That is double talk. It either is or is not. --I meant it as in that we have had [at times] been a major political figure internationally,i feel....might not float every bodys boat....but oh well....
---Denial, There seems to be a lot of that going around. The US is not nor ever has been an empire. We broke away from one 230 years ago and have never tread that path. Revisionist would have everyone believe that the US is an evil Imperialistic Empire, but the facts prove otherwise. --I agree it hasn't been an empire like great britain was, and i doubt it will ever, but it has, in my opinion, been an "empire", in other means....<br
Rightwinger--- Is it me or do most liberals sound like a broken record player.....must be me.... :p;p
Manipulation of Mass Media by government Executive Branch and DARPA Office of Strategic Information ---That isn't the only manipulation of media, hence the liberal bias.....think about it... ---Here in oregon we have the CIM[Certificate of Initial Mastery], where you are tested over several different areas[4th,8th, and 12th grade] and you have to pass the standardized tests in 12th grade, or you don't graduate, this has forced th
If you would like to help this Oregon based anti-pedophile website, check it out. http://perverted-justice.com/
sorry for the triple post...my comp's keyboard is sticking...
I don't believe that death is too high a cost to establish a government that believes in justice and rule of law for all individuals. --Precisely The answer (real answer not a silly insult) is it's getting harder every day to make excuses for the killing of innocent people. --what about Hussein, should we[ or any democratic country] just sit around with our[pardon my #$##] thumbs up our asses while there are countries out th
I don't believe that death is too high a cost to establish a government that believes in justice and rule of law for all individuals. --Precisely The answer (real answer not a silly insult) is it's getting harder every day to make excuses for the killing of innocent people. --what about Hussein, should we[ or any democratic country] just sit around with our[pardon my #$##] thumbs up our asses while there are countries out th
I don't believe that death is too high a cost to establish a government that believes in justice and rule of law for all individuals. --Precisely The answer (real answer not a silly insult) is it's getting harder every day to make excuses for the killing of innocent people. --what about Hussein, should we[ or any democratic country] just sit around with our[pardon my #$##] thumbs up our asses while there are countries out th
The answer (real answer not a silly insult) is it's getting harder every day to make excuses for the killing of innocent people. ---Then why excuse Hussein for killing masses of innocent iraqi's,i.e. genocide....are you against him being gone in a senseless war (i'm glad we went in their, we got rid of an evil man, and their were in a way WMD, the chemical weapons, mustard gas, ricin,etc.... found...[or something like that,forgive me if i am
A. What is the year of your birth? 1984 B. What state do you live in? Oregon C. Which presidential candidate did you vote for in each election over the course of your life? 2004-Bush D. If you've had a major shift in political beliefs, is there any particular reason for it? I used to be fairly republican like, but after getting sick and tired of the bureacreacy of both main parties [De
Also, I personally feel that iran or N.korea, shouldn't have nukes, well most nations actually...if you think about it, out in the public these "friendly" countries say that the nuclear programs are for peace, and that the nukes are for _____ [input whatever] But in private they can build these weapons, also, the weapons inspectors wouldn't find anything , these alleged "weapon producing" countries could just as easily [if they have made t
And the only nation who has used it is USA, the one who said they are the "Defender of Democracy". --Sure the US used them first, but take a good look at diplomacy and general ideaology back then and compare it to now...Back then truman used them to make peace and prevent greater casualties for the US, if we had done our alternative [ japan refused peace talks BTW] which was to invade japan, the projections of loss of lives for the americ
I second that..Moderaterman....It isn't ours to use or way...
I second that..Moderaterman....It isn't ours to use or way...
I second that..Moderaterman....It isn't ours to use or way...
couchman---nice reply, i agree with you...The U.K. [thats if Blair is still in office then] and maybe australia, japan, and s. korea...[also, i think if there is ever military against china, when it is all said and done, Tibet should be free...no questions asked, and if necessary, have a U.S. [not U.N.] security force[ i.e. military] to keep china from re-conquering Tibet....(that is a bit off the subject i know.....but still.......)
tbt I think the US might do something [depending on the president at that time] but the UN would definantly be the "do nothing" people.
I know one thing, if there is any attempt to form a one world government, i will resist bitterly. That is a promise. And if anyone doesn't like that, oh well.
PolMach Forums
For all you who were, or are anti-kerry or anti-dem. A video: http://www.kerrysucks.com/flash/voting_machine.wmv
PolMach Forums
I found this at this anti-hannity/bush siteL Link and i found this slightly interesting, from what i've researched, this [ some of the info in this article] is incorrect, that is to say out of context, "slightly"....if anyone has anything on this, or comments, reply. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Be torn all you want. Put it this way. Them being fired for smoking in their own home would be like getting fired for being gay (and keeping it to home). ---> Lets do it, lets fire 'em cause they're gay! They're fireing people for other stupid reasons, i know one thing, i would never work for that company, they just violated those peoples rights..
It is quite blatant and obvious. The G.O.P. lies, and they don't even try to deny it. Yesterday, Republicans admitted that they sent mailings claiming to voters in two states that if you vote for democrats, the Bible would soon be banned. There could be nothing further from the truth! For starters, most Democrats I know are practicing Christians. Secondly, Democrats are the strongest defenders of freedom of speech, and I could never see them d
Welcome--and thanks for clearing the history up.
And that is what you would get for thinking that. It has been said time and again that WMDs were only a PARTIAL reason for going in. ---thank you, finally some one said that. When did we become the tool to enforce U.N. resolutions? ---Our job, as the US in the UN, is being a police force to help enforce UN sanctions. [I remember reading that somewhere, i'll look for it as soon as i can.]