IPlural IPlural

Artical in CPU magazine explains something interesting about XP refresh rates and eye strain.

Artical in CPU magazine explains something interesting about XP refresh rates and eye strain.

It seems that no matter what the performance settings on your Monitor and Video card allows.
By default without making use of the tweaking software that comes with most driver cd's, XP
will not allow your refresh rates to exceed 60 which can and does cause headaches, eye strain,
blurred vision, etc after a period of time looking at the monitor. From what the artical states
you should set your refresh for monitor and videocard to at least 75 - 80 to save your eyes.
Higher if they will allow it, you have to use a utility to do this, and you also have to make
sure it loads on boot up as Windows XP will return the registry settings to the default of 60
on the next boot...

thought if anyone was noticing issues like this, it might make a difference for you..


Powered by SkinBrowser!
8,720 views 29 replies
Reply #26 Top
/me simply happily reads the thread on his notebooks gorgeous little LCD screen, laughing at all this silly talk of refresh rates. ^_^

That said - I've never had any problems with refresh rates resetting to 60 on the 19" monitor attached to my Radeon 8500 upstairs. I went it, set them all at 75Mhz, and I've been happy since. (Honestly, there's little benefit to your eyes pushing it higher than the 75-80 range, and as your refresh rate gets higher, your image quality starts to suffer.)
Reply #27 Top
very true, but lower sure does do a number on some...

even in that artical they said later on that between 75 - 80 was best, because above that the human eye can not discern any difference and it does lower the MTF... *snap* click, Hhhhhhmmmmmm.... what the hell? seen that more than once years back, when there actually WAS a reason for screen savers...
now all they do is eat resources and not give them all back when they restore the desktop!


Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #29 Top
http://www.majorgeeks.com/article.php?sid=1457&cat=22
Ya gotta have the 'http://' in front...