Jury recommends execution for Scott Peterson
What do you think?
thanks for reading,
thatoneguyinslc
| Lethal Injection. |
hahahahah ya beat me to it. but whattaya spect from a guy who resides in a state where they still have a firing squad?
| ...We just quit hanging people 10 years ago |
i know it all too well. i got stuck with about 100,000 unsold 'utah capital criminals are well-hung' bumperstickers. 
I understand the need for vengence. I understand the need to feel like justice has been served.
But will killing him bring Lacey and Connor back? No. Will it make what he did any less heinous? No.
I'm caught, I really am. On the one hand, I'm aware of how miserable life on death row can be.....and on the other, I can understand the reasoning behind "well, Laci won't live to see the sunrise again, so why should he" mentality.
The impact statements broke my heart. laci's mother on the stand, describing her funeral...how she knew that laci and connor were in the same casket, but that she also knew that laci didn't have any arms to hold her son with......even now it brings tears to my eyes.
but it still doesn't give me the feeling that executing him would be just punishment.
| I think he would have been worse off if they just let him rot in prision for the rest of his pitiful life...see my article. |
| but it still doesn't give me the feeling that executing him would be just punishment. |
| it does me. |
I can see why, given your occupation.
But how can a humane death be retribution for what he did?
| But how can a humane death be retribution for what he did? |
Shovel...I'm so torn. I know what you're talking about, and I agree that something has to be done. One part of me wants that mudering bastard to cry and piss his pants with fear on the way to his execution...but another part realizes that killing him, whilst it rids society of his evil, does no good. It doesn't bring anyone back, it doesn't make anything right again.
I guess I'm going to have to come off the fence sometime, huh?
| I guess I'm going to have to come off the fence sometime, huh? |
| Execution of Scott Peterson. Well he did kill his wife and unborn child. Some would say an eye for an eye type of thing, and I have to agree with that myself, at least in this case. But there are other reason that will sound cruel maybe but none the less true. It cost around $26,000 per year, per inmate to house them in a prison system, and that is if they do not require extra attention or have medical issue. Do you really want to spend your tax dollars feed someone like this that committed such a crime? I myself do not. Cold but true. |
| It also costs money to buy the necessary supplies/equipment, hire people, and keep everything working. Plus the extra time it takes in court to decide whether or not to use the death penalty. Plus, what if he didn't commit the crime? So many people have been killed and then later been found innocent. It costs money to keep anyone in jail. Why don't we just kill everyone? |
| That way, people are protected against any oppressive system that thinks its justified to kill black people or whatever. |
| At this point, Laci and her baby are already dead. Keeping Scott in jail would serve the same purpose as killing him. The only reasons people like the death penalty are revenge and money. First, human lives should never be used as a tool for revenge. Killing Scott won't bring back Laci and the baby. Putting him in jail for life would be punishment enough. Second, sure, money is important, but its nothing compared to a human life, even one that has committed murder. |
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.