Screenshots...The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
from
JoeUser Forums
"The Good, The Bad and The Ugly"....not talking about screenshots themselves, but just trying to point out up front that this thread could easily go in that direction and I would rather that folks remain civil when posting in this thread about screenshots...Thanks ahead of time 
I'm no legal expert....
I am of the opinion that a screenshot is like a photo. Whether it is a picture of your desktop you captured or a picture of a Disney character you took while on vacation, you own the picture, you don't own the content of the picture, if you didn't create it. The artist or copyright holder owns the content of the image. So I believe that you have a responsibility, if you display in public, to present the content in a positive light and if your "picture" doesn't redistribute the artist or copyright holder's original content without consent then it constitutes fair use. How you present that content in your picture is fair game as well, provided that the intent is not to defame or slander the artist or copyright holder. So if I displayed in public a picture I have of let's say Mickey Mouse and alter it so that he's standing there with his knickers around his ankles, then I'd expect that if Disney asked I'd have to remove the picture from the public's view, though Disney can't have the picture because I'm the one who took it with a digital camera then altered it.
I'm not saying that my view is correct, I just posting my viewpoint to get the discussion going so that in the end we all will benefit from having a clearer understanding.

I'm no legal expert....
I am of the opinion that a screenshot is like a photo. Whether it is a picture of your desktop you captured or a picture of a Disney character you took while on vacation, you own the picture, you don't own the content of the picture, if you didn't create it. The artist or copyright holder owns the content of the image. So I believe that you have a responsibility, if you display in public, to present the content in a positive light and if your "picture" doesn't redistribute the artist or copyright holder's original content without consent then it constitutes fair use. How you present that content in your picture is fair game as well, provided that the intent is not to defame or slander the artist or copyright holder. So if I displayed in public a picture I have of let's say Mickey Mouse and alter it so that he's standing there with his knickers around his ankles, then I'd expect that if Disney asked I'd have to remove the picture from the public's view, though Disney can't have the picture because I'm the one who took it with a digital camera then altered it.
I'm not saying that my view is correct, I just posting my viewpoint to get the discussion going so that in the end we all will benefit from having a clearer understanding.