PETA - People Euthanizing Tame Animals

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160498,00.html

IN another blow to their facade, PETA has been shown to not be trying to adopt out abandoned pets, but to callously kill them.  They claim they were unable to find homes for these animals but it is clear they were not looking. 

IN a study done, it was found that while the SPCA (a very worthy and noble organization) placed upwards of 85% of its wards, PETA only placed 14%.  That is scandalous if it had been done by a Daisy Mill Puppy Farm, much less by an organization that 'talks' about the ethical treatment of animals.

But it is not surprising.  They are a sham outfit that has only dollar signs in their eyes and headline grabbing stunts to fund.  They are lower than pond scum, for pond scum cannot help but be what it was born to be.

These people work hard at being the most unethical and hypocritical bastards this planet can produce.  I guess that is why they work so hard at it, cause there are a lot of unethical and hypocritical people they are in competition with.

5,150 views 32 replies
Reply #1 Top
Animals Killed By PETA
PETA's Death Toll
Reply #2 Top
Apparently to PETA, you can kill animals, as long as you don't eat it, wear it, or tell anyone who killed them! ;~D
Reply #3 Top
Cool article, Doc. They really itch my crack and it's nice to get some dirt on them. Such terrible hypocricy.
Reply #4 Top

or tell anyone who killed them! ;~D

Fortunately, not everyone is a helpless dupe of PETA, and so their dirty little secret is out.

Reply #5 Top
Let's see...

Predators Encarcerated by The Authorities?
People for the Expedient Termination of Animals?
Reply #6 Top
Placing animals in

Exhaust-fume-filled

Tents for

Awareness
Reply #7 Top

Cool article, Doc. They really itch my crack and it's nice to get some dirt on them. Such terrible hypocricy.

They are big in this state, and I am tired of them.  They put up a bill board that said feeding your children meat was child abuse.  That did it for me!

Reply #8 Top

AS long as you killed them "ethically."

Like Terri Schiavo?

Reply #9 Top

People for the Expedient Termination of Animals?

DAMN!  I was trying to come up with something like that!  Got to give you an insightful for it!

Reply #10 Top

Placing animals in

Exhaust-fume-filled

Tents for

Awareness

Who's awareness?

Reply #11 Top
Who's awareness?


It doesn't matter, I guess, as long as they get on the news for something.
Reply #12 Top
Performing
Ethical
Torture on
Animals
Reply #13 Top
Apparently to PETA, you can kill animals, as long as you don't eat it, wear it, or tell anyone who killed them! ;~D


Yeah, that really doesn't make sense to me. They act as if it's some horrible sin to kill an animal for something to eat. But they think it's perfectly fine to just kill them for no reason what so ever. I'd rather have someone kill an animal for something to eat than just kill them for nothing in my opinion.

Good article Dr. Guy!

~carebear~

P.S.~ I just now read a comment you left to me on deathbybeebles article about dropping off animals on farms and what not. You asked how old I was. I'm 16. And thanks for the nice comment!
Reply #14 Top

Performing
Ethical
Torture on
Animals

Another good one!  I must have had brain freeze today!  Damn!  Have a cookie!

Reply #15 Top

P.S.~ I just now read a comment you left to me on deathbybeebles article about dropping off animals on farms and what not. You asked how old I was. I'm 16. And thanks for the nice comment!

You do your generation very well!  I hope you have many contemporaries that are as smart and wise as you are!

And the rest of your post was dead on!  You can be my ghost writer next time!

Reply #16 Top
You do your generation very well! I hope you have many contemporaries that are as smart and wise as you are!


Thank you!

And the rest of your post was dead on! You can be my ghost writer next time!


Thanks again! Hrmm....ghost writer....sounds good!

