JACKSON DESRRVES TO WIN

STENTON MUST PAY FOR HIS VENDEDATTA AGAINST JACKSON

from JoeUser Forums
Michael Jackson, the Sultann of Pop, has won his legal battle and there is no doubt that the charges were trumped up. Jackson rightly said in one of his sdongs:Stenton is a hard man. However, Neverland, will never be the same again. The trial and the media hype against Jackson all mean that Michael Jackson will,have to work hard to reinvent himself. The iconic status of Jackson has actually been reinforced by this victory. We were sure that he was innocent and prayed the he will walk free. The procecution has used unethical tactics in order to nail Jackson. Calling former, disgruntled employees to testify, trying to bring as witnesses even those who benefitted through the generosity of Jackson all smacked of a personal grudge against Jackson. The Stentton Man who was responsible for this chilling percecution and procesution of Jackson must be punished for porofessional misconduct and misuse of public office against the greatest Pop Star after Elvis. The incredibly talented Jackson will be able to ressurect his music even after this mad deluge of charges. GOD BLESS M JACKSON
3,787 views 20 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
Yes, Michael Jackson is enormously talented, however, he is also a child molester and a freak of sideshow proportions.

He deserved to win this one, not because he definitely did any of the 10 crimes for which he was tried or because he didn't... the world may never know the truth on that. He deserves to win for one basic reason. The prosecution did too poor a job to leave the jury with reasonable doubt.

Stenton may have a personal vendetta against Jackson. That doesn't take away from the fact that kiddy porn was found at Neverland and there were kids fingerprints in adult mags.

Sorry, but no 40 (or even 30) something should be allowed to sleep in a bed with kids who aren't directly related. Words that would describe Michael Jackson are, "Talented", "Freak" & "Pervert".
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
there is no doubt that the charges were trumped up.


The only thing that was 'trumped up' in this case was his organ! The 'man' obviously has a lifestyle worthy of being punished in some way.
Star Control: Origins
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
Words that would describe Michael Jackson are, "Talented", "Freak" & "Pervert".


or 'oscar wilde' for short.
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
, Michael Jackson is enormously talented, however, he is also a child molester and a freak of sideshow proportions.


In spite of the best effort of Mr seddon he has been acquitted. The jury found him innocent and I think it is unfair to hound Jackson on the basis of false and motivated chazrges.
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
Since I find you to be a fairly despicable person yourself, Bahu, it doesnt suprise me in the least to see you idolizing someone like Michael


I do not understand how yopu can say such nasty things. Surely you do not mean what you write. Jackson was not tried for being weird or for having an alternate life style. He was tried on charges of child abuse:The Jury found him innocent. The matter rests there., Little Whip.
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
Since I find you to be a fairly despicable person yourself, Bahu, it doesnt suprise me in the least to see you idolizing someone like Michael


I do not understand how yopu can say such nasty things. Surely you do not mean what you write. Jackson was not tried for being weird or for having an alternate life style. He was tried on charges of child abuse:The Jury found him innocent. The matter rests there., Little Whip.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
heh....

the guy himself has admitted to sleeping in a bed with young boys.....

Now...let me ask this question:

If a priest (or, preacher) was to admit to doing that....the guy would be tossed into prison so fast, God's head would spin.

child molestation is child molestation no matter who did it, no matter how wierd the guy is who is doing it, and no matter how "popular" the guy is who is doing it......


Personally, I find it pretty disgusting. For a grown man to desire to sleep with young boys....something is seriously wrong in the brain waves....of both the man and the poor kids' parents.
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
The Jury found him innocent.


Actually they found him not guilty. which means he could have done it but that there was a reasonable doubt that he didn't.

IG
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
In spite of the best effort of Mr seddon he has been acquitted. The jury found him innocent and I think it is unfair to hound Jackson on the basis of false and motivated chazrges.


Just because you were found not guilty, does not mean you didn't actually commit the crime. He admittly sleeps with little boys. It's amazing how Jackson supporters overlook this.
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
It's amazing how Jackson supporters overlook this.


if MJ was an athlete, would his supporters be called 'athletic supporters'?
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
if MJ was an athlete, would his supporters be called 'athletic supporters'?


