[quote who="Leauki" reply="9" id="2187735"]Protestants don't have priests. You should have talked with her too. I don't believe the rest of the story either. [/quote] Oh, I did. Though her work was seldomly a topic when we talked. Since priest is the english translation for the german word "Priester" and/or "Pfarrer" she WAS or IS for that matter a "priest". Period. And I don't give a flying fart about whether you believe the story or not. Some memb
Star Adder
Then be happy that you didn't develop any deeper feelings for her. A girl with such a limited mindset is a waste of time and effort. On the other hand, when I was much younger, I had a sadly short relationship with a female protestant priest. She didn't care about me being an atheist at all, and never tried to baptise me. When we started to get intimate I said:"Wait a sec, don't people like you just have sex for procreation?" And she asked me in which century I'd be living.
Very good. Thanks for the heads up. What Derek said about Starforce might be true concerning new versions. The one used on i.e. Etherlords2 however is really just a basic disk check afaik. Anyways, I'm really glad about these announcements and therefore will buy DA:O and ME2. The rest of my posts was just a halfhearted attempt at humorous conspiracy theory. [e digicons]:grin:[/e]
[quote]BioWare games deserve to be played, not boycotted![/quote] Agreed! They explicitly stated it won't be any version of SecuSuck. But they didn't mention Starforce... [e digicons] _>[/e] [e digicons];P[/e] [e digicons]:grin:[/e]
Well, Chris' post on the DA board stated that the CD/DVD won't contain no other form of copy protection/DRM than disc check. I'm wondering though how things turn out when it comes to updates/patches/downloadable content ...
Folks, lula is beyond reasoning. Why waste your time on pointless arguments?
[quote]Its silly because most DRM has long since ceased to be anything that fits the technical definition of "malware". DRM has a horrible reputation that WAS well deserved. Nowadays things have changed somewhat.[/quote] *ROFLMAO* Yeah, that's why so m any people wrote in different forums that SecuSuck killed their DVD drives, would crash the game if you have certain software running and all that. Wake up to reality. And on-topic: If that proves to be correct DA
Right you are. [e digicons]:fuzzy:[/e] [e digicons]:cylon:[/e] [e digicons]:grin:[/e] No, seriously. I like to keep an open mind to new possibilities like i.e. interdimensional bridges and such. Though I'm afraid I won't witness the usage of those in my lifetime. [e digicons]:([/e]
*get's a bowl of popcorn*
Could be that FTL travelling isn't possible. But who says it is nescessary at all? Could easily be that space folding or inter-/extradimensional travelling is the key to explore the universe(s) and meet other lifeforms...
[quote] There is no life outside of planet Earth but you can keep on dreaming. When it comes to life, Earth IS the center of the universe. Think about it![/quote] *LOL* I wonder who is the one dreaming... Funny how you keep on posting your belief as fact... @Solam: This is all nice and well. But I already stated that extraterrestial life has not to be a lifeform as we know it. Who says that lifeforms all need oxygen to bre
@Leauki: This kind of approach to "God", religion, history n stuff that you have is the way I would very much like ALL people to have. Because I could not more wholeheartedly agree to this statement: [quote]I have a problem with ... people telling me what my beliefs are, have to be, or that I have to accept their Messiah as mine. ... I can live with the fact that there are Hindus, Muslims, and Christians out there without worrying about them being "wrong".[/quote]
Leauki, the big problem with lula (and many other religious people btw.) is that she states her beliefs as fact. i.e."Jesus died at the cross." Or "Judaism is like this and that." when it should read:"I believe that ..." Granted, I don't always write i.e.:"IIRC String theory goes like this." instead of "String theory goes like this." but when someone who obviously has more knowledge of the facts, I accept that and review the facts to asses whether or not my initial statement w
Right. But since ONLY the imagination of an existing "God" exists (in the mind of those who believe in him)... Case closed.
[quote]a true revelation of God's will demands a divine guarantee of authenticity[/quote] And what would that be? A certificate from VeriSign? And would you have to install that certificate on your ? [e digicons]}:)[/e]
[quote]To your first sentence: Just because something is true one way DOES NOT MEAN the inverse has to be true (it is a logical fallacy). [/quote] The first sentence isn't mine. It's me quoting lula. So not [b]I[/b] committed this logical fallacy - lula did. And as for nitpicking concerning kill and murder: It's both technically speaking taking another person's life. And afaik the bible says that it's only up to "God" himself to take a life. And
First off: Moostetek and others who asked where the bible said that "God" didn't create any other life or such. Doesn't the bible explicitely state that "God" created man to be the epitome of creation? Well, if we were to meet aliens who are more advanced than we are I guess that assertion would be proven wrong, wouldn't it? Secondly: The problem of our search for extraterrestial life is that with our limited fantasy we can not grasp that other lifeforms could exist in
Well, let'ts hope that we meet some advanced alien race sometime soon. This would instantaniously disprove the assertion that man is the epitome of "God"'s creation. Furthermore it would disprove his own almightyness. Because if "God" created man according to his picture and to be the epitome of creation as is written, and suddenly a more advanced race shows up, which obviously would NOT have been created by him, there must be someone-/thing that created THIS race. And to do so this s
[quote]principle that the greater cannot come from the less, rather the less must always come from the greater.[/quote] OH! So e.g. a molecule doesn't form from it's atoms but instead the molecule forms the atoms? Interesting... [quote]Here is a list of some distinguished Catholic scientists.... Astronomy.... Copernicus, Galileo,...[/quote] *LOL* Who got almost cruzified by their very own catholic church for postulating a heliocentric
[quote who="lulapilgrim" reply="20" id="2163181"] ... why pick up a Qur'an or study Shinto if neither of these is the one religion that God revealed? [/quote] My goodness! This has to be THE most ignorant statement I've read so far in this thread...! Why? Because you might actually learn something. Learning leads to greater understanding. In this case of other cultures. What defines and drives them. By i.e. reading the Qur'an you might actually learn tha
[quote]DS9 was by far the best ST show. [b]It ran for 7 seasons and all of them were good.[/b][/quote] Thats just [b]your[/b] opinion. In mine the first three seasons were crap. [e digicons]:P[/e]
Indeed Seven was the best of the whole show. But my guess is that this is exactly why they brought her in. They were afraid that otherwise the show would be cancelled due to dropping rates prematurely.
As long as they ship without DDRM: 1. Dragon Age 2. Mass Effect 2 3. Dunno otherwise 1. GalCiv 2 2. Warlords 3 3. Wizardry 8 This is of course assuming that Elemental won't make it to the final release in '09.
Well, I guess if you ask 10 people about whether DS9 was good or crap you'll get 20 different opinions. I for one would say: Up until the end of the 3rd season it was the cream of the crap. Merely a soap opera in space. Later on it was still crappy enough at times, but overall it was improving a lot. With Brooks behaving more the way he was as Hawke in Spenser for hire. The last ep however was simply awful. Voyager is a completely different story though. Utter crap fro