I agree with everyone else, but I feel the need to add that this wasn't about new and unique ways to design interfaces for people to interact with. It was simply an attempt to change the way people interact with an existing interface (i.e. mouse gestures). As such, it fails and were it to be implemented it would fail just as badly if not more so as the existing windows UI. Why you ask, because the techniques discussed require as much if not more motor skills and coordination to use as clicking. The study of interface design and human interaction design go far beyond things as simple as how do you activate a button, or select new content.
These are some of the reasons that the MAC (as much as I hate it) get such rave reviews. For people who aren't accustomed to having a program menu attached to the programs main window, the idea of accessing the programs menu by simply *flinging* their mouse to the top of the screen is very easy to pick up and to use. So, here's the question (I'll come back later this afternoon to post the correct answer):
A right-handed user is known to be within 10 pixels of the exact center of a large, 1600 X 1200 screen. You will place a single-pixel target on the screen that the user must point to exactly. List the five pixel locations on the screen that the user can access fastest. For extra credit, list them in order from fastest to slowest access.
WinCustomize Forums
You cant use you mouse pointer to to follow the lines when you read (yeah i know its a kiddy thing to do but i find it easier when reading fron a screen). So give me something direct that you click not a wishy washy floaty thing. Just my personal opinion no offence ment.
