accept that Stardock isn't a product, and it's different from Ferrari that way. It's more like Sony, Nokia or Microsoft, who also have
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="16" id="2530753"] C'mon, Mick... that wasn't the point at all. [/quote] Ok, that bit is probably a mile or two over the top... I uh... well.. Guess I'll hang my head in shame for 3 seconds... My point still stands though, arguing over a group named 'stardockers' is ridiculous. It also makes me want to do stupid things like creating hundreds of groups everywhere called various stardockish things (Good thing I have self-control :P ).</
WinCustomize Forums
[quote who="JcRabbit" reply="186" id="2530741"]My apologies, but where is the Winstep gallery?[/quote] I believe they made a "no-3rdpartysoftware"-policy (seems like Microsoft isn't considered 3rdparty) when they didn't get enough cash out of the visitors.
[quote who="Bebi Bulma" reply="106" id="2530577"]Or better question, why marry her in the first place if you feel that way? Sheesh.[/quote] Why would ugly mean she's a bad person to be married to?
I doubt you'd lost a legal battle over the use of that name on a group on a random website. As long as you're not trying to make money off the brand it's extremely unlikely that there would be any legal action from anywhere. There are groups on pretty much every social site with groups named Audilovers, Lady Gaga's girlfriends, Microsofthaters, Applelovers, bananacakeleague or whatever... [quote]Using the name 'Stardock' implies official approval/association with the c
WB and OD is Meridian by essorant (as we all should know ;) ), colorized and texturized. Wallpaper is Stand Alone by Szabizs . Think it turned out quite nice, no? :)
Well, here's my opinion: Buying a new router today is annoying. Either you get lacking hardware or unstable firmware. So I suggest that you find a router with gigabit ports and 802.11b/g/a/n wireless support. When you find a few of them, check which of them support dd-wrt and if there's more than one, buy the one with the USB port (if you can afford it). :) But if I had felt I had the money to put up for a DIR-685 I'd buy i
I'm hoping you've already implemented the colorization and texture support a'la WB7 in the next generation OD+? :) Here's something that would be super to add to it: Automatic OD+ themeswitch along with WB. OD+ could (optionally obviously) automatically switch to a theme with the same name, and use the same texturing/colorization, as the applied blind. Ideally I would like to be able to choose a background style, and it will autopick the appropriate one determined by kind of dock (if a
Top 10 gadgets that defined the AMERICAN decade though... :) Tivo, Motorola and palmone has little to no leverage in europe.
Stardock Forums