Enough is Enough, It's Time for Bush to GO

from JoeUser Forums
What will it take to get him investigated?
What will it take to get him out?

Obviously, the elections next year might help some, if the votes are actually counted, and counted not by machines that conservative corporations own.

How many of us really think he is thinking for himself?
How many of us see what happens when he does think for himself?

Now is the time for America to rise up and say no more.
Now is the time for America to demand action.
Now is the time for the filibusters.
4,847 views 28 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top

conservation corporations own.

That a New Deal Agency owns?  They must be old and should be replaced then!

Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
Thanks for the spelling check!
Fences - Organize your desktop icons today!
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top

What will it take to get him investigated?
What will it take to get him out?


As to the first? Isn't going to happen in your or my lifetime. As for the second....nothing that you, your buddies or "anyone" else can do. At least not until 2008!
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top

What will it take to get him investigated?


Probable cause that he has committed a crime.

What will it take to get him out?


Ride out the next three years. I guarantee that W will no longer be president after January 2009.

Obviously, the elections next year might help some


Who do you expect to vote for next election cycle? 'Cause it ain't the President.

if the votes are actually counted


You mean like absentee ballots or military ballots from overseas? 'Cause Gore didn't want those counted, if I am reading your rant correctly in that you're referring to Florida.

How many of us really think he is thinking for himself?


I know I couldn't do the job without advisors. How about you? That's a big job. Become President and show us how many advisors you will need.

How many of us see what happens when he does think for himself?


He takes decisive action, like on 9/11, when he declared war on non-state actors like al-Qaeda.

Now is the time for America to rise up and say...


... how about "Thank you"?
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
Maybe, but we'll see. I have a lot of buddies.
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
No, he could be investigated and impeached after next year's election.

Thank you? You are kidding, right?
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top

No, he could be investigated and impeached after next year's election.

YOu have to have a crime to impeach. So far all the left has is a bunch of hatred.  Nothing more, and a whole lot less.

Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top

Maybe, but we'll see. I have a lot of buddies.


Got "any" proof at all that GW committed a crime? I thought not. And as to how many "buddies" you have??? I don't care if you have a million or 2, it "still" won't be enough!
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
What would he be investigated FOR? What crime has he actually committed? Sure he's unpopular, and we have elections that take care of that issue.
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
Thank you? You are kidding, right?


And NO, he wasn't kidding!
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
INvestigated for what? It might help if anyone of significance was accusing him of a crime. You've been breathing a bit too deeply and reading the signs at Sheehan's peace rallies, haven't you?
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
It is hard for me to believe that you guys have that great of blinders on, but I guess it happens.

And I do find I have to do a lot more deep breathing these days as I try new relaxation tricks to get through these damn BUsh days.
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top

It is hard for me to believe that you guys have that great of blinders on, but I guess it happens.

Why dont you show us our blinders as so far, you have not posted any facts.  Just a raving opinion.  You cannot debate opinion.

Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
We have blinders on because we don't agree with baseless complaints about criminal activity?

Do you have one point of you'd like to share? Like "I think Bush is a criminal because........." something??? Anything?????
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
You accuse us of having blinders... and still fail to back up your points. Saying "Well, it's just obvious!" shows you don't actually have an argument and are just foaming at the mouth
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
Sure, I have a lot. And I'll be back later to state them. I guess I have to accept the fact that not everyone sees the facts.
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
Sure, I have a lot. And I'll be back later to state them. I guess I have to accept the fact that not everyone sees the facts.


"When" and if you show us some, we might.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top

Sure, I have a lot. And I'll be back later to state them. I guess I have to accept the fact that not everyone sees the facts.

Just as a word of enlightenment.  Blogs, and Opinion Pieces are not facts.  So dont give us links to the NY Times Maureen Dowd or du.org.

Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top

Sure, I have a lot. And I'll be back later to state them. I guess I have to accept the fact that not everyone sees the facts.

If you had facts, you would be able to quickly list them off.  You have opinions, not facts.

Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
And he tears on over to DU to start the copy/paste fest. Talk about blinders. I think it is pretty obvious here who has skimmed the propaganda and believed it without bothering to even soak in the lies...

Someone tells you "Bush should be impeached", but they can't tell you why, and they accuse other people of wearing blinders. lol...
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
Sure, I have a lot. And I'll be back later to state them. I guess I have to accept the fact that not everyone sees the facts


We are waiting for you to provide your "facts". Please show me where Bush lied, or what crime he committed.
Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
If you had facts, you would be able to quickly list them off. You have opinions, not facts.


Cut to the heart and insightful!
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top
"If you had facts, you would be able to quickly list them off. You have opinions, not facts.

I wonder, if opinions were facts, would Clinton have ever even gotten through the Vince Foster/Whitewater period? I doubt we'd have ever heard of Monica L., he would have been in jail long before. Based on opinions, mind you.

Based on opinions, Chappaquiddick Ted would have had a very different life, as well. I think Bush haters would fare as bad or worse if they started using popular suspicion as cause for action...
Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
I'm still waiting for his proof of the "Bush lies". This is so typical. Accuse Bush of lying, but when it comes time to offer proof, they disappear.
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top
No, I'm short on time, not short on proof.

Are you all seriously happy with the path we are on?