Widgets become Gadgets

DesktopGadgets.com

http://www.desktopgadgets.com

On March 1st, Stardock will release DesktopX Pro. It's a $69.95 version of DesktopX designed for power users and software developers who are interested in turning their widgets into completely stand-alone program.

A gadget is essentially the same as a widget but with one key difference - they don't require any run-times or anything else in order to run. A gadget can be sent to anyone running Windows 2000/XP and run.

This may present an opportunity for ambitious software developers who recognize that there's a big world besides clocks and calendars and RSS feeds. That's because DesktopX 3 has direct access to a great deal of the underlying Windows APIs. In other words, the types of programs one might have created with Visual Basic in the past for release on-line can be created with DesktopX Pro with a lot less effort and with all the cool visuals included.

To facilitate developers, Stardock will be launching a new site in April called DesktopGadgets.com.  On it, developers can upload their gadgets, set their price (free or any amount they choose), and if it passes moderation the gadget then becomes available for sale with the developer and the site splitting the proceeds.

Stardock hopes that this will open up a whole new category of software development and increase the quality of available gadgets and widgets available.

4,073 views 4 replies
Reply #1 Top

Excelent! Im in...

Reply #2 Top
Sounds awesome!!! The article raises a few questions for me...

1. Will there be any price break for current ODNT owners or WinCustomize subscribers???
2. If not VB, then what software??? Is it proprietary in nature?
3. How will the developer be able to accurately track sales of his/her itms???
4. Is the moderation system there different than the one here?
5. Is there a SDK floating around anywhere? If not, when?

It sounds like we're going to be seeing some more goodies here in StarDock Land!!!!
Reply #4 Top

Not wanting to sound negative but 70 bucks sounds like a bit much for a skinning program.

It's not a 'skinning program'...