The DJ The DJ

Music Industry suing file sharers

Music Industry suing file sharers

WASHINGTON -- The embattled music industry disclosed plans today for an unprecedented escalation in its fight against Internet piracy, threatening to sue hundreds of individual computer users who illegally share music files online.

The Recording Industry Association of America, citing significant sales declines, said it will begin today to search Internet file-sharing networks to identify music fans who offer "substantial" collections of mp3 song files for downloading.

It expects to file at least several hundred lawsuits seeking financial damages within eight to 10 weeks.

Executives for the RIAA, the Washington-based lobbying group that represents major labels, would not say how many songs on a user's computer might qualify for a lawsuit. The new campaign comes just weeks after U.S. appeals court rulings requiring Internet providers to identify subscribers suspected of illegally sharing music and movie files.

The RIAA's president, Carey Sherman, said tens of millions of Internet users of popular file-sharing software after Thursday will expose themselves to "the real risk of having to face the music."

Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., who has proposed giving the entertainment industry new powers to disrupt downloads of pirated music and movies, said the RIAA's actions were overdue. "It's about time," Berman said in a statement. "For too long ... file-traffickers have robbed copyright creators with impunity."

The RIAA said its lawyers will file lawsuits initially against people with the largest collections of music files they can find online. U.S. copyright laws allow for damages of $750 to $150,000 for each song offered illegally on a person's computer, but Sherman said the RIAA will be open to settlement proposals from defendants.

"We have no hard and fast rule on how many files you have to be distributing ... to come within our radar screen," Sherman said. "We will go after the worst offenders first."

The RIAA said it expected to file "at least several hundred lawsuits" within eight to 10 weeks but will continue to file lawsuits afterward on a regular basis.






For the whole story:
http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Entertainment/ap20030625_1212.html
[Message Edited]
24,932 views 99 replies
Reply #76 Top
a few hours + file sharing softare x 50 blank cds = happy people


I never said I DL with kazaa... I don't. I did in the past when Napster was around but lately I just buy the CD from the CD store cuz even if I like 1 song I find others i like to. I was just trying to figure out why the CD from the CD store costs so much.
Reply #77 Top
#67 by CognitoToo - 6/29/2003 4:34:42 PM PAxx, this isn't true. Artists get 30% of the revenue for a concert. And anywhere from 1,000 to 10,000+ seats in a arena. At $30-$50 dollars a seat, this is a good profit. Then, if you multiply this by 60-120+ yearly engagements, one has a good profit. I would love to put 3,000 US in my pocket for one night. It is true that I have seen $1-3 million dollar checks for record sales to an artist, but that is excessive and rare. I feel the same about multi-million dollar sport contracts while other people are starving. Therefore, I believe that people like Madonna and Metallica are as greedy as the record industry. But, then you have artists who are starving while their music is still being sold and royalties are still being made by selling rights to record their songs to other artists.



That is a good theory but if the artist are not well known then why would most of the poeple go? Record sales, whether in thier home country or abroad, helps with popularity, knowning songs lirics, fan clubs, and other type stuff.


By following your theory, artist wouldn't make no where near what they could make. It wouldn't be world tours, or 20 state tours or 20 city tours.

Who is that? DeBarge? Never heard of them. Yo-Yo Ma?? Green Eye Peas? Destiniy's Child? Never seen them.
Reply #78 Top
kona: i wasn't reffering to you.
i was reffering to people in general
[Message Edited]
Reply #80 Top
nothing to see here - move along

[Message Edited]
Reply #81 Top
I wasnt sure what the difference in quality was between Mp3 and full cd quality so I d/l Kazaa and got some of the THX sound tests. I have a CD of them too. When played back, the Mp3's had alit of distortion as the ranges cahnged from low to mid and from mid to high. It gave kind of a warbling sound. Not good. The CDs however did not have this problem. Clear as a bell the whole way through.
Reply #82 Top
depends how the person converted mp3, as you can make MP3's alot better than cd quality
Reply #83 Top
you CAN'T make an mp3 better than the quality of the cd it came from
Reply #84 Top
Sure you can likwid... crank up the gain, bass and treble.
Reply #85 Top
I tweak every song in cooledit pro before burning for the car.Many songs are eq'd poorly and volumes are not the same from track to track.
Reply #86 Top
depends how the person converted mp3, as you can make MP3's alot better than cd quality


Doomgaze is correct.

Do not forget that CDs stream data at more than a megabit per second. 128 falls short, especially with high frequencies; higher bit rates may be indistinguishable with the normal ear and average setup, however, with a good ear and a high end system, this isn't always the case.

Do not foget either about SACD and DVD-A.
Reply #87 Top

I don't have a fancy ear. To me, even 64 bits sounds good enough. That's how I compress my MP3's. The difference in weight is huge, and I really don't see that much difference (especially to listen on my cheapo speakers with my cheapo sound card).

Reply #88 Top
I don't notice the difference either... or maybe I didn't really care to much about it at most times.

CD's to me wer always better and depending on how you make it into a MP3, it can sound worst or better.

Reply #89 Top
Sure, you can remaster a song and add effects and eq'ing. But the original ripped song cannot be better than the quality of the original. MP3 compression doesn't remaster or declick. Nor, does WMA compression. But, I too have improved the quality of CD songs with programs such as Cool edit Pro and Sound Forge. But, one has to start with the original which can only be as good as the original CD track.
Reply #90 Top
I don't have a good ear either...It's all sounds good to me, umm.. unless I'm listening to an AM station

My hubby is like "shocked", that I can't tell the diff from a vcr tape or a dvd....I tell him, If the story is good, It's all that matters!

Now he want's one of those plasma flat screens!

Grrrrrrr, Men!
Reply #91 Top
yeah, we're suckers for cool stuff!!



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #92 Top
i have 2 sets of car mp3 cd's
1: jeep set... 96kbs/128kbs why? jeeps are noisy as hell... you don't notice when its "ok" quality.. but i do alot of distance in the jeep so... lots of music = better

2: audi set... the car has a Bose custom sound system... all 192kbs (they're as good as the origional cd's) just more cd's *shrug* (audi's have notoriously quiet interiors in comparison to just about every other make)
Reply #93 Top
...don't they have more important things to be doing?

maybe worry about educating all the stupid people in our world, then we wouldn't have to worry about crimes so much.
Reply #94 Top
Most people have better things to do than educate stupid people...
Reply #95 Top
I think stupid people should wear signs that say I'm stupid so we would not have to waste or time...

Wait a minute I would have to wear one! >
Reply #96 Top
So all stupid people wear signs saying 'Kona0197 is stupid' OK...
Reply #97 Top
Hey, tipping the attendants on their corporate jets is important to the RIAA.
Reply #99 Top
Paying for chefs is VERY important!



Powered by SkinBrowser!