dynamaso dynamaso

It Is My Fault

It Is My Fault

And I'm prepared to take the blame...

I’m writing this in response to a number of pieces I’ve read here recently and to a disturbingly increasing amount of media reports about this as well. I want to know where people think personal responsibility stops and where public liability starts?

I believe there are very few instances where personal responsibility should stop. The way I see it, if I trip over the crack in the sidewalk or spill a hot beverage on myself, I am the only person responsible. If I drive my car into oncoming traffic because the sun has reflected off a building into my eyes, well, it is an accident but no one is to blame, unless you want to blame the sun. It is an Act of Nature that has caused the accident. The people who own the building or clean the windows can’t be held responsible. Accidents do happen. And when accidents happen, sometimes people get hurt. It is unfortunate or, in some cases, even tragic, but it is reality. Some of the suits I’ve read about recently are anything but realistic. Yet people still pursue them and judges still let them be heard.

How about if I were in my own kitchen and my wife had made a nice hot cup of coffee, which I then spilt over myself? I’m not going to sue her, am I? She knows I’m an adult and I should be able to hold a hot cup of coffee. Her trusting in this is preconceived, sure, but putting trust in pretty much anything or anyone involves having some sort of preconceived notion of how they will behave. (As an aside, I also am acutely aware of how clumsy I can be, so I am more than willing to say ‘Oops’, apply some antiseptic cream to the burn and clean up the mess).

Personal responsibility has eroded to the point in Australia where events such as school fetes and dog shows are unable to go ahead because the insurance costs are just too much for the organisers to cover. Most of the events hurt by this are usually community or charity events. The other group hit hardest are the small sports clubs. These clubs usually rely on nominal participation fees and are most often formed for the benefit of local children. With both media and politics focussing on obesity levels, particularly concerning children, this situation only highlights the inadequateness of our local, state and national authorities in not doing anything about stemming the flow of ridiculous suits.

Another option, as far as I can see, is for the government to instigate a public-funded Department of Blame, whose sole role is to take the blame for anything falling outside the brackets of personal responsibility. I envisage roaming Blame Clerks, who can be called to contentious mishaps and make on-the-spot decisions based on immediate facts. As I see it, there are only three decisions the incident can be decided against. The first is ‘No-ones Fault’, the second is ‘Individual Fault’ and the third is ‘Department of Blame’s Fault’. The only time a person can pursue a suit is if the incident is deemed the ‘Department of Blame’s Fault’.

The third and final option, in my opinion, is for someone to take the blame. For everything. Always. Sure, the first few people who sue will get something, but every one after won’t see a red cent. Hopefully, the world will forget one person is to blame and start taking their personal responsibility seriously. So with this in mind, I volunteer myself. I’ve even got my tag line prepared - “Oops, sorry, it will happen again.”

11,691 views 29 replies
Reply #26 Top
Incidentally, did you hear about the couple who got married over your way and had local businesses sponsor most of the wedding.


Ha haha hahahaha! And I call myself a freeloader. I suppose they wrote on their invitation, "No gifts--just money, please."

-A.
Reply #27 Top
Apparently, there was an 'approved' sponsors gift list, and any guest buying a gift at these outlets received a discount. How crazy is that?
Reply #28 Top
I don't think many of us would find today's suits entertaining unless the losers were punished in some publically humiliating way.


Are you kidding? If they weren't entertaining the media wouldn't bother expending so much coverage on them. The news stopped being about news a long time ago. Now they just fluff in a little news in between entertainment. But I think the public humiliation idea would really tickle the media's fancy.
Reply #29 Top
Mason,

The news stopped being about news a long time ago


And herein lies the problem. This has been a beef of mine for ages. As Champas rightly points out, the media is only responding the the wants of the general public, so the more fluff, the better, it seems. I can't and don't 'blame' the media as I understand the buzz of having a story i KNOW people are going to like, even if I think it is a crock of crap. As a friend of mine said recently '...and crap news is better than no news at all.' At the time, I laughed. Now, I'm not so sure.

As for public humiliation, wasn't there a post here recently speculating about what it might be like to reintroduce stocks in public places for petty criminals etc, instead of clogging up the penal system? I think it is a fine idea and would have anyone contemplating a suit or any illegal action actually thinking about it before they did it. And getting people to think first has got to be a step in the right direction

Thanks for your input.