Draginol Draginol

Copyright Violations

Copyright Violations

Don't paste other people's work and claim it as yours

We've been noticing an increasing tendancy of people to simply go and take a well known columnist's writings and simpy copy and paste the entire thing and submit it as their blog entry here on JoeUser.com.

That violates the original author's copyright. You can use pieces of someone's article as part of your own article, that is known as "fair use". But you can't just wholesale copy someone else's work and submit it as your blog entry. Not only it is unethical but it creates a potential liability problem for the site.

If someone has written an article you strongly relate to, LINK to it. That is the nature of the web. Don't just repost what they've written. In the future, we will begin to remove articles that violate copyright (or edit them to link to the original source). Make your blog site your blog site, not a mirror of someone else's. Or alternatively, email the author and ask for permission to redistribute their article.
36,523 views 63 replies
Reply #51 Top
I think what E Macy said on the other blog was pretty indicative of why this happens.

"It is justifiable and I for one and not afraid to re-print articles that support my point of view because by doing so my words will not be misconstrued, you will not look for weaknesses in my own character and make vicious personal attacks about my socio-economic status_that is none of your business."

I think many people cut & paste to imply professional authority and by-pass any accountability for the opinion. As E.Macy says, if you post what some guy at the NY Times says, there's no intellectual investment for the blogger, so no risk to one's ego. You at most sit back and watch the original author get flamed.

On the other hand if you read several such articles, absorb them, and then synthesize them into an opinion of your own, you've added to the overall body of ideas. It says a lot more about you as a blogger, too, I think.
Reply #52 Top


These rules are posted at the looniest and kookiest left wing board on the internet, DU h but beware... you run the risk of becoming as loony and as kooky as they have become

Reply #53 Top
Take note of all the speech codes and regulations, any opposing view is crushed, any post is almost certain to result in banning and deletion, so it is laughable to see some people come here and complain about Right wing extremism.
Reply #54 Top
Everyone needs to realize that this is NOT a free speech issue. This is a privately owned and run site where you have no real rights. If Brad decided he didn't want anyone with red hair posting, it would be within his rights to deny redheads access. He is NOT limiting your free speech anyway. Free speech is meant for the free expression and exchange of ideas. You are not expressing or exchanging any of your own thoughts when you just repost an article. If you posted portions and accompanied it with your own commentary and thoughts, it would be a different story. He's not telling you you can't post liberal slanted articles.

This is a free-speech argument that has long since been settled. It's been decided in courts and in classrooms. It is a dead issue that isn't open to further interpretation anymore. Ask any law professor... or heck any professor period about the issue and they'll all give you the same line. If this sort of behavior was in fact chilling free speech, the issue would have already gone to the supreme court. Face it, it's not an unconstitutional or unreasonable limit... not that the issue even applies to a private site anyway.

Online, you have NO real rights as you are using non-public resources. Think of a web site as a local mall... you can go in, shop, talk with friends, hang out, do whatever within the normal boundaries of the law, but if the management for any reason takes a disliking towards you, they can kick your butt out with little to no explanation, and since it's private property, it is their right.
Reply #55 Top

Just a question- are any of the people claiming that reposting an entire article is "fair use" IP attorneys?  Do you work with IP attorneys?  Well, Stardock does.  We have a team of attorneys.  We're not going to open the doors for a lawsuit just to allow some people to repost other peoples works. This site is owned by a corporation, so this is a commercial site.  Why would we want to get sued over something like this?  Write your own stuff.  Quote other people's stuff to make a point, give them credit, and link to them.  There is no "censorship" involved there.  Just don't be lazy, is it really that hard?


Some days I question Brad's judgment on opening this up as a totally free blog site.  I guess maybe there are reasons why other sites function the way they do.  Maybe we should have followed one of the others implementation

Reply #56 Top
A DAMN good example of why this is wrong:

Challenge: Back Up Bush's Resume

Someone gets a list of things in their email, doesn't verify any of the facts, doesn't even know what the source is, and posts it, daring people to refute it.

Why the hell should I waste hours refuting something that this guy doesn't even know is true or not? Since when does the burden of proof lay with the accused? People post this rot because they know disproving it is a statistical nightmare.

Then, when it finally ends up containing false material, they can wash their hands by saying it wasn't theirs and delight in all the people who are misled in the meantime.
Reply #57 Top
I don't think e-mail forwards should be copied and pasted since the original source is unknown therefor it is unknown if the original author had intended for his or her writing to be forwarded through e-mail and may have been posted on a personal website only for visitors to read but not copy.
Reply #58 Top
People keep saying that since this is a privately owned site it's not a matter of speech. That's true legally, but Brad is an ethical person and he runs his site according to ethics as well as legalities. And ethics allow for views that don't necessarily coincide.

~Dan
Reply #60 Top
Given Zoomba's article and the amount of reposting that's been going on, I'll bump this too....
Reply #61 Top
Worthy blog to review. The article quoters is coming back.
Reply #62 Top
I find it interesting that the typical copy/paste blogger is an anti-Bush Lib, these days. I find it to be so, anyway.
Reply #63 Top
This needed the bump.