Nice one Adni!! I grabbed it as soon as I looked it over.
Phoon
mine is full screen like that and I'm on version 2004. It isn't new to 20H2
[quote who="admiralWillyWilber" reply="3" id="3782327"] To my opinion you should've went with a quad core, and a I5, or a I7, and 16 or better gigabytes of ram before you worry about a SSD drive. [/quote] Not true at all. You will get far more speed from an SSD than a spinning disk!
I have a late 2013 Macbook Pro Retina that still hums along just as well as it did from day 1. Also at work I have a Late 2017 one. That one will not charge and shows the battery in good condition. Not going to spend the $$ to have it repaired either. Additionally, I came across a iMac (4K, 21.5 inch, Late 2015). It had a 1Tb 5400 rpm hard drive in it. With that drive they are TOTALLY unusable!! I put a 512 Gb SSD in it and it's a champ now!! Putting that drive in was
please add an option to ignore the wallpaper that is packaged with the styles. I prefer apps not mess with my wallpaper. Also, the start button does not function until you close the interface.
[quote who="RedneckDude" reply="14" id="3780808"] Mine does not, Al. [/quote] only systems with WDDM 2.0-compatible GPUs show this information in the Task Manager. If you don’t see it, your system’s GPU probably uses an older type of driver. You can check which version of WDDM your GPU driver is using by pressing Windows+R, typing “dxdiag” into the box, and then pressing Enter to open <a href="https://www.howtogeek.com/2584
[quote who="RedneckDude" reply="2" id="3779443"] But the Intel should say AMD [/quote] AMD... rolls off the tongue like rat poison..[e digicons]:rofl:[/e]
couldn't say.. I do know that the last time I used IP that it was a known issue at that time. Never tried it again after that as I had to wipe my system to fix the issue. Glad to hear it's ok now
[quote]On the bubble WindowBlinds (usage of desktop skinning is becoming less common and skinning has gotten more and more complicated) IconPackager (making icons today is a lot of work due to resolution and most people don't bother changing them anymore) [/quote] Windowblinds: Agree 100%. It's a dying horse and if your seeing revenue streams decline from it you have
just suggestions Sean. Logic dictates that if the requirements were at the top then less people would have problems. I don't have to deal with those problems so it is no skin of my nose.[e digicons]|-)[/e]
I'm still a bit stumped why support is telling people to post in the forums when OD clearly is supported on Win10. Also, that little bitty tiny disclaimer of system requirements at the bottom needs to be at the top of the page, bold and highlighted so that people are well informed at the start of the examination process.
[quote who="neone6" reply="43" id="3756378"] Just drop it already [/quote] Example of said Ego right there.
I don't think the question or attitude was out of line at all until he was attacked for even asking it. If someone doesn't think that the master skins are up to his/her standards of willingness to pay, that is their right as well! No reason to get butt-hurt because someone doesn't like your work. Bloated ego has caused many members to just go to the shadows and driven potential new ones away. Disgusting.
[quote who="DaveBax" reply="135" id="3742072"] So what you are saying basically is the Masters that upload quality paid skins hardly ever upload a quality free skin. [/quote] Dave... to put it bluntly... I said nothing more than what I said with no hidden meaning. Don't read between my lines and put anything other in to what I said. I'm sorry if you don't understand my thoughts behind it but please don't add words to what I said. Thanks ;)
[quote who="don5318" reply="84" id="3741737"] So, what are you implying Phoon, that us Master skinners should make free skins, and not make a few dollars, and by some miracle, if we were to make free skins (not paid), that the popularity of Windowblinds will jump back up again? [/quote] Not at all Don. The amount of high quality free new skins is an ever decreasing commodity, while new Master skins simply maintain a degree of regularity. This clearly shows a la
necrothread...
Yes Neone6, either one of us could be wrong. Neil is the coding genius behind it and if he finds it unethical or could at some point be classified as hacking there would be serious repercussions. It doesn't take a genius to see the decline of popularity. Just look at the WB skins library. Well over 50% of the newer skins are pay-to-play by a select few people. Years ago you had new skins coming in on a daily basis with a few non freebies here and there. I
In a nutshell... From what I understand, Microsoft has limited the access/ability to perform as much customization as they allowed in the past. They seem to make radical changes every update which further restricts things. This makes it nearly impossible for the programmers at Stardock to work around and provide as much functionality and reliability as has been present in the past. At some point the expenses of that outweigh the revenue gained from the product and it j
[quote who="DaveBax" reply="73" id="3741657"] Just need to add oldnewexplorer. [/quote] Negative... I'm not going to install an app that I have zero desire for. I like the way my explorer functions just fine. If Windowblinds can't keep up with MS Changes (regardless of fault) and hardware advancements then, it makes no sense to keep it up. DesktopX became more of a burden to keep working than it was worth too.
Anymore the only Stardock items I use are Groupy and Start 10. For Docking I use Winstep. I always felt that it was superior to Object Dock. Icon Packager has been an absolute nightmare to me in the past and caused far too much damage when uninstalling it. I gave up. Windowblinds, honestly has not been enjoyable at all since Win7 left. I've used it many times and always revert back to the default Windows theme due to some parts just seeming out of place
[quote who="LightStar" reply="47" id="3741427"] if you decide to quit offering Windowblinds/SkinStudio, why don't you offer it to Jeff at The Skins Factory [/quote] I wouldn't support anything TSF does in any shape or form. EVER!
was it a fresh install of 1809 or update to 1809. I can't reproduce the issue on either scenario.
I didn't see anything about IE being dropped. I certainly hope not. There are still several business apps that need to use IE. Cisco wireless controller management for one...
[quote who="c242" reply="10" id="3722305"] Using Glary Utilities [/quote] Thanks for that tip!!! I just installed it and kicked the tires. Seems to do as expected but have not noticed any real performance gains.
I know for a fact that Google has pretty much taken over the K-12 public school systems now. All that is really needed are some major business app developers to jump on a Linux bandwagon to start chipping away at the armor. But as you say.. it is indeed a Chicken and Egg situation..