~carebear~
Reply #17 Top
*sigh* Only another reason to not send PETA a Christmas Card....seriously, I really hate when they have to support "animal rights" and now they senselessly dispose of them...hmm, makes you think. I'm against animal abuse but I still believe that many of them are delicious and if they're killed humanely then I don't mind using their carcass in a practical manner...food, clothing, etc. If you go and start killing animals and not using them.....I tend to have a problem with that or perhaps I'm just crazy.

~Zoo
Reply #18 Top
It's insane hey? Killing animals because you they see why they should live? They're kinda playing God...
I suppose i wouldnt mind if you killed an animal that has no chance of surviving because it's badly hurt or something, but just because you didnt find (or tried to find)) a home for it? It's heartless...
Reply #19 Top
Isn't this the Liberal repsonse, though? Euthanizing the unwanted, whether handicapped, unborn, or whatever?
Reply #20 Top

*sigh* Only another reason to not send PETA a Christmas Card....seriously, I really hate when they have to support "animal rights" and now they senselessly dispose of them...hmm, makes you think. I'm against animal abuse but I still believe that many of them are delicious and if they're killed humanely then I don't mind using their carcass in a practical manner...food, clothing, etc. If you go and start killing animals and not using them.....I tend to have a problem with that or perhaps I'm just crazy.

I think the vast majority of people are just like you.  I know I am.

Reply #21 Top

It's insane hey? Killing animals because you they see why they should live? They're kinda playing God...
I suppose i wouldnt mind if you killed an animal that has no chance of surviving because it's badly hurt or something, but just because you didnt find (or tried to find)) a home for it? It's heartless...

Makes you wonder why they call themselves ethical when the evidence is clear they dont care about the treatment of animals, just getting rid of them.

Reply #22 Top

Isn't this the Liberal repsonse, though? Euthanizing the unwanted, whether handicapped, unborn, or whatever?

Perhaps in another thread.  Today we are just talking about a contemptible organization.  I think revealing their duplicity is a non political issue.

Reply #23 Top

IN a study done, it was found that while the SPCA (a very worthy and noble organization)

The ASPCA is a worthy organization, but I wouldn't label the "SPCA" the same.  The SPCA is independent per state.  There are *many* examples where the SPCA took animals from legitimate breeders and/or homes which showed no neglect.  There was a 20/20 (or 60 minutes...on of the two) that followed one county's SPCA and found numerous cases where they took animals without just cause and then sold the animals.

Of course, the SPCA also may "adopt out" more animals because they are confiscating pure breds and then "adopting" them out at a fraction of what the pure bred is worth......

Reply #24 Top
To me, this revelation just highlights how shallow and self-serving the members of PETA are. Seems they just want to be in on a trendy cause, but don't want to make the necessary commitment to actually do anything to help....like finding homes---any homes, good OR bad---for unwanted pets.

Whenever I hear a PETA story, I'm inclined to tell the tale of how they came, a few years back, to northern West Virginia and Eastern Ohio to tranquilize as many deer as possible, so orange vests could be put on them in advance of the coming hunting season. Theory apparently was that, since the rule is that you can't shoot when you see an orange vest, the hunters would avoid shooting them, thereby saving their lives (only to probably starve to death later, of course, when the deer population was out of control without enough food for them all, but PETA's members are much too short-sighted to think that far ahead).
As it turned out, the orange vest fiasco caused a record hunt that year; hunters from all over the area sent letters and e-mails to PETA, thanking them for the kills and inviting them to come back the next year. They declined.
Reply #25 Top

The ASPCA is a worthy organization, but I wouldn't label the "SPCA" the same. The SPCA is independent per state. There are *many* examples where the SPCA took animals from legitimate breeders and/or homes which showed no neglect. There was a 20/20 (or 60 minutes...on of the two) that followed one county's SPCA and found numerous cases where they took animals without just cause and then sold the animals.
Of course, the SPCA also may "adopt out" more animals because they are confiscating pure breds and then "adopting" them out at a fraction of what the pure bred is worth......

I speak for Virginia.  Here, they have no authority to do anything but pick up and care for strays and try to adopt them out.  And they run a very good ship.