Dr Guy Dr Guy

al-Zawahiri: Cindy Sheehan is our Ally

▼

al-Zawahiri: Cindy Sheehan is our Ally

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,171944,00.html
from JoeUser Forums

You can call the terrorist in Iraq Bacteria as one here does.  You can call them Freedom Fighters, misguided, evil, insurgents, jack asses, dip wads, murders, baby killers, and just about anything else you want to.  But you would be a fool to call them stupid.

Part of that infamous 13 page letter from al-Zawahiri to al-Zarqari, al-Zawahiri says they must be ready to fill the void when the Americans cut and run.  Note he is not saying if.  Just indicating when.

So was North Vietnam emboldened to continue a war long after it was apparent they could not win, and did win in the press with the help of the likes of Jane Fonda and John Kerry.  Now we have the DNC Leadership, Jane, Cindy and of course the MainStream Media - MSM - (John is so wishy washy that he does not even know what he is voting for or how he is voting).

Of course now, they even have more loons on their side.  White Racists, Homophobes (http://www.channeloklahoma.com/news/5085852/detail.html), anti-Semites (Sheehan), and a host of hate mongers whose sole purpose is the acquisition and consolidation of their meager power.  The Troops be damned (as well as the Iraqis - they are not real people anyway).

All of this does not surprise me in the least.  The fact that even the enemies recognize the complicity of the MSM, something the MSM still tries to deny is showing how astute they are and how totally clueless the MSM is!

"More than half of this battle is taking place in the battlefield of the media," he wrote. "We are in a media battle in a race for the hearts and minds of our umma," or community of Muslims, he (al-Zawahiri) wrote.

No, none of this really surprises me.  What does surprise me is that anyone with even a modicum of intelligence falls for this crap, and tries to not only get more American Troops killed by emboldening our enemies, but thinks they are actual doing something noble and good!  The last I checked, helping to kill a person was being an accessory, and it was a crime.

But not to these morons.

Perhaps the flaw in my logic was to think that any of them have a modicum of intelligence.  That would explain things rather well.

5,364 views 43 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top

For our efforts we get braindead people such as yourself telling us that we are no better than the bacteria.

I think he is backing off his original contention.

Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top

The idea that Saddam was as great a threat as Hitler is absolutely absurd.

Given enough time and the indifference that Hitler faced, how can you say he would not have been?  Have you learned nothing from the Munich Accords?  Apparently not.  SO why dont you just bend over now and pull down your pants to make it easier for the next tin plated tyrant to shove it up your ass.  For that is what you are advocating.

SoundPackager - Customize the Windows sound scheme
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top

Prisoner abuses and incarceration without trial are happening right now.

We all know about Abu Ghraib. I said where it was being justified.  And I dont remember any German or Japanese POWs getting trials.  What a load of garbage.

So try again one cell.  Show me where it is being justified.  Dont go off on "everyone knows it".  That is horseshit and you should at least be able to know that.

Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top

As for Collaboration with nations, there are now 49 nations involved in Iraqi Freedom (which is 15 more than the celebrated Gulf War Coalition in 90-91).

Most people do forget that.  They only remember that the cronies in crime of Russia, France and Germany did not support us. Why should they?  With the money they were siphoning out of Iraq, we killed their gravy train.

Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
Prisoner abuses and incarceration without trial are happening right now.


Another thing people so conveniently forget is, it is against the Geneva Convention to put prisoners on trial.
Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top
Dr. Guy,

EXCELLENT article. This is the perfect answer to why I, who am committed to pacifism, refuse to participate in anti war protests.
Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top
" it is against the Geneva Convention to put prisoners on trial."

Military prisoners that is, these Muslims in jump suits don't belong to an army or private army. There is no justification in holding people without even telling anyone why they are being held i.e. what they are charged with. You ask when you have condoned incarceration without trial? You did it by simply endorsing Bush's war on anyone that doesn't tow the US line.

Bush is all about extending US power by force, and representing his business interests. There is nothing about America at the moment that suggests that "freedom" is represented by this government of Bush. He is about clamping down on civil liberties domestically and subjugating foreign nations to a free market American model. All this non-specific talk about freedom is nothing but rhetoric. Bush sets the position when he talks about freedom that he IS freedom. Thus if you disagree with him, you disagree with freedom which quite clearly isn't true. It's dangerous rhetoric, and moreover it is empty rhetoric. Actions speak louder than words, and American action often does not mean freedom at all.
Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top

Another thing people so conveniently forget is, it is against the Geneva Convention to put prisoners on trial.

And of course silence from the peanut gallery.

Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top

EXCELLENT article. This is the perfect answer to why I, who am committed to pacifism, refuse to participate in anti war protests.

I think that your pledge, would be violated based upon what the terrorists are doing.  They are using these one brain cell people for their own evil ends.  The one cells dont even realize it.

Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top

Military prisoners that is, these Muslims in jump suits don't belong to an army or private army.

According to the GC, they are spies, and the only right they have is a firing squad.  Better read it before you quote it.

Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top

Bush is all about extending US power by force, and representing his business interests.

Ok, last time, now you have 2 things to prove.  Prove this and your other spurilous allegation or go back to DU.org.

You have been warned.  You want to spread your filth?  register.  Otherwise, go talk to your other one cells.

Reply #37 from JoeUser Forums Top
"the only right they have is a firing squad."

These people have never been convicted of anything, that is a disgusting statement. Besides, isn't that kind of summary justice from rulers the thing Bush is fighting against? Can you not see the hypocrisy there?

I do not know what DU.org is, I am Polish (living in London).

I will not debate with people with such odious, repulsive, violent, repressive views as to suggest firing squads for captives.
Reply #38 from JoeUser Forums Top

These people have never been convicted of anything, that is a disgusting statement. Besides, isn't that kind of summary justice from rulers the thing Bush is fighting against? Can you not see the hypocrisy there?

So Mata Hari was convicted?  You really are clueless.

Look, for the last time, you come into my blog and throw down challenges, back them up.  Next time, bring facts, or you will be zapped.

Reply #39 from JoeUser Forums Top

I will not debate with people with such odious, repulsive, violent, repressive views as to suggest firing squads for captives.

No, you would just let them kill you to prove a point.  Social darwinism may yet be a viable alternative to debating one cells.

Reply #40 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: Julian R(Anonymous User)

I warned you.  Good bye troll

Reply #41 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: Julian R(Anonymous User)Posted: Thursday, October 13, 2005

Prove your allegations or go inhabit troll ville.

Reply #42 from JoeUser Forums Top
it is against the Geneva Convention to put prisoners on trial."

Military prisoners that is, these Muslims in jump suits don't belong to an army or private army. There is no justification in holding people without even telling anyone why they are being held i.e. what they are charged with. You ask when you have condoned incarceration without trial? You did it by simply endorsing Bush's war on anyone that doesn't tow the US line.


Are you "really" that braindead? They are locked up, why? Because they were "captured" on the battlefield with weapons in HAND, shooting at our troops! Actually, if you "think" about it they are lucky. They could just as well been SHOT on the field of battle than been captured.
Reply #43 from JoeUser Forums Top

Are you "really" that braindead?

Most trolls are.  How else to explain they cannot simply register?