How about "Jacko straps"?

IG
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
not guilty does not mean innocent. Anyone who allows their child to associate with this guy from this point on is an idiot that doesn't deserve kids.
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
He's a molester but maybe not in this particular case. One problem for the prosecution is how the multiple-lawsuits-against-celebrities-gold digging plaintiff would drive her son to Jackson's home. Talk about enabling. And one has to wonder if the gross mother was hoping he would be molested so she could cash in. Laughter.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
forget that Jackson isnt the victim here, he is the accused. The true victims are the kids.
Bonus Rating: Trolling Insightful
not guilty does not mean innocent. Anyone who allows their child to associate with this guy from this point on is an idiot that doesn't deserve kids.
I think Anglo Saxon Jurisprudence is anot inquisitorial like Roman Jurisprudence and hencethe Virdict "NOT GUILTY" is the declaration of INNOCENE. Little Whip and Baker Street remenmber that ebven misdemenour chargesd were not maintained. In fact the jurors seem to think thast Jackson was set upon by Seddon for reasons best left alone. Now Jackson will bring a civil law suit and let us see what happens. Sure, sleeping with boys is not done but MJ did not abuse them, MJ is a victim of a mind set that does not let Black people shine.
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top

#17 by Bahu Virupaksha
Wednesday, June 15, 2005


I think Anglo Saxon Jurisprudence is anot inquisitorial like Roman Jurisprudence and hencethe Virdict "NOT GUILTY" is the declaration of INNOCENE. Little Whip and Baker Street remenmber that ebven misdemenour chargesd were not maintained. In fact the jurors seem to think thast Jackson was set upon by Seddon for reasons best left alone. Now Jackson will bring a civil law suit and let us see what happens. Sure, sleeping with boys is not done but MJ did not abuse them, MJ is a victim of a mind set that does not let Black people shine.






Notice the difference between the two words? Not guilty is NOT the same as innocent!


One entry found for guilty.


Main Entry: guilty
Pronunciation: 'gil-tE
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): guilt·i·er; -est
1 : justly chargeable with or responsible for a usually grave breach of conduct or a crime



Main Entry: in·no·cent
Pronunciation: 'i-n&-s&nt
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French, from Latin innocent-, innocens, from in- + nocent-, nocens wicked, from present participle of nocEre to harm -- more at NOXIOUS
1 a : free from guilt or sin especially through lack of knowledge of evil :
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
Bahu: Even jurors have come forward and stated that based on the testemony they believe Jackson molested children. There simply wasn't enough evidence to prove these particular charges.

If you choose to believe that Jackson innocently kept boys in his bed, that's your right. I seriously doubt you'd let your son sleep over, though.
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
He looks pretty damn shiny to me. If America "doesnt let black people shine" then how do you account for his fame and fortune in the first place?Well I do not want to open another can of worms on this one. But let me point out two factys: Blacks in the USA are dispropotionately represented in 1 Entertainment Industry 2 Sports and 3 Prisons. I of course hold the view that there is no point inb blaming Society for what are essentially personal flaws. However,I cannot help wondering whether MJ would have been hounded by Seddon had he not been a successful Black Icon. Now having said that I must add that I always considered O J SIMSON to be guilty as HELL even if he was found #not guilty'.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
He looks pretty damn shiny to me. If America "doesnt let black people shine" then how do you account for his fame and fortune in the first place?Well I do not want to open another can of worms on this one. But let me point out two factys: Blacks in the USA are dispropotionately represented in 1 Entertainment Industry 2 Sports and 3 Prisons. I of course hold the view that there is no point inb blaming Society for what are essentially personal flaws. However,I cannot help wondering whether MJ would have been hounded by Seddon had he not been a successful Black Icon. Now having said that I must add that I always considered O J SIMSON to be guilty as HELL even if he was found #not guilty'.
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
Michael Jackson WAS succesful. Now he's a has-been. You're theory would work a bit better if you said that the reason he got out of a court date in '93 was because he was more succesful and influential then than he is now.
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
the reason he got out of a court date in '93 was because he was more succesful and influential then than he is now


having a lot more money back then worked to his advantage. most molestors don't have the kinda bucks needed to stifle their victims and make the charges go away.