Bush can cut all of the funds in the world

it wont change history

Are you stupid?

I'll say it again. The reason New orleans is flooded isn't bcause of a levee break. It is because of the over engineering of the Mississippi river.
3,579 views 18 replies
Reply #1 Top
I admit, I am clueless when it comes to the landscape and engineering of the Missippi River. What I do know though is Emergency Management and Jurisdictional areas of responsibility.

Levees and land management in New Orleans the responsibility of the people and government of the city and parish of New Orleans and the State of Louisiana. Any money budgeted by the Federal government should merely be to augment and assist, not do the job for them.

For that matter, so should the disaster response and recovery.
Reply #3 Top
John, in his case, yes in answer to your question.  He is the one trick pony.  Bush is responsible for the cruxifiction of Christ, the black Plague, the Flu on 1918/19. And every other disaster of man since the dawn of time.  Just ask him.
Reply #4 Top
Bush did cut 44 mil for levee re-inforcement studies to pay for his war in Iraq. It's a fact. Wether or not it is relevant to the disaster is still up for speculation.
Reply #5 Top

Bush did cut 44 mil for levee re-inforcement studies to pay for his war in Iraq. It's a fact. Wether or not it is relevant to the disaster is still up for speculation.

last I checked, books would not have helped the levees regardless of when they were read.

Reply #6 Top
Fixing the levees doesn't help. The reson the levees failed is because of coastal errosion. If you doubt me, Discovery did a very informative special on it last night.
Reply #7 Top
New Orleans is a MAJOR port that helps supply the entire United States. Protecting that area as a hell of a lot more important then fighting Saddam in Iraq. How can we find $300 billion for Iraq and so little to protect a major American City and Port?
Reply #8 Top
Yeah! Funding to repair broken stuff never does any good! That levee was just like a welfare sinkhole, consuming the good American citizens' well-earned tax dollars. American tax money should go into non black-hole zones, like rebuilding Iraq. Let the levees pull their own weight, or fall by the wayside.
Reply #9 Top
See, I keep hearing about this phantom construction barge that was working on a bridge of Hammond Highway at Bucktown between Orpheum Ave. and Bellaire Dr., which is on Lake Pontchartrain, that broke loose from the construction site and struck the levee, causing it to fail.
Reply #10 Top
New Orleans is a MAJOR port that helps supply the entire United States


No doubt. Only one major problem, your off topic dumb ass. Stay on topic or get off of my blog.
Reply #11 Top
Yeah! Funding to repair broken stuff never does any good! That levee was just like a welfare sinkhole, consuming the good American citizens' well-earned tax dollars. American tax money should go into non black-hole zones, like rebuilding Iraq. Let the levees pull their own weight, or fall by the wayside


again ... this is not about the welfare system. This is about wether or not funding the levees would have done anything to protect New Orleans. This is about the wetlands and marsh land of south Louisiana.
Reply #12 Top
historyishere


I haven't heard that, but I am in north Louisiana. I am just trying to figure out how to protect my property now.

Yes ... our refugees are stealing from us. The just put one of the hospitals on lock down because they are stealing everything not tied down.
Reply #13 Top
Hey, John.

I hope you are doing ok. I just wanted to add my $.02 about the levee stuff. Back 10 years ago when I was a geology major we talked about how bad the levee issues were there in New Orleans. They pretty much said then there wasn't much they could do to fix it and it WOULD be a major disaster area in the not so distant future.

One other thing that seriously compounds the issues is that the delta that New Orleans was built on has been sinking over the years as the deposited sediments have been naturally compressed over time. Without the regular flooding to stack more sediment on top of the old layers, you wind up having lost a signifigant amount of elevation over the years. Unless you plan on flooding the city every year there's just no way to keep this from happening.

I agree that it would be a shame to lose such a cultural center, but the solution to this problem is not going to be simple at all. I do think they will (and should) rebuild, but unless we want to be going through this again in 50-100 years (or much, much less) they're going to have to get very creative.

*hugs*

-Erin
Reply #14 Top
Lets apply you idea of pulling their own weight to Iraq. After all, we should be helping Americans BEFORE we go helping others. The reason the Fed must be the lead is the size of the project and it impacts the economy of the entire country not just the three states hit by the storm! New Orleans is the LARGEST PORT in the US. Also, what happened to, " One Nation Under GOD"? The size and scope of the needed changes were in the hands of Bush who did NOTHING to address these needs. He cut the money that was being provided. Now we have not only the repair the levees but rebuild that entire area - about the size of England. The cost est is not up to $150 Billion and will be a lot more before this is done. We also have to wonder what will happen if another storm hits this area given the damage done by Katrina.
Reply #15 Top
I hope you are doing ok.


I am. I am always doing better though when you drop by.

Thanks for your comments. Coming from somebody who has actually done her homework, your information only bolsters the reasons to rebuild with a good plan.
Reply #16 Top
New Orleans is a MAJOR port that helps supply the entire United States. Protecting that area as a hell of a lot more important then fighting Saddam in Iraq. How can we find $300 billion for Iraq and so little to protect a major American City and Port?


Tell that to the governor.

He cut the money that was being provided.


That doesn't matter col. Construction wouldn't have been completed for years, it wouldn't have made a difference. Try again.
Reply #17 Top
Lets apply you idea of pulling their own weight to Iraq.


Do you actually bother to read what you write? I know you are a one trick pony and that you blame all of the problems of the world on Bush. What you fail to realize is that even though funds might have been diverted this problem is over a hundred years old.

Once the Mississippi river engineering projects started this fate was written in stone.

New Orleans is the LARGEST PORT in the US.


This is the reason it is flooded right now. It became important to 'rework' Mother Nature to allow business to prosper. I have news for you though; Bush wasn't even a twinkle in his daddy's eye when all of this started. Take your blame game, fold it twice and kindly shove it up your ass.

The size and scope of the needed changes were in the hands of Bush who did NOTHING to address these needs.


So when did it become the President's job to control a state's coastline. I am pretty sure that doesn't fall under his job description. However, since the funding was cut, only one person has spoken out in anger about it. Senator Landrieu complained. She isn't a very good orator though. Maybe that’s why the hurricane came. That makes about as much sense as your argument.

The cost est is not up to $150 Billion and will be a lot more before this is done.


Only one way to respond to that. Huh? Were you trying to make a point there? If you were, I think you got some words out of order or something.

We also have to wonder what will happen if another storm hits this area given the damage done by Katrina.


This would be a terrible situation. I am sure you are sitting around waiting for this to happen so you can blame that on Bush too.

COL ... you're a hack at best. I would be really interested to see what else you have to offer, but I doubt I'll ever get to see it. You'll still be bitchin about George long after he is gone.
Reply #18 Top
Well, I didn't do very much of my homework, hence the reason I did not finish school as a Geology major. But even still, glad you're doing all right and even more glad I could brighten your day a little bit.

I stop by fairly regularly, but don't get around to commenting very often. Perhaps in the future I'll find more to say.