About English, in English.

Hi. So that you know, I'm from the US.


>i got a small doubt in English...since most of u r from the Americas and the Eu, i think you can help.
>
>1. possible
"Possible" means "can happen."


>2. probable
"Probable" means "likely to happen."

>
>ok, suppose u say that:
>Possibly, it is Mr.X who might win the race
>Probably, it is Mr.Y who might win the race

You wouldn't say that. "Possibly" and "probably" are never to be used along with the words "may," "might," "do," "does," "did," "could," or "would."

In English, saying the same thing twice in one sentence is grammatically incorrect. (That's called being "redundant.")

"Must" and "should" are also never used with "possibly" or "probably," because the sentence would make no logical sense.


The proper way to phrase your sentences is like this:

Mr. X probably will win the race.
Mr. Y possibly will win the race.
or
Mr. Z {may, might, can, could, would or should} win the race.

One should only use "should" if he means "probably," and only use "might" or "could" if one doubts that he will.

One can also put "probably" or "possibly" at the beginning of the sentence, as long as it is set off by a comma, but not at the end; sentences in English end only in nouns (people, places, things, or ideas), verbs (actions), or pronouns ("he," "she," "it," "you," "I," "they," "ye," "we," etc..).

"Will win" is one verb, and the two words that form it should never be separated. This goes for all verbs beginning with "to," "has," "have," "had," "may," "might," "must," "do," "does," "did," "can," "could," "will," "would," "shall," and "should."

I hope that answers your question, Lord Vimal!

-AJBlue98

Powered by SkinBrowser!
6,934 views 27 replies
Reply #1 Top
Pedantry is alive and well and living in the guise of AJBlue98....
Reply #2 Top
Possibly 'must' is the word you are seeking.

Used in one sentence, gramatically correct and makes sense too....
Reply #3 Top
Oh....forgot.
Would have been more appropriate to have all this in Lord Vimal's thread, rather than creating another one....
Reply #4 Top
Hehehe, funny:

> One should only use "should" if he means "probably," and only use "might" or "could"
> if one doubts that he will.

Does "should" mean "probably" in that sentence?
I believe "should" can also be an imperative, meaning "must".
Reply #6 Top
As Jafo pointed out, you really shouldn't have started a new thread to answer Lord Vimal's question. You should have answered within the original thread.................
Or maybe I should start a new thread to tell you this....
Reply #7 Top
Half past three!
Reply #8 Top
Jafo, would that be meticulousness or arrogance?



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #10 Top
But, I speak "American" not "English"
Biscuits, crackers, pudding, cake, custard, etc. all have different "English" meanings than they do in "American"....
Reply #12 Top
psstttt...bkb....that's what the "etc." (meaning etcetera) was for. Obviously, I could spend all day listing words that we use differently. But, I was hungry, so I stuck to the first food words that came to mind
Reply #13 Top
After I readed this and knowed what it was about, I feeled it to be gooder if it was putted in the original thread (now that I learnt "possible" and "probable", ima go work on Irregular verbs)
Reply #14 Top
'meds' is a good example of differing meanings..
Reply #15 Top
You dont want to learn the Voo langauge then heh

The trouble with Scotland is that it's full of Scots. Perhaps the time has come to reinstitute an old custom.
Reply #16 Top
Biscuits, crackers, pudding, cake, custard, etc. all have different "English" meanings than they do in "American"....

They have different meanings in Yorkshire than they do in English

Biscuits: Group of 'dim' people
Crackers: Group of nice looking ladies
Pudding: Force applied. i.e. "not enough pudding" = under strength
Cake: Mud stuck to your shoes
Custard: Someone who is "thick" (stupid)

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #17 Top
And for the original question...

Possibly = I've not even thought about it.
Probably = Thought about it but I'm not going to do it.

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #19 Top
'food' is NEVER 'food' in the UK....English cuisine is an oxymoron....
Chip butties, anyone?....
Reply #21 Top
The only problem with food over here is all the foreign muck we have to put up with. It seems these days as a favourite fish & chips has given way to Madras Curry or Chicken Tikka Massala - where's that puke icon when you need it...

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #22 Top
"'food' is NEVER 'food' in the UK....English cuisine is an oxymoron...." - jafo

if this includes an ox barbequed to death by the neighborhood moron, then i've witnessed this cuisine in texas as well.
Reply #23 Top
There is absolutely nothing wrong with Good Wholesome English Food!! I don't eat any foreign food at all. My wife is an excellent cook so I don't need to eat all that foreign rubbish that destroys your insides and gives you a 42" waistline. You can keep your curries and Chinese and Pizzas and cardboard burgers.
(besides, I've been on a diet for 6 months, and discussions about food just annoy me!)

Karma Girl: your food analogies are becoming rather worrying.
Reply #24 Top
Bangers and mash, anyone?...