Capitalism doesn't see black vs. white. It sees working class vs. ruling class, bourgeoisie vs. proletariat. Black vs. white is pretty much just a cover. I can understand your anger, but I think it might be a bit misdirected. I can kinda sympathize with your situation. It took me a while to find a job, and to be honest, I probably got lucky when I got it.
and I coome back for number 16: The store closes at 9:00. Please don't come in at 8:57, do all your shopping, and leave at 9:14. I want to get the hell out of here too.
--I never said that everyone who dislike bush are morons,etc... Thos who are irrationaly anti bush. Col gene, Dabe, etc... They won't admit anything positive (as far as i have seen) about bush. According to them, he's always wrong. Does that sound rational? Or logical? Well, from reply number three in
This has been building up for a while, but today was a bit nuts, and a couple things put me over the edge to writing this. (reaches for a beer) I work as a cashier in Canadain Tire (for the 99% of you who live south of the 49th and are clueless, it's kinda like a large hardware store chain in Canada). The job ain't bad, and the co-workers are good,
Tis ok. Yea, a rant. Hope it was a good one. It was fairly decent, but I think I'm going to need an alcohol fueled rant soon (bad day at work).
Just to clear things up, I wasn't actually trying to start a challenge (perhaps I should have been more clear on that). It was more of a response to EindelWolf's challenge Link where he put forward a similar challenge (except the opposite) for anti-Bush people, then said that if we didn't come up with three positive things, three policies from his 2000 campaign, etc, all p
You just defeated your own challende. If you want to prove a theory, you do not set the end result before the test. You have already decided that only the hate Bush crowd can respond. Since you will not accept and have already put out your own bias. if you want an Honest dialog, try approaching the subject in a neutral mann
I'm having a little problem with my blog (latour999.joeuser.com). It seems like the top articles and recent articles aren't updating.
at least, it's fixed on my blog
yeah, I screwed up the title. It's fixed now
I have a challenge to those bloggers here who are pro-bush... The challenge is: Name three instances when bush responded/acted ineffectively and/or incorrectly. (In your opinion) (i.e. Katrina, Abu Ghraib, etc...) Name three policies of bush's that (during his 2000 or 2004 campaign) you disagreed with, and state why (if you do ) you d
What, we haven't made peace? Actually, never mind. I'll just claim the title of socialist instead of liberal. It doesn't have as much of a negative connotation to it, and is less associated with the US Democratic Party.
Name three instances when bush responded/acted effectively and/or correctly. (In your opinion) (i.e. 9/11, abuse charges,etc...) Name three policies of bush's that (during his 2000 campaign) you agreed with, and state why (if you do ) you disagree with them. Name three positive aspects of Bush. (Truly positive, not
Interesting sidenote, the teachers are on strike over in BC for better teaching conditions and a pay increase (the government wants to do nothing and hand down a pay freeze), despite legislation by the government to bust up the strike (they can now hold them in contempt of court and jail union leaders). Now, the education minister is telling them to scab on the strike (what was that Jack London quote again? "The scab is a traitor to his God, his moth
These are just living people, not all time, correct? I do think Chomsky, Mandela and Chavez are decent choices.
I wrote an article a while ago, where it was a somewhat paranoid fear of google watching me. You can see my house on Google Earth too...and if I knew the precise time the image was going to be photographed, I'd stand outside and wave, lol. I would wave too...with one finger. Hmmm...I w
I never use my blacklist for two reasons: First, I believe in freedom of speech (and points whoring) on my blog Second, and most importantly, I don't know how to work the damn thing
and I really don't feel like getting into a body count fight right now...
but those dead don't seem to mean much to her....they go AGAINST her agenda How about the 100000ish dead Iraqis, not just the 2000ish dead Americans? Bah, everyone picks and chooses with their dead to justify anything.
If you look at the far left, you also find such evils, and just as often. I think it is telling of your bias that you label "far-righters" as social darwinists. In reality SOME on the far-right believe such, just as some on the far left do. By far righters, I meant the waaaaaaay far righters, like nazis
A question was floated on JU not too long ago about why left wing atheists who believe in evolution don't believe in social Darwinism. First, the question is filled with assumptions and generalizations about the people in question (possibly a symptom of a well baited lefty trap). Here I will try to answer the question as best as I can. Simply put, they are t
or rich enough like Trudeau or Mulrooney... AHHHHH! Not the M-word! "He bugs us still" - Peter C. Newman
Here In California you must belong to a party to vote in primaries, otherwise I would be independent, Is it that way in Canada? We don't really have primaries, at least not the way you do. Our leaders are selected at conventions, and last until they either step down, or are challenged on the floor of t
I've been debating whether to join a political party or not for some time now. My problem is finding a political party that fits my views. I have already eliminated the Liberals, Conservatives, and the Bloc based on astounding political differences, so I'm left with the debate over whether to join the NDP or not... I have sympathized with the NDP for a whil
JoeUser Forums